Hydro Power Technologies Inc.
Hydro Power Technologies Inc. (PYBX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PYBX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYBX | $0.01 | +17.65% | 1.4M | N/A | -$32.24 | N/A |
| SMAWF | $274.58 | -1.18% | 218.1B | 24.15 | $11.51 | +1.96% |
| SIEGY | $138.64 | +2.29% | 217.4B | 24.18 | $5.74 | +2.05% |
| SBGSY | $50.51 | +1.41% | 142.4B | 27.05 | $1.87 | +1.65% |
| SBGSF | $251.55 | -2.33% | 141.7B | 26.90 | $9.35 | +1.13% |
| RCIT | $2,174.98 | +0.00% | 135.3B | -217498.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $109.39 | +1.63% | 94.4B | 86.63 | $1.26 | N/A |
| MHVYF | $25.75 | +0.79% | 86.5B | 52.55 | $0.49 | +0.61% |
| SMEGF | $107.78 | +1.53% | 85.7B | 85.54 | $1.26 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $5.79 | +2.81% | 85.1B | 26.31 | $0.22 | +1.41% |
Stock Comparison
PYBX vs SMAWF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 218.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMAWF trades at $274.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SMAWF's competition here
PYBX vs SIEGY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 217.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SIEGY trades at $138.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SIEGY's competition here
PYBX vs SBGSY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SBGSY trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SBGSY's competition here
PYBX vs SBGSF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SBGSF trades at $251.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SBGSF's competition here
PYBX vs RCIT Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while RCIT trades at $2,174.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -217498.00. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check RCIT's competition here
PYBX vs SMNEY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMNEY trades at $109.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 86.63. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SMNEY's competition here
PYBX vs MHVYF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while MHVYF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check MHVYF's competition here
PYBX vs SMEGF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMEGF trades at $107.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 85.54. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SMEGF's competition here
PYBX vs WRTBY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WRTBY trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check WRTBY's competition here
PYBX vs ATLKY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ATLKY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check ATLKY's competition here
PYBX vs ATLPF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ATLPF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and ATLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATLPF's competition here
PYBX vs ATLFF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ATLFF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check ATLFF's competition here
PYBX vs ATLCY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ATLCY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check ATLCY's competition here
PYBX vs KNYJY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KNYJY trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check KNYJY's competition here
PYBX vs SHLAF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SHLAF trades at $376.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SHLAF's competition here
PYBX vs SHLRF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SHLRF trades at $354.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and SHLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLRF's competition here
PYBX vs SDVKY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SDVKY trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SDVKY's competition here
PYBX vs SDVKF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SDVKF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SDVKF's competition here
PYBX vs KNYJF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KNYJF trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check KNYJF's competition here
PYBX vs WEGZY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WEGZY trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check WEGZY's competition here
PYBX vs FANUY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FANUY trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check FANUY's competition here
PYBX vs FANUF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FANUF trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check FANUF's competition here
PYBX vs NJDCY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NJDCY trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check NJDCY's competition here
PYBX vs NNDNF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NNDNF trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and NNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNDNF's competition here
PYBX vs VWDRY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while VWDRY trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check VWDRY's competition here
PYBX vs VWSYF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while VWSYF trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check VWSYF's competition here
PYBX vs SMCAY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMCAY trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SMCAY's competition here
PYBX vs ALFVY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ALFVY trades at $46.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check ALFVY's competition here
PYBX vs SMECF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMECF trades at $313.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SMECF's competition here
PYBX vs WEICF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WEICF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check WEICF's competition here
PYBX vs IHICY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while IHICY trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check IHICY's competition here
PYBX vs WRTBF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WRTBF trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check WRTBF's competition here
PYBX vs IHICF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while IHICF trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and IHICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHICF's competition here
PYBX vs ALFVF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check ALFVF's competition here
PYBX vs WEICY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEICY's competition here
PYBX vs SIELF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and SIELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIELF's competition here
PYBX vs GCTAF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCTAF's competition here
PYBX vs GCTAY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check GCTAY's competition here
PYBX vs GEAGF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while GEAGF trades at $75.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check GEAGF's competition here
PYBX vs KWHIF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KWHIF trades at $70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check KWHIF's competition here
PYBX vs DFKCY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while DFKCY trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check DFKCY's competition here
PYBX vs SMGZY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMGZY trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SMGZY's competition here
PYBX vs KWHIY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KWHIY trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check KWHIY's competition here
PYBX vs VTTGF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while VTTGF trades at $355.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check VTTGF's competition here
PYBX vs RATIY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check RATIY's competition here
PYBX vs DAIUF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while DAIUF trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check DAIUF's competition here
