Qube Holdings Limited
Qube Holdings Limited (QBBHY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBBHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBBHY | $11.50 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 26.74 | $0.43 | +2.60% |
| DPSGY | $49.33 | +2.46% | 59.1B | 10.15 | $4.86 | +4.68% |
| DSDVY | $112.33 | -4.72% | 52.9B | 30.34 | $3.70 | +0.45% |
| DSDVF | $223.60 | -6.58% | 52.7B | 29.54 | $7.57 | +0.44% |
| DHLGY | $44.97 | -1.06% | 52.6B | 13.55 | $3.32 | +4.65% |
| DPSTF | $44.62 | -1.17% | 51.5B | 13.28 | $3.36 | +4.65% |
| KHNGF | $207.18 | -0.70% | 24.6B | 16.97 | $12.21 | +4.73% |
| KHNGY | $40.76 | -1.02% | 24.2B | 16.72 | $2.44 | +5.71% |
| JDLGF | $1.23 | -41.43% | 8.2B | 9.46 | $0.13 | N/A |
| SGHDY | $11.48 | +2.25% | 7.2B | 18.21 | $0.63 | +3.14% |
Stock Comparison
QBBHY vs DPSGY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DPSGY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DPSGY trades at $49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DPSGY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPSGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to DPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check DPSGY's competition here
QBBHY vs DSDVY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DSDVY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DSDVY trades at $112.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DSDVY's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSDVY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to DSDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check DSDVY's competition here
QBBHY vs DSDVF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DSDVF has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DSDVF trades at $223.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DSDVF's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSDVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to DSDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check DSDVF's competition here
QBBHY vs DHLGY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DHLGY has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DHLGY trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DHLGY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHLGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to DHLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check DHLGY's competition here
QBBHY vs DPSTF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DPSTF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DPSTF trades at $44.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPSTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to DPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check DPSTF's competition here
QBBHY vs KHNGF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KHNGF has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KHNGF trades at $207.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas KHNGF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHNGF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to KHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check KHNGF's competition here
QBBHY vs KHNGY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KHNGY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KHNGY trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas KHNGY's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHNGY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to KHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check KHNGY's competition here
QBBHY vs JDLGF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JDLGF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while JDLGF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas JDLGF's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JDLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to JDLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check JDLGF's competition here
QBBHY vs SGHDY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGHDY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SGHDY trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SGHDY's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGHDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to SGHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SGHDY's competition here
QBBHY vs SGHHF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGHHF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SGHHF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SGHHF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGHHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to SGHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SGHHF's competition here
QBBHY vs SNOTF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNOTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SNOTF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SNOTF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNOTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to SNOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SNOTF's competition here
QBBHY vs PTNYF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PTNYF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PTNYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PTNYF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTNYF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to PTNYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check PTNYF's competition here
QBBHY vs QUBHF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QUBHF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while QUBHF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas QUBHF's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUBHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to QUBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check QUBHF's competition here
QBBHY vs ROYMF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROYMF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ROYMF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas ROYMF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROYMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to ROYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check ROYMF's competition here
QBBHY vs CDNIF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDNIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CDNIF trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas CDNIF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDNIF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to CDNIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check CDNIF's competition here
QBBHY vs ROYMY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROYMY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ROYMY trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas ROYMY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROYMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to ROYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check ROYMY's competition here
QBBHY vs MFGHF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MFGHF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while MFGHF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas MFGHF's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to MFGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check MFGHF's competition here
QBBHY vs OSTIY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OSTIY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while OSTIY trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas OSTIY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSTIY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to OSTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check OSTIY's competition here
QBBHY vs OERCF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OERCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while OERCF trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas OERCF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OERCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to OERCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check OERCF's competition here
QBBHY vs KMGIF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KMGIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KMGIF trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas KMGIF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to KMGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check KMGIF's competition here
QBBHY vs ANDHF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANDHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ANDHF trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas ANDHF's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to ANDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check ANDHF's competition here
QBBHY vs PGUCY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PGUCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PGUCY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PGUCY's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGUCY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to PGUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check PGUCY's competition here
QBBHY vs KRRYF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRRYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KRRYF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas KRRYF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRRYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to KRRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check KRRYF's competition here
QBBHY vs CTTOF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTTOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CTTOF trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas CTTOF's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTTOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to CTTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check CTTOF's competition here
QBBHY vs SPSTF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPSTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SPSTF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SPSTF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to SPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SPSTF's competition here
QBBHY vs SPSTY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPSTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SPSTY trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SPSTY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPSTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to SPSTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SPSTY's competition here
QBBHY vs CGJTF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CGJTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CGJTF trades at $71.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas CGJTF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGJTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to CGJTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check CGJTF's competition here
QBBHY vs BPOSF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPOSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while BPOSF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas BPOSF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPOSF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to BPOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check BPOSF's competition here
QBBHY vs PGUUF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PGUUF has a market cap of 897.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PGUUF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PGUUF's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGUUF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to PGUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check PGUUF's competition here
QBBHY vs RYSKF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RYSKF has a market cap of 880M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while RYSKF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas RYSKF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYSKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to RYSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check RYSKF's competition here
QBBHY vs TNTFF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TNTFF has a market cap of 569.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while TNTFF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas TNTFF's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNTFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to TNTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check TNTFF's competition here
QBBHY vs PSTNY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PSTNY has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PSTNY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PSTNY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSTNY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to PSTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check PSTNY's competition here
QBBHY vs BPOSY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPOSY has a market cap of 501M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while BPOSY trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas BPOSY's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPOSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to BPOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check BPOSY's competition here
QBBHY vs GRDLY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRDLY has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while GRDLY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas GRDLY's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRDLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to GRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check GRDLY's competition here
QBBHY vs CSCMY Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSCMY has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CSCMY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas CSCMY's P/E ratio is 43.90. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSCMY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to CSCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check CSCMY's competition here
QBBHY vs YTOEF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YTOEF has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while YTOEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas YTOEF's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YTOEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to YTOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check YTOEF's competition here
QBBHY vs ESLGF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESLGF has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ESLGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas ESLGF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESLGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to ESLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check ESLGF's competition here
QBBHY vs TTNMF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TTNMF has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while TTNMF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas TTNMF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTNMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to TTNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check TTNMF's competition here
QBBHY vs JANL Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JANL has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while JANL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas JANL's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to JANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check JANL's competition here
QBBHY vs DVNHF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DVNHF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DVNHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas DVNHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVNHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to DVNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check DVNHF's competition here
QBBHY vs ASNCF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASNCF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ASNCF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas ASNCF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to ASNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check ASNCF's competition here
QBBHY vs PDPTF Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PDPTF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PDPTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas PDPTF's P/E ratio is -24.30. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDPTF's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to PDPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check PDPTF's competition here
QBBHY vs UNQL Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UNQL has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while UNQL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas UNQL's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNQL's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to UNQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check UNQL's competition here
QBBHY vs NVGT Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVGT has a market cap of 49.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while NVGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas NVGT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVGT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to NVGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check NVGT's competition here
QBBHY vs USRC Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, USRC has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while USRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas USRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USRC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to USRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check USRC's competition here
QBBHY vs SCBZ Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SCBZ has a market cap of 16.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SCBZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SCBZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCBZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is more volatile compared to SCBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SCBZ's competition here
QBBHY vs SGRZ Comparison July 2025
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGRZ has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SGRZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.74, whereas SGRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGRZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to SGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.Check SGRZ's competition here