Prestige Wealth Inc.
Prestige Wealth Inc. (PWM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PWM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWM | $1.17 | +12.50% | 37M | -1.56 | -$0.75 | N/A |
| VITSX | $165.65 | +0.38% | 2.1T | 26.79 | $6.15 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $165.62 | +0.38% | 2.1T | 26.79 | $6.15 | +1.10% |
| PMFLX | $10.24 | -0.10% | 2T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OAKI | $26.67 | -0.01% | 1.6T | N/A | N/A | +0.04% |
| VOO | $629.53 | +0.00% | 1.5T | 27.79 | $22.81 | +1.12% |
| VFFSX | $338.71 | +0.43% | 1.5T | 27.60 | $12.19 | N/A |
| VFINX | $638.80 | +0.43% | 1.5T | 27.60 | $22.99 | +1.19% |
| BCTK | $24.60 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 43.31 | $0.57 | N/A |
| IVV | $687.68 | +0.00% | 756.9B | 27.76 | $24.94 | +1.16% |
Stock Comparison
PWM vs VITSX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VITSX trades at $165.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VITSX's competition here
PWM vs VTSAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTSAX trades at $165.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTSAX's competition here
PWM vs PMFLX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, PMFLX has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while PMFLX trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas PMFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PMFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to PMFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check PMFLX's competition here
PWM vs OAKI Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, OAKI has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while OAKI trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas OAKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OAKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to OAKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check OAKI's competition here
PWM vs VOO Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VOO trades at $629.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VOO's competition here
PWM vs VFFSX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VFFSX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VFFSX trades at $338.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VFFSX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VFFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VFFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VFFSX's competition here
PWM vs VFINX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VFINX trades at $638.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VFINX's competition here
PWM vs BCTK Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, BCTK has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while BCTK trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BCTK's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BCTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to BCTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check BCTK's competition here
PWM vs IVV Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 756.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while IVV trades at $687.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check IVV's competition here
PWM vs FXAIX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 755.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FXAIX trades at $240.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FXAIX's competition here
PWM vs SPY Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 704.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while SPY trades at $684.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check SPY's competition here
PWM vs VXUS Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 613.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VXUS trades at $82.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VXUS's competition here
PWM vs VTIAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTIAX has a market cap of 607.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTIAX trades at $44.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTIAX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTIAX's competition here
PWM vs VTSNX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 607.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTSNX trades at $179.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTSNX's competition here
PWM vs VTPSX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTPSX has a market cap of 607.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTPSX trades at $179.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTPSX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTPSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTPSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTPSX's competition here
PWM vs VTI Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 582.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTI trades at $338.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTI's competition here
PWM vs BMOP Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, BMOP has a market cap of 441.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while BMOP trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BMOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BMOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to BMOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check BMOP's competition here
PWM vs QQQ Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 415.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while QQQ trades at $603.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check QQQ's competition here
PWM vs VUG Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 355.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VUG trades at $461.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VUG's competition here
PWM vs VIGAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VIGAX has a market cap of 351.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VIGAX trades at $239.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VIGAX's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIGAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VIGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VIGAX's competition here
PWM vs VIIIX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 338.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VIIIX trades at $558.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VIIIX's competition here
PWM vs VINIX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 337.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VINIX trades at $558.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VINIX's competition here
PWM vs VEA Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 291.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VEA trades at $68.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VEA's competition here
PWM vs LACG Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, LACG has a market cap of 290.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while LACG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas LACG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LACG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to LACG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check LACG's competition here
PWM vs VTMNX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 288.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTMNX trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTMNX's competition here
PWM vs VDIPX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 288B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VDIPX trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VDIPX's competition here
PWM vs VTMGX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTMGX has a market cap of 287.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTMGX trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTMGX's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTMGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTMGX's competition here
PWM vs RGAGX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 279.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RGAGX trades at $79.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RGAGX's competition here
PWM vs GAFFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 279.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while GAFFX trades at $79.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check GAFFX's competition here
PWM vs AGTHX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 279.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AGTHX trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AGTHX's competition here
PWM vs GFFFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, GFFFX has a market cap of 278.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while GFFFX trades at $79.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GFFFX's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GFFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to GFFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check GFFFX's competition here
PWM vs GFAFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 276.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while GFAFX trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check GFAFX's competition here
PWM vs AFMBX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 275.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AFMBX trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AFMBX's competition here
PWM vs RLBGX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RLBGX trades at $39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RLBGX's competition here
PWM vs ABALX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while ABALX trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check ABALX's competition here
PWM vs AMBFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AMBFX trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AMBFX's competition here
PWM vs BALFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while BALFX trades at $38.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check BALFX's competition here
PWM vs RGABX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 244.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RGABX trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RGABX's competition here
PWM vs RGAAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 239.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RGAAX trades at $68.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RGAAX's competition here
PWM vs GFACX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 233.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while GFACX trades at $66.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check GFACX's competition here
PWM vs VTV Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 227.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTV trades at $206.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTV's competition here
PWM vs ODIDX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, ODIDX has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while ODIDX trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ODIDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ODIDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to ODIDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check ODIDX's competition here
PWM vs GRAG Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, GRAG has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while GRAG trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GRAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to GRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check GRAG's competition here
