IQ Hedge Long/Short Tracker ETF
IQ Hedge Long/Short Tracker ETF QLS Peers
See (QLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLS | $25.09 | +0.72% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VFINX | $572.06 | -0.11% | 1.5T | 26.93 | $21.24 | +1.23% |
| VOO | $570.27 | +0.44% | 1.5T | 27.06 | $21.07 | +1.23% |
| VITSX | $147.95 | -0.05% | 1.3T | 26.17 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $147.93 | -0.05% | 1.3T | 26.18 | $5.65 | +1.22% |
| FXAIX | $215.87 | -0.11% | 658.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $305.53 | +0.53% | 633.6B | 26.33 | $11.61 | +1.23% |
| IVV | $623.39 | +0.44% | 597.8B | 26.82 | $23.24 | +1.29% |
| SPY | $620.38 | +0.44% | 569.4B | 26.82 | $23.13 | +1.16% |
| VTSNX | $148.39 | +0.01% | 508B | 16.54 | $8.97 | +2.83% |
Stock Comparison
QLS vs VFINX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VFINX trades at $572.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VOO Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VOO trades at $570.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VITSX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VITSX trades at $147.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTSAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTSAX trades at $147.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FXAIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 658.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FXAIX trades at $215.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTI Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 633.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTI trades at $305.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs IVV Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 597.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while IVV trades at $623.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs SPY Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 569.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while SPY trades at $620.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTSNX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 508B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTSNX trades at $148.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VXUS Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 501.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VXUS trades at $69.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VMCPX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 353.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VMCPX trades at $379.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VIMAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 324.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VIMAX trades at $348.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VINIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 312.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VINIX trades at $503.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VIIIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 312.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VIIIX trades at $503.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RGAGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 289.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RGAGX trades at $81.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs GAFFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while GAFFX trades at $81.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AGTHX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 288.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AGTHX trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs GFAFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 285.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while GFAFX trades at $80.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RGABX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 256.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RGABX trades at $72.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RGAAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 252B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RGAAX trades at $71.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AMBFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 247.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AMBFX trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs ABALX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 247.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while ABALX trades at $36.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AFMBX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 247.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AFMBX trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs BALFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 246.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while BALFX trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs GFACX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 246B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while GFACX trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RLBGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 242.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RLBGX trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VDIPX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 232.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VDIPX trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VEA Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VEA trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTMNX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTMNX trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs QQQ Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while QQQ trades at $550.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VB Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 213.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VB trades at $241.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTV Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 194.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTV trades at $178.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VO Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VO trades at $282.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs BX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 181.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while BX trades at $153.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 46.52. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs BLK Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while BLK trades at $1,070.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AIVSX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 163.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AIVSX trades at $62.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RICBX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RICBX trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FCNTX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 162.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FCNTX trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AICFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AICFX trades at $62.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RICAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RICAX trades at $61.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FCTDX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 159.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FCTDX trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs C-PN Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 159.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while C-PN trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FCNKX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FCNKX trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AICCX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AICCX trades at $61.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FNPFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FNPFX trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RNPGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RNPGX trades at $69.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs NPFFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while NPFFX trades at $68.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AFIFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AFIFX trades at $87.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs ANCFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while ANCFX trades at $87.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs ANWPX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 148.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while ANWPX trades at $69.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs CFNAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while CFNAX trades at $87.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AWSHX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 143.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AWSHX trades at $63.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RWMFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RWMFX trades at $63.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FWMIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FWMIX trades at $63.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs CWMAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 143B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while CWMAX trades at $63.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs WSHFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while WSHFX trades at $63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs WSHCX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while WSHCX trades at $62.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RWMBX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RWMBX trades at $62.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs IEFA Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while IEFA trades at $83.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RERGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RERGX trades at $60.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AEPGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AEPGX trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AEGFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AEGFX trades at $60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RERHX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RERHX trades at $59.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AEPFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AEPFX trades at $60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AGG Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 127.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AGG trades at $98.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.88. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs IWF Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 119.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while IWF trades at $423.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs KKR Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while KKR trades at $134.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VWENX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VWENX trades at $77.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VWELX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VWELX trades at $45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs SEEGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while SEEGX trades at $83.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs JLGRX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while JLGRX trades at $86.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs NAESX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while NAESX trades at $114.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VSCIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VSCIX trades at $114.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs FSKAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while FSKAX trades at $170.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTTHX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTTHX trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VDADX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VDADX trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VIG Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VIG trades at $206.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs JLGMX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while JLGMX trades at $88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VUG Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VUG trades at $437.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 38.77. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VGT Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VGT trades at $664.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs BN Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while BN trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 216.10. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs TBCIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while TBCIX trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTHRX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTHRX trades at $40.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VITAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VITAX trades at $336.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs TRBCX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while TRBCX trades at $198.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VTIVX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VTIVX trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs IJH Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while IJH trades at $63.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VFORX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VFORX trades at $47.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs PABGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while PABGX trades at $191.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs DODGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while DODGX trades at $273.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RRBGX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RRBGX trades at $178.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs BAM Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while BAM trades at $55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VIEIX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VIEIX trades at $146.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs RAFFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while RAFFX trades at $45.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs VEMAX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while VEMAX trades at $41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs PRUFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while PRUFX trades at $110.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs PRGFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 86.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while PRGFX trades at $109.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AMCPX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AMCPX trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.
QLS vs AMPFX Comparison
QLS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLS stands at 0. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLS is priced at $25.09, while AMPFX trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, QLS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLS is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLS.