GMO International Quality ETF
GMO International Quality ETF QLTI Peers
See (QLTI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLTI | $25.11 | +0.38% | 36.04M | 27.89 | $0.90 | +0.17% |
| VOO | $546.28 | +0.65% | 1.35T | 26.49 | $20.62 | +1.28% |
| VFINX | $546.75 | +0.44% | 1.33T | 26.31 | $20.78 | +1.28% |
| VITSX | $141.46 | +0.39% | 1.20T | 25.52 | $5.54 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $141.43 | +0.39% | 1.20T | 25.52 | $5.54 | +0.01% |
| VTI | $292.71 | +0.73% | 607.00B | 25.71 | $11.39 | +1.28% |
| IVV | $597.11 | +0.66% | 594.21B | 25.89 | $23.06 | +1.30% |
| FXAIX | $205.71 | +0.44% | 593.97B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SPY | $594.23 | +0.64% | 545.37B | 25.89 | $22.95 | +1.21% |
| VXUS | $66.29 | +0.12% | 474.37B | 16.24 | $4.08 | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
QLTI vs VOO Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.35T. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VOO trades at $546.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VFINX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.33T. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VFINX trades at $546.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VITSX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.20T. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VITSX trades at $141.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTSAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.20T. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTSAX trades at $141.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTI Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 607.00B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTI trades at $292.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs IVV Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 594.21B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while IVV trades at $597.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FXAIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 593.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FXAIX trades at $205.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs SPY Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 545.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while SPY trades at $594.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VXUS Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 474.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VXUS trades at $66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTSNX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 469.79B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTSNX trades at $142.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VMCPX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 340.87B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VMCPX trades at $365.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VIMAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 312.87B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VIMAX trades at $335.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VIIIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 291.35B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VIIIX trades at $481.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VINIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 290.08B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VINIX trades at $481.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RGAGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 279.56B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RGAGX trades at $76.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs GAFFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 271.15B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while GAFFX trades at $76.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AGTHX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 270.79B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AGTHX trades at $76.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs GFAFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 268.21B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while GFAFX trades at $75.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RGABX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 240.84B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RGABX trades at $68.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RGAAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 236.88B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RGAAX trades at $66.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RLBGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 233.40B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RLBGX trades at $35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs ABALX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while ABALX trades at $35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AFMBX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AFMBX trades at $35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AMBFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AMBFX trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs BALFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while BALFX trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs GFACX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 231.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while GFACX trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VEA Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 216.92B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VEA trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTMNX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 216.53B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTMNX trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VDIPX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 214.06B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VDIPX trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VB Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 207.35B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VB trades at $234.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs QQQ Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 205.01B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while QQQ trades at $521.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs BX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 191.48B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while BX trades at $146.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 44.45. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTV Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 187.52B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTV trades at $173.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VO Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 178.60B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VO trades at $274.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs BLK Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 153.31B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while BLK trades at $989.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FCTDX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 148.40B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FCTDX trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AICCX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 147.90B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AICCX trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RICBX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RICBX trades at $58.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AIVSX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AIVSX trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RICAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RICAX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AICFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AICFX trades at $59.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FCNTX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 145.11B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FCNTX trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FCNKX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 144.85B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FCNKX trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AWSHX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 142.50B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AWSHX trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RWMFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 142.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RWMFX trades at $63.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FWMIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 142.42B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FWMIX trades at $63.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs C-PN Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 142.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while C-PN trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs CWMAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 142.01B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while CWMAX trades at $63.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs WSHFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 141.70B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while WSHFX trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs ANWPX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 140.86B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while ANWPX trades at $66.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FNPFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FNPFX trades at $66.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RNPGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RNPGX trades at $66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs NPFFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while NPFFX trades at $65.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs WSHCX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 139.63B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while WSHCX trades at $62.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RWMBX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 139.23B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RWMBX trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs IEFA Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 135.14B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while IEFA trades at $81.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs CFNAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 135.06B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while CFNAX trades at $83.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AFIFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AFIFX trades at $83.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs ANCFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while ANCFX trades at $83.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AEGFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 127.18B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AEGFX trades at $59.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AEPFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 127.17B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AEPFX trades at $59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RERHX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 127.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RERHX trades at $58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AEPGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AEPGX trades at $59.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RERGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RERGX trades at $59.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AGG Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 122.86B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AGG trades at $97.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 124.55. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs IWF Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 113.68B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while IWF trades at $401.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs KKR Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 112.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while KKR trades at $125.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 54.27. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VWENX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 107.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VWENX trades at $75.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VWELX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 107.43B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VWELX trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VSCIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 107.23B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VSCIX trades at $111.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs NAESX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 107.22B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while NAESX trades at $111.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VIG Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 103.74B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VIG trades at $199.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTTHX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 103.36B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTTHX trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VDADX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 101.79B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VDADX trades at $53.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VUG Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 100.52B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VUG trades at $415.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 37.77. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs SEEGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while SEEGX trades at $79.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs JLGMX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while JLGMX trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs JLGRX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while JLGRX trades at $82.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs FSKAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while FSKAX trades at $162.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs BN Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 98.46B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while BN trades at $59.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 206.09. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs BAM Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 97.78B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while BAM trades at $59.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 43.91. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTHRX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 96.94B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTHRX trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs TBCIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 94.59B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while TBCIX trades at $188.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs TRBCX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 93.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while TRBCX trades at $187.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs IJH Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 93.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while IJH trades at $61.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VFORX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 92.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VFORX trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs DODGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 91.34B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while DODGX trades at $261.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs PABGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 90.74B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while PABGX trades at $180.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VTIVX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 90.62B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VTIVX trades at $31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VGT Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 90.40B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VGT trades at $616.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VITAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 90.09B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VITAX trades at $315.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RAFFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 87.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RAFFX trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VIEIX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 85.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VIEIX trades at $140.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs VEMAX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 84.67B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while VEMAX trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs RRBGX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 84.55B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while RRBGX trades at $168.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AMCPX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 83.21B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AMCPX trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs AMPFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 83.19B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while AMPFX trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs PRUFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 82.78B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while PRUFX trades at $104.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.
QLTI vs PRGFX Comparison
QLTI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTI stands at 36.04M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 82.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTI is priced at $25.11, while PRGFX trades at $104.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.89, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, QLTI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTI is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTI.