Qube Holdings Limited
Qube Holdings Limited QBBHY Peers
See (QBBHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBBHY | $11.50 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 27.28 | $0.43 | +2.55% |
| DPSGY | $49.33 | +2.46% | 59.1B | 10.15 | $4.86 | +4.72% |
| DSDVY | $120.32 | -0.22% | 56.6B | 32.84 | $3.66 | +0.42% |
| DSDVF | $239.90 | +0.59% | 56.5B | 32.77 | $7.32 | +0.06% |
| DHLGY | $46.45 | -0.90% | 53.4B | 14.12 | $3.28 | +4.54% |
| DPSTF | $45.38 | +0.07% | 52.3B | 13.79 | $3.29 | +4.62% |
| KHNGY | $43.32 | -0.62% | 25.7B | 17.25 | $2.51 | +5.43% |
| KHNGF | $216.06 | -2.57% | 25.6B | 17.19 | $12.57 | +4.53% |
| JDLGF | $1.40 | +0.00% | 14B | 16.15 | $0.13 | N/A |
| SGHDY | $11.20 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 17.11 | $0.64 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
QBBHY vs DPSGY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DPSGY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DPSGY trades at $49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas DPSGY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPSGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to DPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs DSDVY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DSDVY has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DSDVY trades at $120.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas DSDVY's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSDVY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to DSDVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs DSDVF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DSDVF has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DSDVF trades at $239.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas DSDVF's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSDVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to DSDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs DHLGY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DHLGY has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DHLGY trades at $46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas DHLGY's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHLGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to DHLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs DPSTF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DPSTF has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DPSTF trades at $45.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas DPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPSTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and DPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs KHNGY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KHNGY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KHNGY trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas KHNGY's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHNGY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to KHNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs KHNGF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KHNGF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KHNGF trades at $216.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas KHNGF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHNGF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and KHNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs JDLGF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JDLGF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while JDLGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas JDLGF's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JDLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and JDLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SGHDY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGHDY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SGHDY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SGHDY's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGHDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SGHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SGHHF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGHHF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SGHHF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SGHHF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SGHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs MFGHF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MFGHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while MFGHF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas MFGHF's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFGHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and MFGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs PTNYF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PTNYF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PTNYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas PTNYF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTNYF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and PTNYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs ROYMF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROYMF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ROYMF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas ROYMF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROYMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and ROYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs CDNIF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDNIF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CDNIF trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas CDNIF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDNIF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and CDNIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SNOTF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNOTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SNOTF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SNOTF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNOTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SNOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs QUBHF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QUBHF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while QUBHF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas QUBHF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUBHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and QUBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs ROYMY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROYMY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ROYMY trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas ROYMY's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROYMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and ROYMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs OERCF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OERCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while OERCF trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas OERCF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OERCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and OERCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs OSTIY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OSTIY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while OSTIY trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas OSTIY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSTIY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to OSTIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs KMGIF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KMGIF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KMGIF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas KMGIF's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMGIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to KMGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs ANDHF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANDHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ANDHF trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas ANDHF's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and ANDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs KRRYF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRRYF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while KRRYF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas KRRYF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRRYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to KRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs PGUCY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PGUCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PGUCY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas PGUCY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGUCY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and PGUCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs CTTOF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTTOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CTTOF trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas CTTOF's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTTOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and CTTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs CGJTF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CGJTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CGJTF trades at $69.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas CGJTF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGJTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to CGJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs PGUUF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PGUUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PGUUF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas PGUUF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGUUF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and PGUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SPSTY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPSTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SPSTY trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SPSTY's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPSTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SPSTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs BPOSF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPOSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while BPOSF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas BPOSF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPOSF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and BPOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SPSTF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPSTF has a market cap of 855M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SPSTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SPSTF's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs RYSKF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RYSKF has a market cap of 800M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while RYSKF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas RYSKF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYSKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and RYSKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs PSTNY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PSTNY has a market cap of 587.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PSTNY trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas PSTNY's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSTNY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and PSTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs BPOSY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPOSY has a market cap of 544M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while BPOSY trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas BPOSY's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPOSY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and BPOSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs GRDLY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRDLY has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while GRDLY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas GRDLY's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRDLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and GRDLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs TNTFF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TNTFF has a market cap of 467.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while TNTFF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas TNTFF's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNTFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and TNTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs CSCMY Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSCMY has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while CSCMY trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas CSCMY's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSCMY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and CSCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs YTOEF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YTOEF has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while YTOEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas YTOEF's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YTOEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and YTOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs ESLGF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESLGF has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ESLGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas ESLGF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESLGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and ESLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs TTNMF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TTNMF has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while TTNMF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas TTNMF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTNMF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and TTNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs JANL Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JANL has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while JANL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas JANL's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and JANL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs ASNCF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASNCF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while ASNCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas ASNCF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and ASNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs DVNHF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DVNHF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while DVNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas DVNHF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVNHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and DVNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs PDPTF Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PDPTF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while PDPTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas PDPTF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDPTF's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and PDPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs UNQL Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UNQL has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while UNQL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas UNQL's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNQL's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY is less volatile compared to UNQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBBHY.
QBBHY vs NVGT Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVGT has a market cap of 49.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while NVGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas NVGT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVGT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and NVGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs USRC Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, USRC has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while USRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas USRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USRC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and USRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SCBZ Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SCBZ has a market cap of 16.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SCBZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SCBZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCBZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SCBZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QBBHY vs SGRZ Comparison
QBBHY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBBHY stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGRZ has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBBHY is priced at $11.50, while SGRZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBBHY currently has a P/E ratio of 27.28, whereas SGRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBBHY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGRZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QBBHY and SGRZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).