iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF QLTA Peers
See (QLTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLTA | $47.68 | -0.06% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.20% |
| BND | $73.26 | -0.11% | 356.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.75% |
| VBMFX | $9.66 | -0.21% | 355B | N/A | N/A | +3.64% |
| VBMPX | $9.66 | -0.21% | 355B | N/A | N/A | +3.76% |
| VBTIX | $9.66 | -0.21% | 355B | N/A | N/A | +3.75% |
| VBTLX | $9.66 | -0.21% | 354.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.76% |
| VTBNX | $9.53 | -0.21% | 307.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.83% |
| BNDX | $49.29 | -0.32% | 104.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.30% |
| VTABX | $19.71 | -0.15% | 104.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.26% |
| VTIFX | $29.58 | -0.14% | 104.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.29% |
Stock Comparison
QLTA vs BND Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BND has a market cap of 356.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BND trades at $73.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBMFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBMFX has a market cap of 355B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBMFX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBMFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBMPX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBMPX has a market cap of 355B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBMPX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBMPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBTIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBTIX has a market cap of 355B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBTIX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBTIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBTLX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBTLX has a market cap of 354.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBTLX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBTLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VTBNX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VTBNX has a market cap of 307.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VTBNX trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTBNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTBNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VTBNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BNDX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNDX has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BNDX trades at $49.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VTABX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VTABX has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VTABX trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTABX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTABX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VTABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VTIFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VTIFX has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VTIFX trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VTIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BFAFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BFAFX has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BFAFX trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBIRX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBIRX has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBIRX trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FXNAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FXNAX has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FXNAX trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FXNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VCIT Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCIT has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VCIT trades at $82.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VCIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VICSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VICSX has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VICSX trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VICSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VICSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BAGIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAGIX has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BAGIX trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BAGSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAGSX has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BAGSX trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs JCBZX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCBZX has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while JCBZX trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCBZX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to JCBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs TLT Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TLT has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while TLT trades at $87.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLT's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to TLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs WOBDX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WOBDX has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while WOBDX trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOBDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOBDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to WOBDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs SGOV Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SGOV has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while SGOV trades at $100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGOV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to SGOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BIV Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BIV has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BIV trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBILX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBILX has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBILX trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBILX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBILX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBILX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VCSH Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCSH has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VCSH trades at $79.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VCSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VSCSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VSCSX has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VSCSX trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VSCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FTBFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTBFX has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FTBFX trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FTBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VTEAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VTEAX has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VTEAX trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTEAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTEAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VTEAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BCOIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BCOIX has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BCOIX trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BCOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BCOSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BCOSX has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BCOSX trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCOSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BCOSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IEF Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IEF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IEF trades at $95.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEF's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs MWTSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MWTSX has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while MWTSX trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to MWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IUSB Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IUSB has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IUSB trades at $46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSB's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IUSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs MWTRX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MWTRX has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while MWTRX trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to MWTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs MWTIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MWTIX has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while MWTIX trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to MWTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs LQD Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LQD has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while LQD trades at $109.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQD's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to LQD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs DBLTX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DBLTX has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while DBLTX trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to DBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs DLTNX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DLTNX has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while DLTNX trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to DLTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs PTRQX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PTRQX has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while PTRQX trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRQX's P/E ratio is 60.80. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTRQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to PTRQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs PDBZX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PDBZX has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while PDBZX trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDBZX's P/E ratio is 60.85. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to PDBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs GIBLX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIBLX has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while GIBLX trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to GIBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs GIBIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIBIX has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while GIBIX trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to GIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs GIBRX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIBRX has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while GIBRX trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to GIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs GIBCX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIBCX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while GIBCX trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to GIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs GIBAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIBAX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while GIBAX trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to GIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs JHNBX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JHNBX has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while JHNBX trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHNBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHNBX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to JHNBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs JBFRX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JBFRX has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while JBFRX trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBFRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to JBFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs JHBIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JHBIX has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while JHBIX trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to JHBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IBFFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IBFFX has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IBFFX trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs AFTFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AFTFX has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while AFTFX trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to AFTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs USHY Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, USHY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while USHY trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USHY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to USHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs NHMCX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NHMCX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while NHMCX trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to NHMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IGSB Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IGSB has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IGSB trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IGSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs LBNVX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LBNVX has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while LBNVX trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to LBNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs SHV Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHV has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while SHV trades at $110.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to SHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs ANBEX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ANBEX has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while ANBEX trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANBEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANBEX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to ANBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FBND Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FBND has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FBND trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBND's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FBND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs HYG Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HYG has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while HYG trades at $80.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYG's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to HYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs PFORX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PFORX has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while PFORX trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to PFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs PFOAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PFOAX has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while PFOAX trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to PFOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs PFBPX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PFBPX has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while PFBPX trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFBPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFBPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to PFBPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FTRBX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTRBX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FTRBX trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTRBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FTRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VUBFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VUBFX has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VUBFX trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUBFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VUBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VCOBX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCOBX has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VCOBX trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCOBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCOBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VCOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VCORX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCORX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VCORX trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCORX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VCORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs USIG Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, USIG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while USIG trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to USIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BFIFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BFIFX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BFIFX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFIFX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs NHCCX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NHCCX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while NHCCX trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHCCX's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to NHCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs NHMRX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NHMRX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while NHMRX trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMRX's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to NHMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs NHMAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NHMAX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while NHMAX trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAX's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to NHMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs NHMFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NHMFX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while NHMFX trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMFX's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to NHMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs LUBAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LUBAX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while LUBAX trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUBAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to LUBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBLTX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBLTX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBLTX trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VCLT Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCLT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VCLT trades at $75.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to VCLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs TLH Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TLH has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while TLH trades at $100.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to TLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VLTCX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VLTCX has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VLTCX trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLTCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VLTCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BIMSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BIMSX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BIMSX trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BIMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BSBIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BSBIX has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BSBIX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BSBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BSBSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BSBSX has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BSBSX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FBNDX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FBNDX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FBNDX trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FBNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FIPDX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FIPDX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FIPDX trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIPDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FIPDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FIKQX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FIKQX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FIKQX trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIKQX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIKQX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FIKQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs RCWAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RCWAX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while RCWAX trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCWAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to RCWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs WBFFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WBFFX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while WBFFX trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to WBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs STYAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STYAX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while STYAX trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to STYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs WIPIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WIPIX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while WIPIX trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIPIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIPIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to WIPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs SUB Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while SUB trades at $106.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to SUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IIBZX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IIBZX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IIBZX trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IIBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IIBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IIBAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IIBAX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IIBAX trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs IICIX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IICIX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while IICIX trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IICIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IICIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to IICIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs PTIAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PTIAX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while PTIAX trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to PTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs SPIB Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPIB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while SPIB trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to SPIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BLV Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLV has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BLV trades at $69.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to BLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs SPAB Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPAB has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while SPAB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to SPAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FLOT Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FLOT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FLOT trades at $50.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FLOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs BUBSX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BUBSX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while BUBSX trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to BUBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs SCHI Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCHI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while SCHI trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to SCHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs VBLAX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBLAX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while VBLAX trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBLAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to VBLAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs FUTBX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FUTBX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while FUTBX trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to FUTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs JNK Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JNK has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while JNK trades at $96.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNK's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is less volatile compared to JNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.
QLTA vs TRBFX Comparison
QLTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLTA stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TRBFX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLTA is priced at $47.68, while TRBFX trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLTA is more volatile compared to TRBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLTA.