Quilter plc
Quilter plc QLT.L Peers
See (QLT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLT.L | £156.90 | +0.00% | 2.1B | -52.73 | -£0.03 | +3.76% |
| UC65.L | £60.61 | +0.00% | 5.4T | N/A | N/A | +1.65% |
| UB02.L | £4,424.00 | +0.00% | 3.9T | N/A | N/A | +1.80% |
| IUSA.L | £4,495.13 | +0.00% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.06% |
| SSAC.L | £7,120.50 | +0.00% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £43,080.00 | +0.00% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,314.00 | +0.00% | 837.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | £7,902.00 | +0.00% | 783.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,796.50 | +0.00% | 783.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| MEUD.L | £22,205.00 | +0.00% | 767.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QLT.L vs UC65.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UC65.L trades at £60.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UB02.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UB02.L trades at £4,424.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IUSA.L trades at £4,495.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SSAC.L trades at £7,120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while EQGB.L trades at £43,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 837.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SMEA.L trades at £7,314.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XESC.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 783.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XESC.L trades at £7,902.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XESX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 783.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XESX.L trades at £4,796.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 767.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while MEUD.L trades at £22,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IITU.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 760.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IITU.L trades at £2,647.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 722.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UB0D.L trades at £2,212.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 677.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while JPSR.L trades at £1,989.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs JT13.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 663.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while JT13.L trades at £588.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 637.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CNAL.L trades at £11,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 551.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IWRD.L trades at £6,244.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 534.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XDAX.L trades at £19,228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 495.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while PHGP.L trades at £22,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 487.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XMMS.L trades at £4,773.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 483.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while GLDA.L trades at £9,517.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 465.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while MXWS.L trades at £9,209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 442B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XMUS.L trades at £13,443.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UC44.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 425.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UC44.L trades at £12,822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 415.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XMEU.L trades at £8,353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CS51.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 410.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CS51.L trades at £17,256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs EUE.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 367.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while EUE.L trades at £4,672.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 366.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IEEM.L trades at £3,494.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UB32.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 351.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UB32.L trades at £8,931.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CACX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 339.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CACX.L trades at £6,637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 304.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SEMA.L trades at £3,298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 302.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XSX6.L trades at £11,763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 294.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while GBSS.L trades at £22,004.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 291.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,327.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 273.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IWFV.L trades at £3,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 269.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SGBX.L trades at £22,971.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 248.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while ISPY.L trades at £2,373.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 235.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CEA1.L trades at £14,992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while RBTX.L trades at £1,101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SUES.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SUES.L trades at £612.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while JRDE.L trades at £3,660.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs JERE.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while JERE.L trades at £3,897.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 205.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while PHSP.L trades at £2,400.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 201.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IUQF.L trades at £1,109.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while HMEF.L trades at £892.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 194.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IWFM.L trades at £6,617.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XDEV.L trades at £3,763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SOYU.L trades at £308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CEUR.L trades at £30,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 169.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UIFS.L trades at £1,116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XXSC.L trades at £5,590.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SPGP.L trades at £1,741.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,422.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while PRIR.L trades at £1,489.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while GBSP.L trades at £1,693.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CU1.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 142.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CU1.L trades at £46,492.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IEFV.L trades at £868.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while ISP6.L trades at £6,494.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IPRP.L trades at £2,711.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs WATL.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while WATL.L trades at £5,787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs GILS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while GILS.L trades at £10,211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CUS1.L trades at £38,297.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XZEU.L trades at £2,805.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XCX6.L trades at £1,319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UC79.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UC79.L trades at £1,156.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SP5G.L trades at £209.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 65.40. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs INFL.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CSPX.L trades at £659.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while 0GWB.IL trades at £474.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CG1.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CG1.L trades at £36,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CB5.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CB5.L trades at £3,909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XRSG.L trades at £23,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IGSG.L trades at £5,924.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while PRIC.L trades at £1,634.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IJPN.L trades at £1,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while JRDM.L trades at £2,375.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SPEX.L trades at £4,462.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs SPES.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while SPES.L trades at £4,202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IWDA.L trades at £117.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XDEM.L trades at £5,569.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs H50E.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while H50E.L trades at £4,863.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while RIEG.L trades at £1,437.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IEUX.L trades at £4,010.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IMV.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IMV.L trades at £5,714.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while DAXX.L trades at £18,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs TRXS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while TRXS.L trades at £3,383.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CSCA.L trades at £17,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while MTIX.L trades at £14,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,424.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs UB45.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while UB45.L trades at £6,180.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IUKD.L trades at £831.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while WQDS.L trades at £550.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XLKQ.L trades at £54,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XDN0.L trades at £4,182.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while EQDS.L trades at £542.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CRPX.L trades at £13,126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while CSP1.L trades at £48,148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while IGUS.L trades at £14,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs COMM.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while COMM.L trades at £531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.
QLT.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
QLT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLT.L stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLT.L is priced at £156.90, while XDEB.L trades at £3,564.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -52.73, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLT.L's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLT.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLT.L.