QuantGate Systems Inc.
QuantGate Systems Inc. QGSI Peers
See (QGSI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGSI | $0.03 | +329.54% | 3.3M | -1.17 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $296.98 | -2.00% | 350B | 53.58 | $5.60 | +0.88% |
| CNSWF | $3,625.13 | -1.20% | 77.7B | 104.92 | $34.95 | +0.11% |
| OBIIF | $36.97 | +0.00% | 55.9B | 125.74 | $1.01 | +0.18% |
| INVUP | $26.00 | +0.00% | 48.3B | -1733.33 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTY | $36.53 | +0.88% | 47.7B | 35.25 | $1.03 | +0.82% |
| DASTF | $35.81 | -1.22% | 46.2B | 35.55 | $0.99 | +0.81% |
| WIGBY | $72.00 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 121.25 | $0.60 | +0.18% |
| WTCHF | $71.10 | +1.82% | 23.6B | 116.56 | $0.61 | +0.15% |
| DIDIY | $4.95 | +1.02% | 22.4B | 60.00 | $0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QGSI vs SAPGF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 350B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SAPGF trades at $296.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs CNSWF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while CNSWF trades at $3,625.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs OBIIF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while OBIIF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 125.74. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs INVUP Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while INVUP trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1733.33. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs DASTY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while DASTY trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs DASTF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while DASTF trades at $35.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs WIGBY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while WIGBY trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 121.25. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs WTCHF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while WTCHF trades at $71.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 116.56. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs DIDIY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while DIDIY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs XROLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while XROLF trades at $113.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 130.99. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SGGEF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SGGEF trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SGPYY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SGPYY trades at $65.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NEMKY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NEMKY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 80.57. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs OCLCF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while OCLCF trades at $123.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NEMTF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 70.40. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NCSYF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NCSYF trades at $167.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs KGDEY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while KGDEY trades at $189.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -344.12. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ALMFF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs HOILF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TMNSF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TMSNY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TMSNY trades at $72.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs THNOF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs LIFX Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while LIFX trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 525.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SRBEF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SRBEF trades at $316.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs FNOXF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SMCYY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs KXSCF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while KXSCF trades at $145.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 434.14. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SICRF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ASOZF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ASOZF trades at $54.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ASOZY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs WEMXF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TMVWF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs UBMRF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs KHOTF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TMVWY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TMVWY trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs QTGPF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while QTGPF trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ESKEF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TMOAY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TMOAY trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SWONF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SWONF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -950.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs FREKF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while FREKF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -19.59. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs MAGTF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs IPEU Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs KNNNF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while KNNNF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs VOBIF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ZEUCF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs GBGPF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs LTTHF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ESIGF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs EGHSF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 944.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while EGHSF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs BTRCF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 824.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs BHPA Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while BHPA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SLVFF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TTMZF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 658M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NPACY Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 631.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NPACY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs XMMRF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TMOAF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NXLLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 529.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NXLLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 160.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs PSSWF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs RWWI Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 490.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while RWWI trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NSWEF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs CMDXF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while CMDXF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs CHNVF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs BRDLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs BLKLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 445.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while BLKLF trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -75.40. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NPACF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TCYSF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 440.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TCYSF trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 135.05. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs BVSFF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs IQGLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs RPGHF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs LCHTF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs RTME Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs PLDIF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while PLDIF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs JAPPF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs KWIK Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KWIK has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while KWIK trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas KWIK's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KWIK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to KWIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ELMFF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs ABXXF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while ABXXF trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs RLLMF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while RLLMF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 209.50. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs PXPHF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs PTRRF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while PTRRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs IVUFF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs CIGMF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs DOTDF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while DOTDF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs EXMXF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs LOQPF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs MCAP Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while MCAP trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs BAINF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while BAINF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs DAHLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SMTEF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SMTEF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs FXSRF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs FBSFF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 192.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs NEOJF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs WONDF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs IARGF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs EXSPF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while EXSPF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs CBSZF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs TCIIF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs SYZLF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while SYZLF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs DFORF Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.
QGSI vs GBUX Comparison
QGSI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QGSI stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QGSI is priced at $0.03, while GBUX trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QGSI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.17, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, QGSI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QGSI is more volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QGSI.