BetaShares - Global Quality Leaders ETF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for QLTY.AX
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for QLTY.AX
BetaShares - Global Quality Leaders ETF (QLTY.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QLTY.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLTY.AX | A$31.03 | +0.19% | 927.9M | 26.98 | A$1.15 | +2.47% |
| GOLD.AX | A$61.72 | -1.33% | 6.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IOO.AX | A$177.46 | +0.32% | 5.2B | 26.51 | A$6.66 | +1.14% |
| ETHI.AX | A$14.98 | -0.66% | 3.6B | 22.52 | A$0.67 | +2.31% |
| IFRA.AX | A$25.72 | +0.59% | 1.9B | 19.40 | A$1.33 | +2.99% |
| IXJ.AX | A$133.34 | -0.49% | 1.4B | 25.84 | A$5.20 | +1.55% |
| PGF.AX | A$2.95 | +0.68% | 1.4B | 4.55 | A$0.64 | +4.47% |
| HACK.AX | A$11.84 | -6.85% | 1.1B | 26.78 | A$0.46 | +3.53% |
| VVLU.AX | A$77.73 | -0.24% | 1.1B | N/A | N/A | +8.04% |
| NGI.AX | A$2.10 | -2.78% | 1.1B | 17.83 | A$0.12 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
QLTY.AX vs GOLD.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, GOLD.AX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while GOLD.AX trades at A$61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas GOLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to GOLD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check GOLD.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs IOO.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, IOO.AX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while IOO.AX trades at A$177.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas IOO.AX's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check IOO.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs ETHI.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, ETHI.AX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while ETHI.AX trades at A$14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas ETHI.AX's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETHI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to ETHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check ETHI.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs IFRA.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, IFRA.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while IFRA.AX trades at A$25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas IFRA.AX's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to IFRA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check IFRA.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs IXJ.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, IXJ.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while IXJ.AX trades at A$133.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas IXJ.AX's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IXJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check IXJ.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs PGF.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, PGF.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while PGF.AX trades at A$2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas PGF.AX's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGF.AX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to PGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check PGF.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs HACK.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, HACK.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while HACK.AX trades at A$11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas HACK.AX's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HACK.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to HACK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check HACK.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs VVLU.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, VVLU.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while VVLU.AX trades at A$77.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas VVLU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVLU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to VVLU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check VVLU.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs NGI.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, NGI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while NGI.AX trades at A$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas NGI.AX's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGI.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to NGI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check NGI.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs WGB.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, WGB.AX has a market cap of 824.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while WGB.AX trades at A$2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas WGB.AX's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGB.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to WGB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check WGB.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs IHOO.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, IHOO.AX has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while IHOO.AX trades at A$228.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas IHOO.AX's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to IHOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check IHOO.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs FGG.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, FGG.AX has a market cap of 629.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while FGG.AX trades at A$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas FGG.AX's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGG.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check FGG.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs VBLD.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, VBLD.AX has a market cap of 606.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while VBLD.AX trades at A$76.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas VBLD.AX's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to VBLD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check VBLD.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs DJRE.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, DJRE.AX has a market cap of 510.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while DJRE.AX trades at A$21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas DJRE.AX's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DJRE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to DJRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check DJRE.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs ALI.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, ALI.AX has a market cap of 432.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while ALI.AX trades at A$2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas ALI.AX's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ALI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check ALI.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs WCMQ.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, WCMQ.AX has a market cap of 365M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while WCMQ.AX trades at A$9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas WCMQ.AX's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCMQ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to WCMQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check WCMQ.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs WDIV.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, WDIV.AX has a market cap of 359.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while WDIV.AX trades at A$21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas WDIV.AX's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDIV.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to WDIV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check WDIV.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs RBTZ.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, RBTZ.AX has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while RBTZ.AX trades at A$14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas RBTZ.AX's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTZ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to RBTZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check RBTZ.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs ESTX.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, ESTX.AX has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while ESTX.AX trades at A$107.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas ESTX.AX's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESTX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ESTX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check ESTX.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs GVF.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, GVF.AX has a market cap of 266.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while GVF.AX trades at A$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas GVF.AX's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GVF.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to GVF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check GVF.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs MNRS.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, MNRS.AX has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while MNRS.AX trades at A$17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas MNRS.AX's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNRS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to MNRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check MNRS.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs TGF.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, TGF.AX has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while TGF.AX trades at A$2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas TGF.AX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGF.AX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to TGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check TGF.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs FEMX.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, FEMX.AX has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while FEMX.AX trades at A$7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas FEMX.AX's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FEMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check FEMX.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs FUEL.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, FUEL.AX has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while FUEL.AX trades at A$8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas FUEL.AX's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUEL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FUEL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check FUEL.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs BNKS.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, BNKS.AX has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while BNKS.AX trades at A$12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas BNKS.AX's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to BNKS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check BNKS.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs IXI.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, IXI.AX has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while IXI.AX trades at A$96.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas IXI.AX's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to IXI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check IXI.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs GDC.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, GDC.AX has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while GDC.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas GDC.AX's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDC.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to GDC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check GDC.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs ZYAU.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, ZYAU.AX has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while ZYAU.AX trades at A$10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas ZYAU.AX's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYAU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ZYAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check ZYAU.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs ZYUS.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, ZYUS.AX has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while ZYUS.AX trades at A$14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas ZYUS.AX's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYUS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to ZYUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check ZYUS.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs FOOD.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, FOOD.AX has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while FOOD.AX trades at A$8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas FOOD.AX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to FOOD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check FOOD.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs WRLD.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, WRLD.AX has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while WRLD.AX trades at A$21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas WRLD.AX's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to WRLD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check WRLD.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs HGEN.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, HGEN.AX has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while HGEN.AX trades at A$9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas HGEN.AX's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGEN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to HGEN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check HGEN.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs FPC.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, FPC.AX has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while FPC.AX trades at A$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas FPC.AX's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPC.AX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to FPC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check FPC.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs CURE.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, CURE.AX has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while CURE.AX trades at A$63.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas CURE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to CURE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check CURE.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs UBW.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, UBW.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while UBW.AX trades at A$28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas UBW.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBW.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to UBW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check UBW.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs GFL.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, GFL.AX has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while GFL.AX trades at A$2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas GFL.AX's P/E ratio is 72.50. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFL.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to GFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check GFL.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs APL.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, APL.AX has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while APL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas APL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APL.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to APL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check APL.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs VMIN.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, VMIN.AX has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while VMIN.AX trades at A$62.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas VMIN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMIN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to VMIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check VMIN.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs UBP.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, UBP.AX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while UBP.AX trades at A$28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas UBP.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBP.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to UBP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check UBP.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs UBJ.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, UBJ.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while UBJ.AX trades at A$23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas UBJ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to UBJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check UBJ.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs MGF.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, MGF.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while MGF.AX trades at A$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas MGF.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGF.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to MGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check MGF.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs HYGG.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, HYGG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while HYGG.AX trades at A$5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas HYGG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is less volatile compared to HYGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check HYGG.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs MHG.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, MHG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while MHG.AX trades at A$3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas MHG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to MHG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check MHG.AX's competition here
QLTY.AX vs CGA.AX Comparison April 2026
QLTY.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTY.AX stands at 927.9M. In comparison, CGA.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QLTY.AX is priced at A$31.03, while CGA.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTY.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 26.98, whereas CGA.AX's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, QLTY.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGA.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTY.AX is more volatile compared to CGA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTY.AX.Check CGA.AX's competition here