Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. QNTO Peers
See (QNTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QNTO | $10.96 | +0.00% | 28.5M | 15.74 | $0.69 | +4.79% |
| CAIXY | $2.87 | +1.41% | 182B | 8.92 | $0.32 | +5.78% |
| CIHKY | $34.97 | -0.63% | 168.9B | 8.94 | $3.91 | +3.89% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 122.7B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| UNCFF | $67.05 | +1.46% | 104.4B | 9.65 | $6.95 | +3.95% |
| UNCRY | $33.42 | +0.88% | 104B | 9.62 | $3.47 | +2.58% |
| BNPQY | $45.14 | +0.00% | 101.9B | 8.18 | $5.51 | +5.83% |
| DBSDF | $35.77 | +6.07% | 101.3B | 11.73 | $3.05 | +4.80% |
| BNPQF | $89.63 | +1.28% | 101.2B | 8.28 | $10.83 | +6.01% |
| IITSF | $5.68 | -0.35% | 101B | 9.79 | $0.58 | +6.54% |
Stock Comparison
QNTO vs CAIXY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 182B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CAIXY trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CIHKY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CIHKY trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CIHHF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs UNCFF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while UNCFF trades at $67.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs UNCRY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while UNCRY trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BNPQY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BNPQY trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs DBSDF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while DBSDF trades at $35.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BNPQF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BNPQF trades at $89.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs IITSF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while IITSF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs DBSDY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while DBSDY trades at $141.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SBKFF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs KBCSY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while KBCSY trades at $51.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BREJY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 46.30. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CHCJY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CHCJY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PBCRF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PBCRF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs AKSJF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs LLOBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while LLOBF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PBCRY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PBCRY trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs EBKDY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while EBKDY trades at $42.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CHBJF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CHBJF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs MZHOF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while MZHOF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs LLDTF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while LLDTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PSBKF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PSBKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs OVCHY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while OVCHY trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CRARY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CRARY trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CRARF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CRARF trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs OVCHF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while OVCHF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs NRDBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while NRDBY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs UOVEY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while UOVEY trades at $56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BHKLY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BHKLY trades at $90.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs STNDF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs NBNKF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while NBNKF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs UOVEF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while UOVEF trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SCGLY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SCGLY trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs DNBBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while DNBBF trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs DNBBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while DNBBY trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs KBCSF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while KBCSF trades at $102.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CWESF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BNKHF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BNKHF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SCGLF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SCGLF trades at $55.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SVKEF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SVKEF trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CRZBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CRZBF trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs JPSTF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while JPSTF trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs JPPTY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CIXPF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CIXPF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CEBCF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CEBCF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CRZBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CRZBY trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKRKY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKRKY trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKRKF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKRKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs DNKEY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while DNKEY trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs EBKOF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while EBKOF trades at $84.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs MLYBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while MLYBY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs JPHLF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while JPHLF trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CMAKY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CMAKY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SWDBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SWDBY trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SWDBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SWDBF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs DNSKF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs HSNGY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while HSNGY trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs JPPHY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while JPPHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PPERY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PPERY trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BLMIF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BLMIF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PPERF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PPERF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PSZKF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PSZKF trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs GBOOF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while GBOOF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PSZKY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PSZKY trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKHPF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs GBOOY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while GBOOY trades at $45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs FCNCB Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while FCNCB trades at $1,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKHYY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKHYY trades at $95.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs HSNGF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while HSNGF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BDORY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BDORY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CKHGY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CKHGY trades at $100.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SBGOF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SBGOF trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SGBLY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SGBLY trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs MLYNF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CMTDF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CMTDF trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CGMBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SUTNY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SUTNY trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs MDIBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while MDIBY trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BDOUF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs AIBRF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while AIBRF trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs CIMDF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while CIMDF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs AIBGY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while AIBGY trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs PBLOF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs ISNPY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while ISNPY trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs GPFOF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while GPFOF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs GPFOY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs SKCBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BPXXY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BPXXY trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs TKGBY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while TKGBY trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKRIY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKRIY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKRIF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKRIF trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs RSNHF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while RSNHF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BNCZF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs OTPBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs FCBBF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FCBBF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while FCBBF trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FCBBF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCBBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to FCBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs EGFEF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while EGFEF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs EGFEY Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while EGFEY trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.
QNTO vs BKPKF Comparison
QNTO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNTO stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNTO is priced at $10.96, while BKPKF trades at $49.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNTO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, QNTO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QNTO is more volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNTO.