Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Corp.
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Corp. PWI.TO Peers
See (PWI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWI.TO | $9.08 | +1.11% | 29.96M | 3.11 | $2.92 | +10.28% |
| BLK.NE | $25.37 | +0.63% | 202.21B | 22.65 | $1.12 | N/A |
| BN.TO | $83.14 | +0.47% | 136.97B | 202.78 | $0.41 | +0.77% |
| BAM.TO | $82.39 | +1.38% | 134.90B | 43.59 | $1.89 | +3.72% |
| VFV.TO | $146.11 | +0.42% | 21.53B | 25.43 | $5.75 | +1.05% |
| ZSP.TO | $90.04 | +0.38% | 17.36B | N/A | N/A | +0.94% |
| PHYS.TO | $33.78 | -2.14% | 15.73B | 5.68 | $5.95 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | $39.14 | +0.36% | 13.79B | 21.21 | $1.85 | +3.28% |
| XEF.TO | $41.74 | -0.17% | 11.42B | 16.40 | $2.55 | +2.50% |
| VUN.TO | $109.91 | +0.30% | 10.68B | 24.83 | $4.43 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
PWI.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 202.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while BLK.NE trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 136.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while BN.TO trades at $83.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 202.78. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 134.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while BAM.TO trades at $82.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 43.59. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VFV.TO trades at $146.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 17.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZSP.TO trades at $90.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 15.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while PHYS.TO trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 13.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XIU.TO trades at $39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XEF.TO trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VUN.TO trades at $109.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while IGM.TO trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZCN.TO trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZEA.TO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VCN.TO trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XIC.TO trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XSP.TO trades at $60.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XUS.TO trades at $51.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while PSLV.TO trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CEF.TO trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XEQT.TO trades at $34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ONEX.TO trades at $101.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VEQT.TO trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CASH.TO trades at $50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VGRO.TO trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CSAV.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VIU.TO trades at $37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZEB.TO trades at $42.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZMMK.TO trades at $49.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while PSA.TO trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZLB.TO trades at $50.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CIX.TO trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VSP.TO trades at $94.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZCS.TO trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while HXS.TO trades at $84.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while HXT.TO trades at $67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VDY.TO trades at $50.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XUU.TO trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while QUU.TO trades at $237.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VBAL.TO trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZUE.TO trades at $80.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XQQ.TO trades at $53.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XSEM.TO trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZWB.TO trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XGRO.TO trades at $31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while TTP.TO trades at $29.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while TPU.TO trades at $46.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while BBUC.TO trades at $40.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XAW.TO trades at $45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while TPE.TO trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XBB.TO trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VEE.TO trades at $40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VXC.TO trades at $65.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while NSCE.TO trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while PFMN.TO trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VCE.TO trades at $56.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XDIV.TO trades at $31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XEC.TO trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XCB.TO trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZQQ.TO trades at $147.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CMR.TO trades at $50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VGG.TO trades at $92.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while MNY.TO trades at $100.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while HSAV.TO trades at $115.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XBAL.TO trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while QCN.TO trades at $156.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XIN.TO trades at $38.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XEI.TO trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZWU.TO trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZLU.TO trades at $54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while QQC.TO trades at $35.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XDV.TO trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CACB.TO trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CBIL.TO trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XFN.TO trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ISIF.TO trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while CYB.TO trades at $76.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XFH.TO trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while FIH-U.TO trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZWC.TO trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XGB.TO trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XSH.TO trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZPR.TO trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while UNC.TO trades at $130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while EQL.TO trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZGB.TO trades at $45.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZEM.TO trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while HMAX.TO trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while HXCN.TO trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VSB.TO trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while RIIN.TO trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XEG.TO trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZUQ.TO trades at $86.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while MUB.TO trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while XWD.TO trades at $96.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while HHL.TO trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while VUS.TO trades at $101.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while FCUV.TO trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while BND.TO trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while ZDV.TO trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.
PWI.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison
PWI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWI.TO stands at 29.96M. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PWI.TO is priced at $9.08, while QDX.TO trades at $130.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, PWI.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWI.TO is more volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWI.TO.