QRS Music Technologies, Inc.
QRS Music Technologies, Inc. QRSM Peers
See (QRSM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRSM | $0.00 | -99.70% | 1.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NCBDY | $16.66 | -6.98% | 45.8B | 19.71 | $0.89 | +0.75% |
| OLCLF | $23.00 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 45.65 | $0.52 | +0.23% |
| OLCLY | $22.60 | -1.62% | 36.4B | 42.66 | $0.52 | +0.35% |
| CUKPF | $25.19 | +13.78% | 36.3B | 16.25 | $1.55 | N/A |
| ANPDY | $300.64 | -0.06% | 33.8B | 16.09 | $18.82 | +2.49% |
| ANPDF | $11.65 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 15.53 | $0.75 | +2.60% |
| NCBDF | $32.20 | +0.00% | 21.7B | 19.04 | $1.79 | +1.40% |
| SHMDF | $149.32 | +0.00% | 13B | 30.97 | $4.82 | +1.39% |
| SMNNY | $14.26 | -1.38% | 12.4B | 29.46 | $0.48 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QRSM vs NCBDY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while NCBDY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs OLCLF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while OLCLF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and OLCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs OLCLY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while OLCLY trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs CUKPF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CUKPF trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs ANPDY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while ANPDY trades at $300.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs ANPDF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while ANPDF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and ANPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs NCBDF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while NCBDF trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and NCBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs SHMDF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while SHMDF trades at $149.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and SHMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs SMNNY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while SMNNY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs GMWKF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while GMWKF trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs THUPY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while THUPY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and THUPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs LNNGY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while LNNGY trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs LNNGF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while LNNGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and LNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs NINOF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and NINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs YAMCF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while YAMCF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and YAMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs NINOY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while NINOY trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs YAMCY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while YAMCY trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs THLPF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and THLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs TCCHF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and TCCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs TOMYY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and TOMYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs SNMSF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while SNMSF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs RNDOF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and RNDOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs YONXF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and YONXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs BSFFF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BSFFF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 147.43. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and BSFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs DTCGF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and DTCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs MPZAF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 75.59. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and MPZAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CLPIF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CLPIF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CLPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs HRVFF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while HRVFF trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and HRVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs HISJF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and HISJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs DRMMF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 850.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while DRMMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and DRMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs TNIEF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while TNIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 55.58. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and TNIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs MPZAY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and MPZAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs BTEAF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and BTEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CTVIF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 725.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CTVIF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CTVIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs VVCHF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 669M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while VVCHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and VVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs UETMF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 622.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and UETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs SHOFF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while SHOFF trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and SHOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CLKXF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 422.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CLKXF trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CLKXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs OQLGF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and OQLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs GYYMF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and GYYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs GBBYF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and GBBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs FOCIF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and FOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs PYHOF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and PYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs RPNMF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and RPNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CGROF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CGROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs KICK Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and KICK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs BOLL Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and BOLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs PMTYF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while PMTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and PMTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs GFIZF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and GFIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CNLFF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CNLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs PRKA Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while PRKA trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and PRKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs KENS Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while KENS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KENS's ROE of +5.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and KENS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs DSHK Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while DSHK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs PFFEF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and PFFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs VIRA Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and VIRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs TOYRF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while TOYRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and TOYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs BWMG Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BWMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BWMG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and BWMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs GTHKF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and GTHKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs BTDG Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs BFXXQ Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and BFXXQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs SPQS Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 342.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM is less volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRSM.
QRSM vs MSET Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and MSET have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs TRBX Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and TRBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs VMHG Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 160K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and VMHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs XFTB Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and XFTB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs VTMB Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and VTMB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs ECMH Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and ECMH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs DAAT Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and DAAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs ALTD Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and ALTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs OMWS Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and OMWS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs JMIH Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and JMIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs GLFN Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and GLFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs LCLP Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and LCLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs ROCLF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and ROCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs PRXIQ Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and PRXIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs BYDC Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and BYDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs FTFY Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and FTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs WMGPF Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and WMGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs TVPC Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and TVPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CLUBQ Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CLUBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QRSM vs CLVFA Comparison
QRSM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRSM stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRSM is priced at $0.00, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRSM and CLVFA have similar daily volatility (0.00).