Quebecor Inc.
Quebecor Inc. QBR-A.TO Peers
See (QBR-A.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBR-A.TO | CA$40.89 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 12.39 | CA$3.30 | +3.26% |
| VZ.NE | CA$18.69 | +2.58% | 248.8B | 10.16 | CA$1.84 | +6.38% |
| T.TO | CA$21.87 | +0.88% | 33.4B | 27.68 | CA$0.79 | +8.10% |
| BCE.TO | CA$30.20 | +1.04% | 27.8B | 71.90 | CA$0.42 | +11.39% |
| RCI-B.TO | CA$40.39 | +1.30% | 21.9B | 12.47 | CA$3.24 | +5.42% |
| RCI-A.TO | CA$43.40 | +0.70% | 21.8B | 13.40 | CA$3.24 | +5.03% |
| SJR-B.TO | CA$40.48 | +0.02% | 20.2B | 27.54 | CA$1.47 | N/A |
| BCE-PA.TO | CA$18.78 | +0.91% | 17.3B | 5.80 | CA$3.24 | +11.39% |
| BCE-PY.TO | CA$30.20 | +67.87% | 16.6B | 5.57 | CA$3.24 | +11.39% |
| QBR-B.TO | CA$41.45 | +1.84% | 9.7B | 12.56 | CA$3.30 | +3.26% |
Stock Comparison
QBR-A.TO vs VZ.NE Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VZ.NE has a market cap of 248.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while VZ.NE trades at CA$18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas VZ.NE's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VZ.NE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to VZ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs T.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, T.TO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while T.TO trades at CA$21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas T.TO's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to T.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to T.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs BCE.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BCE.TO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while BCE.TO trades at CA$30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas BCE.TO's P/E ratio is 71.90. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCE.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to BCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs RCI-B.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RCI-B.TO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while RCI-B.TO trades at CA$40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas RCI-B.TO's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RCI-B.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to RCI-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs RCI-A.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RCI-A.TO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while RCI-A.TO trades at CA$43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas RCI-A.TO's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RCI-A.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to RCI-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs SJR-B.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SJR-B.TO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while SJR-B.TO trades at CA$40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas SJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SJR-B.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to SJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs BCE-PA.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BCE-PA.TO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while BCE-PA.TO trades at CA$18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas BCE-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCE-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to BCE-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs BCE-PY.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BCE-PY.TO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while BCE-PY.TO trades at CA$30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas BCE-PY.TO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCE-PY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to BCE-PY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs QBR-B.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, QBR-B.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while QBR-B.TO trades at CA$41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas QBR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to QBR-B.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to QBR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs CCA.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CCA.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while CCA.TO trades at CA$71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas CCA.TO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CCA.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to CCA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs CGO.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CGO.TO has a market cap of 648.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while CGO.TO trades at CA$67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas CGO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CGO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to CGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs TGO.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TGO.TO has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while TGO.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas TGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TGO.TO's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to TGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs TO.CN Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TO.CN has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while TO.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas TO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to TO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs RVR.CN Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RVR.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while RVR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas RVR.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RVR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to RVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs ADMT.CN Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ADMT.CN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while ADMT.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas ADMT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ADMT.CN's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to ADMT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.
QBR-A.TO vs TRL.TO Comparison
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TRL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$40.89, while TRL.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas TRL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TRL.TO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to TRL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.