Quadient S.A.
Quadient S.A. (QDT.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QDT.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDT.PA | €10.88 | -0.73% | 363.4M | 5.96 | €1.81 | +6.49% |
| DSY.PA | €17.52 | +3.42% | 22.7B | 19.19 | €0.90 | +1.51% |
| ALTTU.PA | €5.45 | +0.00% | 4.5B | -545.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| VU.PA | €111.10 | +1.28% | 1.8B | -135.19 | -€0.81 | +0.55% |
| ALESK.PA | €277.40 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 100.14 | €2.77 | N/A |
| ESI.PA | €154.00 | -0.32% | 879.5M | -700.00 | -€0.22 | N/A |
| AXW.PA | €27.50 | +0.00% | 800.5M | 19.10 | €1.44 | N/A |
| LSS.PA | €16.46 | +2.36% | 634.9M | 24.56 | €0.68 | +2.40% |
| TOM2.AS | €4.39 | +3.24% | 536.3M | -86.16 | -€0.05 | N/A |
| SWP.PA | €31.40 | +3.80% | 292.4M | 14.26 | €2.17 | +6.46% |
Stock Comparison
QDT.PA vs DSY.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, DSY.PA has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while DSY.PA trades at €17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas DSY.PA's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DSY.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to DSY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check DSY.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALTTU.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALTTU.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALTTU.PA trades at €5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALTTU.PA's P/E ratio is -545.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALTTU.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALTTU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALTTU.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs VU.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, VU.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while VU.PA trades at €111.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas VU.PA's P/E ratio is -135.19. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VU.PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to VU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check VU.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALESK.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALESK.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALESK.PA trades at €277.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALESK.PA's P/E ratio is 100.14. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALESK.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to ALESK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALESK.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ESI.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ESI.PA has a market cap of 879.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ESI.PA trades at €154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ESI.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ESI.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ESI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ESI.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs AXW.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, AXW.PA has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while AXW.PA trades at €27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas AXW.PA's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AXW.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to AXW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check AXW.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs LSS.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, LSS.PA has a market cap of 634.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while LSS.PA trades at €16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas LSS.PA's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LSS.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to LSS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check LSS.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs TOM2.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, TOM2.AS has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while TOM2.AS trades at €4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas TOM2.AS's P/E ratio is -86.16. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TOM2.AS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to TOM2.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check TOM2.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs SWP.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, SWP.PA has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while SWP.PA trades at €31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas SWP.PA's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWP.PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to SWP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check SWP.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALBFR.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALBFR.PA has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALBFR.PA trades at €154.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALBFR.PA's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALBFR.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to ALBFR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALBFR.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALPRO.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALPRO.PA has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALPRO.PA trades at €28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALPRO.PA's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALPRO.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALPRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALPRO.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs LIN.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, LIN.PA has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while LIN.PA trades at €40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas LIN.PA's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LIN.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to LIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check LIN.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALSTW.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALSTW.PA has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALSTW.PA trades at €74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALSTW.PA's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALSTW.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALSTW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALSTW.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs CMCOM.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, CMCOM.AS has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while CMCOM.AS trades at €5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas CMCOM.AS's P/E ratio is -45.25. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMCOM.AS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to CMCOM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check CMCOM.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALVIV.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALVIV.PA has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALVIV.PA trades at €37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALVIV.PA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALVIV.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALVIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALVIV.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs MTRK.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MTRK.AS has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MTRK.AS trades at €3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MTRK.AS's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MTRK.AS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to MTRK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MTRK.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs UPG.BR Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, UPG.BR has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while UPG.BR trades at €3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas UPG.BR's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UPG.BR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to UPG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check UPG.BR's competition here
QDT.PA vs HYSG.BR Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, HYSG.BR has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while HYSG.BR trades at €3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas HYSG.BR's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HYSG.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to HYSG.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check HYSG.BR's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALTBG.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALTBG.PA has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALTBG.PA trades at €0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALTBG.PA's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALTBG.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to ALTBG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALTBG.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs COH.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, COH.PA has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while COH.PA trades at €11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas COH.PA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COH.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to COH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check COH.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs TIE.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, TIE.AS has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while TIE.AS trades at €31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas TIE.AS's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TIE.AS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to TIE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check TIE.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs CLA.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, CLA.PA has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while CLA.PA trades at €1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas CLA.PA's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLA.PA's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to CLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check CLA.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALPHI.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALPHI.PA has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALPHI.PA trades at €2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALPHI.PA's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALPHI.PA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALPHI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALPHI.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs DLE.IR Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, DLE.IR has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while DLE.IR trades at €0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas DLE.IR's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DLE.IR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to DLE.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check DLE.IR's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALTTI.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALTTI.PA has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALTTI.PA trades at €2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALTTI.PA's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALTTI.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALTTI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALTTI.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALWED.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALWED.PA has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALWED.PA trades at €30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALWED.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALWED.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALWED.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALWED.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALPRG.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALPRG.PA has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALPRG.PA trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALPRG.PA's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALPRG.PA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALPRG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALPRG.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs EXR.IR Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, EXR.IR has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while EXR.IR trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas EXR.IR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXR.IR's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to EXR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check EXR.IR's competition here
