IQ Hedge Market Neutral Tracker ETF

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while APO trades at $141.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while FESGX trades at $73.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while SGENX trades at $76.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while FEGRX trades at $77.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while SGIIX trades at $77.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while APO-PA trades at $74.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while GBLEX trades at $39.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while AGVEX trades at $26.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MDLOX trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while FSGGX trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while GLIFX trades at $17.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while GLFOX trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PAVE trades at $43.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while QYLD trades at $16.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JNGTX trades at $70.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JATIX trades at $71.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JAGTX trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while VHGEX trades at $39.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JAGCX trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JATSX trades at $64.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JATAX trades at $67.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JATNX trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while DFGEX trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PRGSX trades at $68.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PAGSX trades at $67.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PRJZX trades at $47.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PRJQX trades at $48.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PGGFX trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while ACWV trades at $118.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CGGO trades at $31.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JDWNX trades at $121.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while GUNR trades at $40.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PRGTX trades at $22.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while IOO trades at $107.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JFNNX trades at $65.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JFNAX trades at $64.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JFNIX trades at $66.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JNGLX trades at $65.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JFNSX trades at $62.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JAGLX trades at $65.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JFNCX trades at $55.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JWGRX trades at $124.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JDWAX trades at $123.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JWWFX trades at $124.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JWWCX trades at $117.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JAWWX trades at $121.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JDWRX trades at $121.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while REET trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CTCAX trades at $94.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CTHCX trades at $79.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while VNQI trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNQI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CGTUX trades at $103.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CMTFX trades at $100.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CTHRX trades at $102.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while DGSIX trades at $22.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while BGHIX trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, URA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while URA trades at $38.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URA's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to URA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MGGPX trades at $38.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MGGIX trades at $40.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while IXJ trades at $86.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while XYLD trades at $38.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while LGMAX trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while LGMCX trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while LSWWX trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while GNR trades at $54.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MSFBX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MSFBX trades at $34.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFBX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to MSFBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MSFLX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MSFLX trades at $34.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to MSFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while ARTGX trades at $26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while APHGX trades at $26.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while APDGX trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while BOTZ trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MLPX trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while NFRA trades at $61.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while VGWLX trades at $26.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JORIX trades at $20.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JORAX trades at $20.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JORFX trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while VGWAX trades at $33.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JORNX trades at $20.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JSLNX trades at $20.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JORRX trades at $19.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while DFGR trades at $26.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while SGTTX trades at $79.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while CSGZX trades at $78.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while OPGIX trades at $50.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while BIALX trades at $30.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while JORCX trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while GCOW trades at $37.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, FTGC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while FTGC trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to FTGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while PFFD trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is less volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, MWEFX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while MWEFX trades at $46.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWEFX's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to MWEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while IILGX trades at $29.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while SGTRX trades at $69.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, VMVFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while VMVFX trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMVFX's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMVFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to VMVFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.

QMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QMN stands at 0. In comparison, VMNVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMN is priced at $24.84, while VMNVX trades at $33.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QMN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMNVX's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, QMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMNVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMN is more volatile compared to VMNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMN.