Providence Resources P.l.c.
Providence Resources P.l.c. PVR.L Peers
See (PVR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVR.L | £3.25 | -2.99% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WDS.L | £1,260.00 | N/A | 23.9B | 16.36 | £0.77 | +4.55% |
| NVTK.IL | £70.50 | N/A | 21.1B | 3.67 | £19.21 | N/A |
| 0HTF.L | £587.00 | +0.51% | 15.6B | -16.02 | -£36.63 | N/A |
| 0V1L.L | £104.50 | +0.90% | 12.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0HVD.L | £13.57 | +1.75% | 9.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.76% |
| HBR.L | £189.00 | +0.37% | 2.7B | -27.00 | -£0.07 | +9.39% |
| ITH.L | £146.20 | +0.69% | 2.4B | -29.24 | -£0.05 | +18.12% |
| ENOG.L | £890.00 | +1.89% | 1.6B | 19.35 | £0.46 | +4.33% |
| SEPL.L | £223.50 | +0.68% | 1.3B | 10.16 | £0.22 | +2.73% |
Stock Comparison
PVR.L vs WDS.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, WDS.L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while WDS.L trades at £1,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDS.L's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to WDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs NVTK.IL Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, NVTK.IL has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while NVTK.IL trades at £70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTK.IL's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVTK.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to NVTK.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs 0HTF.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HTF.L has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while 0HTF.L trades at £587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HTF.L's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0HTF.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to 0HTF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs 0V1L.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0V1L.L has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while 0V1L.L trades at £104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V1L.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V1L.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to 0V1L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs 0HVD.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HVD.L has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while 0HVD.L trades at £13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0HVD.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to 0HVD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs HBR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, HBR.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while HBR.L trades at £189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBR.L's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBR.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to HBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ITH.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ITH.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ITH.L trades at £146.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITH.L's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITH.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to ITH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ENOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ENOG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ENOG.L trades at £890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENOG.L's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENOG.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to ENOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SEPL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SEPL.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SEPL.L trades at £223.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPL.L's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEPL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to SEPL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs DEC.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, DEC.L has a market cap of 835.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while DEC.L trades at £1,042.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEC.L's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEC.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to DEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs KOS.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, KOS.L has a market cap of 664.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while KOS.L trades at £139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOS.L's P/E ratio is -69.50. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to KOS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SQZ.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SQZ.L has a market cap of 595.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SQZ.L trades at £151.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZ.L's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SQZ.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to SQZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SAVE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SAVE.L has a market cap of 439.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SAVE.L trades at £26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAVE.L's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAVE.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to SAVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs 0MDP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0MDP.L has a market cap of 358.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while 0MDP.L trades at £6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0MDP.L's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0MDP.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to 0MDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs GKP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, GKP.L has a market cap of 339.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while GKP.L trades at £156.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKP.L's P/E ratio is 78.30. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GKP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to GKP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PTAL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PTAL.L has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PTAL.L trades at £34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAL.L's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTAL.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to PTAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PANR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PANR.L has a market cap of 293.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PANR.L trades at £25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANR.L's P/E ratio is -25.65. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANR.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to PANR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs RKH.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, RKH.L has a market cap of 291.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while RKH.L trades at £45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKH.L's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to RKH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs EGY.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, EGY.L has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while EGY.L trades at £255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGY.L's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to EGY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs TLW.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, TLW.L has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while TLW.L trades at £16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLW.L's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLW.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to TLW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ENQ.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ENQ.L has a market cap of 213.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ENQ.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQ.L's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENQ.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to ENQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs CNE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CNE.L has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CNE.L trades at £228.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNE.L's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNE.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs HUR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, HUR.L has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while HUR.L trades at £7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUR.L's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUR.L's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs I3E.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, I3E.L has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while I3E.L trades at £12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I3E.L's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to I3E.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to I3E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs GENL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, GENL.L has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while GENL.L trades at £51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENL.L's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENL.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to GENL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs GTE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, GTE.L has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while GTE.L trades at £355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTE.L's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTE.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to GTE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs KIST.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, KIST.L has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while KIST.L trades at £150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIST.L's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIST.L's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to KIST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs JSE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, JSE.L has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while JSE.L trades at £20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSE.L's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JSE.L's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to JSE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs AET.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, AET.L has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while AET.L trades at £46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AET.L's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AET.L's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to AET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PHAR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PHAR.L has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PHAR.L trades at £20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAR.L's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHAR.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to PHAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SLE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SLE.L has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SLE.L trades at £16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLE.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to SLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs BCE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, BCE.L has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while BCE.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCE.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to BCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs FOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, FOG.L has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while FOG.L trades at £6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOG.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to FOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ZPHR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ZPHR.L has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ZPHR.L trades at £3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPHR.L's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZPHR.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to ZPHR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs CASP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CASP.L has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CASP.L trades at £2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CASP.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CASP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs BOR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, BOR.L has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while BOR.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOR.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to BOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs WEN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, WEN.L has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while WEN.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEN.L's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEN.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PVR.L has daily volatility of 4.11 and WEN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PVR.L vs ENW.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ENW.L has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ENW.L trades at £16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENW.L's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENW.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to ENW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs AEX.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, AEX.L has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while AEX.L trades at £1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEX.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to AEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs AXL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, AXL.L has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while AXL.L trades at £16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXL.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AXL.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to AXL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ZEN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ZEN.L has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ZEN.L trades at £14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEN.L's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEN.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to ZEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs TXP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, TXP.L has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while TXP.L trades at £18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXP.L's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TXP.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to TXP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs JOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, JOG.L has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while JOG.L trades at £130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOG.L's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JOG.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to JOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs VLU.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, VLU.L has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while VLU.L trades at £35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLU.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLU.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to VLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ECO.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ECO.L has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ECO.L trades at £10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECO.L's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECO.