Quantum Build-Tech Limited
Quantum Build-Tech Limited (QUANTBUILD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QUANTBUILD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUANTBUILD.BO | ₹4.77 | +0.00% | 119.6M | -36.69 | -₹0.13 | N/A |
| BRRL.BO | ₹990.00 | +0.80% | 10.2B | 219.03 | ₹4.52 | N/A |
| COROENGG.BO | ₹90.84 | +2.00% | 3.2B | 110.78 | ₹0.82 | N/A |
| CHAVDA.NS | ₹87.30 | -3.48% | 2.2B | 10.20 | ₹8.56 | N/A |
| ALPINEHOU.BO | ₹79.90 | -5.48% | 1.4B | 24.14 | ₹3.31 | N/A |
| VAGHANI.BO | ₹233.40 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 243.13 | ₹0.96 | N/A |
| PRERINFRA.BO | ₹20.74 | -6.07% | 749.3M | 15.59 | ₹1.33 | N/A |
| GUJTLRM.BO | ₹0.48 | -5.88% | 668.3M | 0.48 | ₹0.99 | N/A |
| VARIMAN.BO | ₹2.89 | -4.93% | 562.3M | 20.64 | ₹0.14 | N/A |
| SHRISTI.BO | ₹24.55 | -3.54% | 545M | -4.35 | -₹5.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QUANTBUILD.BO vs BRRL.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, BRRL.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while BRRL.BO trades at ₹990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas BRRL.BO's P/E ratio is 219.03. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRRL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to BRRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check BRRL.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs COROENGG.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, COROENGG.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while COROENGG.BO trades at ₹90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas COROENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 110.78. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COROENGG.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to COROENGG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check COROENGG.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs CHAVDA.NS Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, CHAVDA.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while CHAVDA.NS trades at ₹87.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas CHAVDA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHAVDA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to CHAVDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check CHAVDA.NS's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs ALPINEHOU.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, ALPINEHOU.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while ALPINEHOU.BO trades at ₹79.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas ALPINEHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALPINEHOU.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to ALPINEHOU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check ALPINEHOU.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs VAGHANI.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, VAGHANI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while VAGHANI.BO trades at ₹233.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas VAGHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 243.13. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VAGHANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to VAGHANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check VAGHANI.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs PRERINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, PRERINFRA.BO has a market cap of 749.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while PRERINFRA.BO trades at ₹20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas PRERINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRERINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to PRERINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check PRERINFRA.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs GUJTLRM.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, GUJTLRM.BO has a market cap of 668.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while GUJTLRM.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas GUJTLRM.BO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GUJTLRM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to GUJTLRM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check GUJTLRM.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs VARIMAN.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, VARIMAN.BO has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while VARIMAN.BO trades at ₹2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas VARIMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VARIMAN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to VARIMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check VARIMAN.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs SHRISTI.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, SHRISTI.BO has a market cap of 545M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while SHRISTI.BO trades at ₹24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas SHRISTI.BO's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHRISTI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to SHRISTI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check SHRISTI.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs MANJEERA.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, MANJEERA.BO has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while MANJEERA.BO trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas MANJEERA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MANJEERA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to MANJEERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check MANJEERA.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs SISL.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, SISL.BO has a market cap of 377.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while SISL.BO trades at ₹210.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas SISL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SISL.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to SISL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check SISL.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs PARSHWANA.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, PARSHWANA.BO has a market cap of 297.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while PARSHWANA.BO trades at ₹95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas PARSHWANA.BO's P/E ratio is 88.79. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PARSHWANA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to PARSHWANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check PARSHWANA.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs POPULARES.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, POPULARES.BO has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while POPULARES.BO trades at ₹12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas POPULARES.BO's P/E ratio is -1262.00. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POPULARES.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to POPULARES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check POPULARES.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs ADHBHUTIN.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, ADHBHUTIN.BO has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while ADHBHUTIN.BO trades at ₹12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas ADHBHUTIN.BO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADHBHUTIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to ADHBHUTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check ADHBHUTIN.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs DRL.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, DRL.BO has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while DRL.BO trades at ₹18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas DRL.BO's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DRL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to DRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check DRL.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs CEMAINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, CEMAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while CEMAINFRA.BO trades at ₹4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas CEMAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -38.31. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CEMAINFRA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to CEMAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check CEMAINFRA.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs LAHL.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, LAHL.BO has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while LAHL.BO trades at ₹6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas LAHL.BO's P/E ratio is -75.11. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAHL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to LAHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check LAHL.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs SKIFL.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, SKIFL.BO has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while SKIFL.BO trades at ₹9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas SKIFL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKIFL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to SKIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check SKIFL.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs KMFBLDR.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, KMFBLDR.BO has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while KMFBLDR.BO trades at ₹6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas KMFBLDR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KMFBLDR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to KMFBLDR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check KMFBLDR.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs EASTBUILD.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, EASTBUILD.BO has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while EASTBUILD.BO trades at ₹43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas EASTBUILD.BO's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EASTBUILD.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to EASTBUILD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check EASTBUILD.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs CRANEINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, CRANEINFRA.BO has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while CRANEINFRA.BO trades at ₹10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas CRANEINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRANEINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to CRANEINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check CRANEINFRA.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs NYSSACORP.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, NYSSACORP.BO has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while NYSSACORP.BO trades at ₹2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas NYSSACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NYSSACORP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to NYSSACORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check NYSSACORP.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs MAHESH.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, MAHESH.BO has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while MAHESH.BO trades at ₹12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas MAHESH.BO's P/E ratio is -87.86. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAHESH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to MAHESH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check MAHESH.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs UNISHIRE.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, UNISHIRE.BO has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while UNISHIRE.BO trades at ₹1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas UNISHIRE.BO's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UNISHIRE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is less volatile compared to UNISHIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check UNISHIRE.BO's competition here
QUANTBUILD.BO vs ATHCON.BO Comparison April 2026
QUANTBUILD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUANTBUILD.BO stands at 119.6M. In comparison, ATHCON.BO has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUANTBUILD.BO is priced at ₹4.77, while ATHCON.BO trades at ₹3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUANTBUILD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -36.69, whereas ATHCON.BO's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATHCON.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUANTBUILD.BO is more volatile compared to ATHCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUANTBUILD.BO.Check ATHCON.BO's competition here