BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF QLTY.AX Peers
See (QLTY.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLTY.AX | A$32.64 | +0.77% | 737.8M | 27.11 | A$1.20 | +3.01% |
IOO.AX | A$164.21 | +0.87% | 6.8B | 25.29 | A$6.49 | +1.13% |
IXJ.AX | A$131.07 | +0.05% | 4.6B | 24.07 | A$5.45 | +1.63% |
ETHI.AX | A$15.90 | +0.63% | 3.6B | 21.68 | A$0.73 | +2.40% |
IXI.AX | A$99.56 | +0.28% | 1.4B | 23.22 | A$4.29 | +2.44% |
IFRA.AX | A$22.58 | +0.36% | 1.4B | 20.47 | A$1.10 | +3.10% |
PGF.AX | A$2.63 | +3.95% | 1.3B | 8.77 | A$0.30 | +4.18% |
HACK.AX | A$15.67 | -0.13% | 1.2B | 32.42 | A$0.48 | +0.50% |
WGB.AX | A$2.50 | +0.00% | 892.9M | 7.35 | A$0.34 | +5.00% |
NGI.AX | A$1.70 | +0.00% | 833.1M | 3.47 | A$0.49 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
QLTY.AX vs IOO.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, IOO.AX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while IOO.AX trades at A$164.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas IOO.AX's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs IXJ.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, IXJ.AX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while IXJ.AX trades at A$131.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas IXJ.AX's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IXJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs ETHI.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, ETHI.AX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while ETHI.AX trades at A$15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas ETHI.AX's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETHI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to ETHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs IXI.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, IXI.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while IXI.AX trades at A$99.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas IXI.AX's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IXI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs IFRA.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, IFRA.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while IFRA.AX trades at A$22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas IFRA.AX's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IFRA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs PGF.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, PGF.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while PGF.AX trades at A$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas PGF.AX's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGF.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to PGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs HACK.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, HACK.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while HACK.AX trades at A$15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas HACK.AX's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HACK.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to HACK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs WGB.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, WGB.AX has a market cap of 892.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while WGB.AX trades at A$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas WGB.AX's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGB.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to WGB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs NGI.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, NGI.AX has a market cap of 833.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while NGI.AX trades at A$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas NGI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGI.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to NGI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs VVLU.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, VVLU.AX has a market cap of 787.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while VVLU.AX trades at A$74.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas VVLU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVLU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to VVLU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs FGG.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, FGG.AX has a market cap of 604.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while FGG.AX trades at A$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas FGG.AX's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGG.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs IHOO.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, IHOO.AX has a market cap of 481.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while IHOO.AX trades at A$194.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas IHOO.AX's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IHOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs VBLD.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, VBLD.AX has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while VBLD.AX trades at A$72.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas VBLD.AX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to VBLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs WCMQ.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, WCMQ.AX has a market cap of 435.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while WCMQ.AX trades at A$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas WCMQ.AX's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCMQ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to WCMQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs DJRE.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, DJRE.AX has a market cap of 431.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while DJRE.AX trades at A$21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas DJRE.AX's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DJRE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to DJRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs ALI.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, ALI.AX has a market cap of 405.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while ALI.AX trades at A$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas ALI.AX's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALI.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to ALI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs WDIV.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, WDIV.AX has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while WDIV.AX trades at A$20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas WDIV.AX's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDIV.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to WDIV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs RBTZ.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, RBTZ.AX has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while RBTZ.AX trades at A$14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas RBTZ.AX's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTZ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to RBTZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs GVF.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, GVF.AX has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while GVF.AX trades at A$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas GVF.AX's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GVF.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to GVF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs ESTX.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, ESTX.AX has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while ESTX.AX trades at A$105.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas ESTX.AX's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESTX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ESTX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs FEMX.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, FEMX.AX has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while FEMX.AX trades at A$6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas FEMX.AX's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to FEMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs TGF.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, TGF.AX has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while TGF.AX trades at A$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas TGF.AX's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGF.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to TGF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs FUEL.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, FUEL.AX has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while FUEL.AX trades at A$6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas FUEL.AX's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUEL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to FUEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs GDC.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, GDC.AX has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while GDC.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas GDC.AX's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDC.AX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to GDC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs MNRS.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, MNRS.AX has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while MNRS.AX trades at A$9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas MNRS.AX's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNRS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to MNRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs BNKS.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, BNKS.AX has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while BNKS.AX trades at A$9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas BNKS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to BNKS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs ZYAU.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, ZYAU.AX has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while ZYAU.AX trades at A$8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas ZYAU.AX's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYAU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ZYAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs ZYUS.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, ZYUS.AX has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while ZYUS.AX trades at A$14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas ZYUS.AX's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYUS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ZYUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs FOOD.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, FOOD.AX has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while FOOD.AX trades at A$6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas FOOD.AX's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FOOD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs GFL.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, GFL.AX has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while GFL.AX trades at A$3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas GFL.AX's P/E ratio is -34.27. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to GFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs UBW.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, UBW.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while UBW.AX trades at A$28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas UBW.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBW.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to UBW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs CURE.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, CURE.AX has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while CURE.AX trades at A$43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas CURE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to CURE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs FPC.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, FPC.AX has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while FPC.AX trades at A$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas FPC.AX's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPC.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FPC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs HGEN.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, HGEN.AX has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while HGEN.AX trades at A$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas HGEN.AX's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGEN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to HGEN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs VMIN.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, VMIN.AX has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while VMIN.AX trades at A$64.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas VMIN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMIN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to VMIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs GOLD.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, GOLD.AX has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while GOLD.AX trades at A$46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas GOLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to GOLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs UBP.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, UBP.AX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while UBP.AX trades at A$28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas UBP.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBP.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to UBP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs APL.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, APL.AX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while APL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas APL.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APL.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to APL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs UBJ.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, UBJ.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while UBJ.AX trades at A$23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas UBJ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to UBJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs WRLD.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, WRLD.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while WRLD.AX trades at A$20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas WRLD.AX's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to WRLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs MGF.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, MGF.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while MGF.AX trades at A$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas MGF.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGF.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to MGF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs MHG.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, MHG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while MHG.AX trades at A$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas MHG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to MHG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs CGA.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, CGA.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while CGA.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas CGA.AX's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGA.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to CGA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.
QLTY.AX vs HYGG.AX Comparison
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 737.8M. In comparison, HYGG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$32.64, while HYGG.AX trades at A$7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 27.11, whereas HYGG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to HYGG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.