PYBX vs SMGKF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SMGKF trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and SMGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMGKF's competition here
PYBX vs VACNY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while VACNY trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check VACNY's competition here
PYBX vs MLSPF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while MLSPF trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check MLSPF's competition here
PYBX vs EBCOY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while EBCOY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check EBCOY's competition here
PYBX vs JPSWY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while JPSWY trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check JPSWY's competition here
PYBX vs WEGRY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WEGRY trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check WEGRY's competition here
PYBX vs RTLLF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while RTLLF trades at $750.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and RTLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTLLF's competition here
PYBX vs TBABF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check TBABF's competition here
PYBX vs WEIGF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while WEIGF trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check WEIGF's competition here
PYBX vs SPXSY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SPXSY trades at $49.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SPXSY's competition here
PYBX vs IMIAF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while IMIAF trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check IMIAF's competition here
PYBX vs SPXSF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SPXSF trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SPXSF's competition here
PYBX vs YOKEY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while YOKEY trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check YOKEY's competition here
PYBX vs VLMTY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while VLMTY trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check VLMTY's competition here
PYBX vs VOYJF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while VOYJF trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOYJF's competition here
PYBX vs FCHRF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FCHRF trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +6.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check FCHRF's competition here
PYBX vs SULZF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SULZF trades at $188.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SULZF's competition here
PYBX vs NRDXF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NRDXF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and NRDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRDXF's competition here
PYBX vs NRXXY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NRXXY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and NRXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXXY's competition here
PYBX vs EBCOF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check EBCOF's competition here
PYBX vs HSHZY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while HSHZY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and HSHZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSHZY's competition here
PYBX vs HAIIF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIIF's competition here
PYBX vs FLUIF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FLUIF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check FLUIF's competition here
PYBX vs BCHHF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check BCHHF's competition here
PYBX vs YOKEF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check YOKEF's competition here
PYBX vs XJNGF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while XJNGF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check XJNGF's competition here
PYBX vs HSHIF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check HSHIF's competition here
PYBX vs YMATF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check YMATF's competition here
PYBX vs NGKIF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NGKIF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and NGKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGKIF's competition here
PYBX vs SFSLF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFSLF's competition here
PYBX vs DNGFF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check DNGFF's competition here
PYBX vs KRNNF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and KRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNNF's competition here
PYBX vs ATSAF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATSAF's competition here
PYBX vs AALBF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while AALBF trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and AALBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AALBF's competition here
PYBX vs JGHAF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while JGHAF trades at $39.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and JGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHAF's competition here
PYBX vs RTOXF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while RTOXF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and RTOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOXF's competition here
PYBX vs FLIDF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FLIDF trades at $65.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and FLIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLIDF's competition here
PYBX vs MRRLF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check MRRLF's competition here
PYBX vs MICLF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check MICLF's competition here
PYBX vs FLIDY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check FLIDY's competition here
PYBX vs CYJBF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check CYJBF's competition here
PYBX vs KRDXF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KRDXF trades at $421.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check KRDXF's competition here
PYBX vs THKLY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while THKLY trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 67.35. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check THKLY's competition here
PYBX vs KUKAF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUKAF's competition here
PYBX vs AMDWF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check AMDWF's competition here
PYBX vs NCTKY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NCTKY trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and NCTKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCTKY's competition here
PYBX vs FJTCY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while FJTCY trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and FJTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJTCY's competition here
PYBX vs SOHVF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and SOHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHVF's competition here
PYBX vs NCTKF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while NCTKF trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and NCTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCTKF's competition here
PYBX vs SOHVY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while SOHVY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is -139.87. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check SOHVY's competition here
PYBX vs THKLF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PYBX.Check THKLF's competition here
PYBX vs JGHHY Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and JGHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHHY's competition here
PYBX vs MIURF Comparison August 2025
PYBX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PYBX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PYBX is priced at $0.01, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PYBX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PYBX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PYBX and MIURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIURF's competition here