Quality Industrial Corp.
Quality Industrial Corp. QIND Peers
See (QIND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QIND | $0.02 | +0.00% | 2.4M | 0.15 | $0.10 | N/A |
| SMAWF | $256.10 | -0.54% | 202.5B | 22.82 | $11.31 | +2.11% |
| SIEGY | $128.87 | +0.00% | 199.8B | 22.53 | $5.66 | +1.57% |
| SBGSF | $270.60 | +0.00% | 151.4B | 29.65 | $9.10 | +1.04% |
| SBGSY | $53.38 | +0.00% | 147.5B | 28.38 | $1.85 | +1.59% |
| RCIT | $2,144.21 | +53605150.00% | 133.4B | -214421.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ATLFF | $13.56 | -0.00% | 90.9B | 26.98 | $0.63 | +0.18% |
| SMEGF | $115.78 | +0.00% | 87.5B | 440.00 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $115.86 | +0.00% | 86.9B | 455.13 | $0.24 | N/A |
| MHVYF | $25.90 | +0.00% | 84.7B | 50.45 | $0.50 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
QIND vs SMAWF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 202.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMAWF trades at $256.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SIEGY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 199.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SIEGY trades at $128.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SBGSF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 151.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SBGSF trades at $270.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SBGSY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SBGSY trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs RCIT Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while RCIT trades at $2,144.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -214421.00. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ATLFF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ATLFF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SMEGF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMEGF trades at $115.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 440.00. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SMNEY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMNEY trades at $115.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 455.13. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs MHVYF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while MHVYF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 50.45. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ATLKY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ATLKY trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ATLCY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ATLCY trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ATLPF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ATLPF trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WRTBY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WRTBY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KNYJY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KNYJY trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SHLRF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SHLRF trades at $367.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SHLAF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SHLAF trades at $373.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KNYJF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KNYJF trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WEGZY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WEGZY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SDVKF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SDVKF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SDVKY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SDVKY trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FANUF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FANUF trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FANUY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FANUY trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SMCAY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMCAY trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NNDNF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NNDNF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SMECF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMECF trades at $353.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NJDCY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NJDCY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WEICF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WEICF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ALFVF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ALFVY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ALFVY trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs IHICY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while IHICY trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs VWSYF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while VWSYF trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs VWDRY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while VWDRY trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WEICY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SIELF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs GCTAF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KWHIY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KWHIY trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs GCTAY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KWHIF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KWHIF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs VACNY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while VACNY trades at $41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 47.28. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WRTBF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WRTBF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs GEAGF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while GEAGF trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs IHICF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while IHICF trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SMGZY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMGZY trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs VTTGF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs RTLLF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while RTLLF trades at $828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs TBABF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs DFKCY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while DFKCY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs MLSPF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while MLSPF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -143.90. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs EBCOY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while EBCOY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WEIGF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WEIGF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs WEGRY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while WEGRY trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs JPSWY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while JPSWY trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs DAIUF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while DAIUF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs DNGFF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs EBCOF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SMGKF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs YOKEY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while YOKEY trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs IMIAF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while IMIAF trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs RATIY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SULZF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SULZF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FCHRF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SPXSF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SPXSF trades at $83.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SPXSY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SPXSY trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs VLMTY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs XJNGF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while XJNGF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs YOKEF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs CYJBF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs HAIIF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs HSHIF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while HSHIF trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs HSHZY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while HSHZY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NRXXY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NRXXY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 128.75. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs BCHHF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs JGHAF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while JGHAF trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NRDXF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NRDXF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KRNNF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FLUIF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FLUIF trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs VOYJF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SFSLF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs YMATF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NGKIF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NGKIF trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs AALBF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while AALBF trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs ATSAF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FJTCY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FJTCY trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs MRRLF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs MICLF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs RTOXF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while RTOXF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KUKAF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FLIDY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs AMDWF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs FLIDF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs THKLY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while THKLY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 52.52. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs THKLF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs KRDXF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while KRDXF trades at $307.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SOHVF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs IRRHF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while IRRHF trades at $2,389.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to IRRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs SOHVY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while SOHVY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 501.00. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs JGHHY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NCTKY Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NCTKY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.
QIND vs NCTKF Comparison
QIND plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIND stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QIND is priced at $0.02, while NCTKF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIND currently has a P/E ratio of 0.15, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, QIND's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIND is more volatile compared to NCTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIND.