Quebecor Inc.
Quebecor Inc. (QBR-A.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBR-A.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBR-A.TO | CA$58.76 | +0.44% | 13.5B | 16.55 | CA$3.55 | +2.48% |
| VZ.NE | CA$20.96 | -0.05% | 276.4B | 10.17 | CA$2.06 | +5.53% |
| BCE.TO | CA$34.06 | -3.40% | 31.8B | 5.02 | CA$6.79 | +5.15% |
| T.TO | CA$17.92 | -0.67% | 28B | 24.89 | CA$0.72 | +9.39% |
| RCI-A.TO | CA$50.25 | -5.05% | 27.1B | 3.94 | CA$12.74 | +3.98% |
| RCI-B.TO | CA$48.76 | -7.95% | 26.3B | 3.83 | CA$12.74 | +4.07% |
| SJR-B.TO | CA$40.48 | +0.02% | 20.2B | 27.54 | CA$1.47 | +2.93% |
| BCE-PA.TO | CA$20.90 | +0.48% | 19.4B | 6.45 | CA$3.24 | +5.15% |
| BCE-PY.TO | CA$20.15 | +0.25% | 18.7B | 6.22 | CA$3.24 | +5.15% |
| QBR-B.TO | CA$58.83 | +1.01% | 13.5B | 16.57 | CA$3.55 | +2.48% |
Stock Comparison
QBR-A.TO vs VZ.NE Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VZ.NE has a market cap of 276.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while VZ.NE trades at CA$20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas VZ.NE's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VZ.NE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to VZ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check VZ.NE's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs BCE.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BCE.TO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while BCE.TO trades at CA$34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas BCE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCE.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to BCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check BCE.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs T.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, T.TO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while T.TO trades at CA$17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas T.TO's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to T.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to T.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check T.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs RCI-A.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RCI-A.TO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while RCI-A.TO trades at CA$50.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas RCI-A.TO's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RCI-A.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to RCI-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check RCI-A.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs RCI-B.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RCI-B.TO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while RCI-B.TO trades at CA$48.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas RCI-B.TO's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RCI-B.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to RCI-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check RCI-B.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs SJR-B.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SJR-B.TO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while SJR-B.TO trades at CA$40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas SJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SJR-B.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to SJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check SJR-B.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs BCE-PA.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BCE-PA.TO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while BCE-PA.TO trades at CA$20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas BCE-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCE-PA.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to BCE-PA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check BCE-PA.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs BCE-PY.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BCE-PY.TO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while BCE-PY.TO trades at CA$20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas BCE-PY.TO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCE-PY.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to BCE-PY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check BCE-PY.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs QBR-B.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, QBR-B.TO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while QBR-B.TO trades at CA$58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas QBR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to QBR-B.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to QBR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check QBR-B.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs CCA.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CCA.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while CCA.TO trades at CA$69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas CCA.TO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CCA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to CCA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check CCA.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs CGO.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CGO.TO has a market cap of 649.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while CGO.TO trades at CA$68.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas CGO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CGO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to CGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check CGO.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs TGO.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TGO.TO has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while TGO.TO trades at CA$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas TGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TGO.TO's ROE of -87.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to TGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check TGO.TO's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs TO.CN Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TO.CN has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while TO.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas TO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TO.CN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to TO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check TO.CN's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs RVR.CN Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RVR.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while RVR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas RVR.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RVR.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to RVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check RVR.CN's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs ADMT.CN Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ADMT.CN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while ADMT.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas ADMT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ADMT.CN's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is more volatile compared to ADMT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check ADMT.CN's competition here
QBR-A.TO vs TRL.TO Comparison April 2026
QBR-A.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBR-A.TO stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TRL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBR-A.TO is priced at CA$58.76, while TRL.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBR-A.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.55, whereas TRL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBR-A.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TRL.TO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBR-A.TO is less volatile compared to TRL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBR-A.TO.Check TRL.TO's competition here