PWM vs FCTDX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 214B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FCTDX trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FCTDX's competition here
PWM vs VMCIX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VMCIX has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VMCIX trades at $83.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VMCIX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VMCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VMCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VMCIX's competition here
PWM vs VMCPX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VMCPX trades at $410.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VMCPX's competition here
PWM vs VIMAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VIMAX trades at $376.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VIMAX's competition here
PWM vs VO Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 203.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VO trades at $303.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VO's competition here
PWM vs MER-PK Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, MER-PK has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while MER-PK trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas MER-PK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MER-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to MER-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check MER-PK's competition here
PWM vs AICCX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AICCX trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AICCX's competition here
PWM vs AIVSX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AIVSX trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AIVSX's competition here
PWM vs AICFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AICFX trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AICFX's competition here
PWM vs RICBX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RICBX trades at $62.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RICBX's competition here
PWM vs RICAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RICAX trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RICAX's competition here
PWM vs GLD Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, GLD has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while GLD trades at $459.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GLD's P/E ratio is -49.87. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to GLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check GLD's competition here
PWM vs FCNTX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FCNTX trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FCNTX's competition here
PWM vs FCNKX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FCNKX trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FCNKX's competition here
PWM vs IEFA Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while IEFA trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IEFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check IEFA's competition here
PWM vs C-PN Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 173.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while C-PN trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check C-PN's competition here
PWM vs VB Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 171.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VB trades at $278.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VB's competition here
PWM vs VSCIX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VSCIX trades at $133.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VSCIX's competition here
PWM vs BLK Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while BLK trades at $1,081.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check BLK's competition here
PWM vs ANWPX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while ANWPX trades at $72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check ANWPX's competition here
PWM vs CFNAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while CFNAX trades at $95.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check CFNAX's competition here
PWM vs FINFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FINFX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FINFX trades at $95.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FINFX's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FINFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FINFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FINFX's competition here
PWM vs RFNCX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RFNCX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RFNCX trades at $95.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RFNCX's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RFNCX's competition here
PWM vs ANCFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while ANCFX trades at $95.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check ANCFX's competition here
PWM vs AFIFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AFIFX trades at $95.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AFIFX's competition here
PWM vs RNPCX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RNPCX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RNPCX trades at $69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RNPCX's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RNPCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RNPCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RNPCX's competition here
PWM vs FNPFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FNPFX trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FNPFX's competition here
PWM vs RNPGX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RNPGX trades at $72.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RNPGX's competition here
PWM vs NPFFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while NPFFX trades at $71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check NPFFX's competition here
PWM vs FPMAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FPMAX has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FPMAX trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FPMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FPMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FPMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FPMAX's competition here
PWM vs VWO Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VWO has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VWO trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VWO's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VWO's competition here
PWM vs VEMAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VEMAX trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VEMAX's competition here
PWM vs AWSHX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 150.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AWSHX trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AWSHX's competition here
PWM vs RWMFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RWMFX trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RWMFX's competition here
PWM vs FWMIX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FWMIX trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FWMIX's competition here
PWM vs CWMAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while CWMAX trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check CWMAX's competition here
PWM vs WSHFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while WSHFX trades at $66.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check WSHFX's competition here
PWM vs WGIFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, WGIFX has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while WGIFX trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WGIFX's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WGIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to WGIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check WGIFX's competition here
PWM vs WSHCX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while WSHCX trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check WSHCX's competition here
PWM vs RWMBX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RWMBX trades at $65.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RWMBX's competition here
PWM vs BX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while BX trades at $125.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check BX's competition here
PWM vs IEMG Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, IEMG has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while IEMG trades at $74.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IEMG's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IEMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to IEMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check IEMG's competition here
PWM vs AGG Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 140.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AGG trades at $100.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 128.71. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AGG's competition here
PWM vs AEPFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AEPFX trades at $64.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AEPFX's competition here
PWM vs AEGFX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AEGFX trades at $64.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AEGFX's competition here
PWM vs RERHX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RERHX trades at $64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RERHX's competition here
PWM vs RERGX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while RERGX trades at $65.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check RERGX's competition here
PWM vs AEPGX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while AEPGX trades at $65.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check AEPGX's competition here
PWM vs SWPPX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, SWPPX has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while SWPPX trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SWPPX's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWPPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to SWPPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check SWPPX's competition here
PWM vs VITAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 131B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VITAX trades at $378.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VITAX's competition here
PWM vs VGT Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VGT trades at $734.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VGT's competition here
PWM vs IWF Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while IWF trades at $450.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check IWF's competition here
PWM vs NAESX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while NAESX trades at $133.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check NAESX's competition here
PWM vs FSKAX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while FSKAX trades at $189.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check FSKAX's competition here
PWM vs VTTHX Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VTTHX trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VTTHX's competition here
PWM vs VIG Comparison February 2026
PWM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWM stands at 37M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWM is priced at $1.17, while VIG trades at $227.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, PWM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWM is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWM.Check VIG's competition here