QDT.PA vs MLMCA.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MLMCA.PA has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MLMCA.PA trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MLMCA.PA's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLMCA.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to MLMCA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MLMCA.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALVGO.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALVGO.PA has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALVGO.PA trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALVGO.PA's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALVGO.PA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALVGO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALVGO.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALNRG.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALNRG.PA has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALNRG.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALNRG.PA's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALNRG.PA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to ALNRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALNRG.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs NEDSE.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, NEDSE.AS has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while NEDSE.AS trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas NEDSE.AS's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEDSE.AS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to NEDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check NEDSE.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs PROAC.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, PROAC.PA has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while PROAC.PA trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas PROAC.PA's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PROAC.PA's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to PROAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check PROAC.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs GOJXN.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, GOJXN.AS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while GOJXN.AS trades at €1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas GOJXN.AS's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GOJXN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to GOJXN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check GOJXN.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs MLPAC.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MLPAC.PA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MLPAC.PA trades at €9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MLPAC.PA's P/E ratio is -29.19. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLPAC.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to MLPAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MLPAC.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs MLIDS.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MLIDS.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MLIDS.PA trades at €0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MLIDS.PA's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLIDS.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to MLIDS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MLIDS.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALSIM.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALSIM.PA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALSIM.PA trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALSIM.PA's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALSIM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALSIM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALSIM.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALENT.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALENT.PA has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALENT.PA trades at €1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALENT.PA's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALENT.PA's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to ALENT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALENT.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALIMR.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALIMR.PA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALIMR.PA trades at €2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALIMR.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALIMR.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALIMR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALIMR.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs EOS.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, EOS.PA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while EOS.PA trades at €0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas EOS.PA's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EOS.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to EOS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check EOS.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs MLDAM.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MLDAM.PA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MLDAM.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MLDAM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLDAM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to MLDAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MLDAM.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ALNMR.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ALNMR.PA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ALNMR.PA trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ALNMR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALNMR.PA's ROE of +51.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ALNMR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ALNMR.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs MLTV.BR Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MLTV.BR has a market cap of 434.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MLTV.BR trades at €0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MLTV.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLTV.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to MLTV.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MLTV.BR's competition here
QDT.PA vs MLMGL.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, MLMGL.PA has a market cap of 290.6K. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while MLMGL.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas MLMGL.PA's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLMGL.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to MLMGL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check MLMGL.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs 6VR.IR Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, 6VR.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while 6VR.IR trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas 6VR.IR's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 6VR.IR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to 6VR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check 6VR.IR's competition here
QDT.PA vs PROL.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, PROL.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while PROL.PA trades at €0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas PROL.PA's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PROL.PA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to PROL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check PROL.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs CAS.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, CAS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while CAS.PA trades at €7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas CAS.PA's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAS.PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to CAS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check CAS.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs GENX.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, GENX.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while GENX.PA trades at €9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas GENX.PA's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GENX.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to GENX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check GENX.PA's competition here
QDT.PA vs ICT.AS Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, ICT.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while ICT.AS trades at €14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas ICT.AS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ICT.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is more volatile compared to ICT.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check ICT.AS's competition here
QDT.PA vs IGE.PA Comparison April 2026
QDT.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QDT.PA stands at 363.4M. In comparison, IGE.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QDT.PA is priced at €10.88, while IGE.PA trades at €210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QDT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.96, whereas IGE.PA's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, QDT.PA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IGE.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QDT.PA is less volatile compared to IGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QDT.PA.Check IGE.PA's competition here