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to ECO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs TRIN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, TRIN.L has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while TRIN.L trades at £68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRIN.L's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRIN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to TRIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PRD.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PRD.L has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PRD.L trades at £3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRD.L's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to PRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs EDR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, EDR.L has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while EDR.L trades at £4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDR.L's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDR.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PVR.L has daily volatility of 4.11 and EDR.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PVR.L vs MATD.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, MATD.L has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while MATD.L trades at £1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MATD.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to MATD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PXEN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PXEN.L has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PXEN.L trades at £5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXEN.L's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXEN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to PXEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs BOIL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, BOIL.L has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while BOIL.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOIL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to BOIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs CHAR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CHAR.L has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CHAR.L trades at £1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHAR.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHAR.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CHAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs CEG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CEG.L has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CEG.L trades at £7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEG.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEG.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs IGAS.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, IGAS.L has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while IGAS.L trades at £14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAS.L's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IGAS.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to IGAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PMG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PMG.L has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PMG.L trades at £15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMG.L's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to PMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs UPL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, UPL.L has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while UPL.L trades at £1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to UPL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SOU.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SOU.L has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SOU.L trades at £0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOU.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOU.L's ROE of -8.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to SOU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs 88E.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, 88E.L has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while 88E.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 88E.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 88E.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to 88E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs INDI.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, INDI.L has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while INDI.L trades at £6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI.L's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INDI.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to INDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ANGS.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ANGS.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ANGS.L trades at £0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGS.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGS.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to ANGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs CAD.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CAD.L has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CAD.L trades at £4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAD.L's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAD.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs TLOU.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, TLOU.L has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while TLOU.L trades at £0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLOU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLOU.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to TLOU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SOUC.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SOUC.L has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SOUC.L trades at £3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUC.L's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOUC.L's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to SOUC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs LBE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, LBE.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while LBE.L trades at £18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBE.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to LBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs MSMN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, MSMN.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while MSMN.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSMN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSMN.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to MSMN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs UJO.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, UJO.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while UJO.L trades at £9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UJO.L's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UJO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to UJO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PPP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PPP.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PPP.L trades at £9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPP.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to PPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs BLOE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, BLOE.L has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while BLOE.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLOE.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to BLOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ORCA.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ORCA.L has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ORCA.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCA.L's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORCA.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to ORCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs GBP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, GBP.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while GBP.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBP.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to GBP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs TRP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, TRP.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while TRP.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to TRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs NOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, NOG.L has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while NOG.L trades at £3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOG.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOG.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to NOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs EOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, EOG.L has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while EOG.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EOG.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to EOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs IOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, IOG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while IOG.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IOG.L's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PVR.L has daily volatility of 4.11 and IOG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PVR.L vs CORO.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CORO.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CORO.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORO.L's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORO.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CORO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SENX.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SENX.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SENX.L trades at £3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SENX.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENX.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to SENX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs DELT.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, DELT.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while DELT.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELT.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DELT.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to DELT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs BLVN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, BLVN.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while BLVN.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVN.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLVN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to BLVN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs RBD.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, RBD.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while RBD.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBD.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to RBD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs GEEC.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, GEEC.L has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while GEEC.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEEC.L's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEEC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to GEEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs UOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, UOG.L has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while UOG.L trades at £0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UOG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to UOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SYN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SYN.L has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SYN.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYN.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to SYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs CLON.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, CLON.L has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while CLON.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLON.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLON.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to CLON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs WCAT.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, WCAT.L has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while WCAT.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WCAT.L's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to WCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PET.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PET.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PET.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PET.L's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to PET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs COPL.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, COPL.L has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while COPL.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COPL.L's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to COPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs SCIR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, SCIR.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while SCIR.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCIR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to SCIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs TOM.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, TOM.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while TOM.L trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOM.L's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to TOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs UKOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, UKOG.L has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while UKOG.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UKOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UKOG.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to UKOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs AST.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, AST.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while AST.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AST.L's ROE of +4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to AST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs STA.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, STA.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while STA.L trades at £1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STA.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STA.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to STA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs LOGP.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, LOGP.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while LOGP.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOGP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to LOGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ADME.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ADME.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ADME.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADME.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADME.L's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to ADME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs MEN.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, MEN.L has a market cap of 990.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while MEN.L trades at £8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MEN.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to MEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs NTOG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, NTOG.L has a market cap of 938.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while NTOG.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to NTOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs PTR.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, PTR.L has a market cap of 857.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while PTR.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTR.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to PTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs ARG.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, ARG.L has a market cap of 823K. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while ARG.L trades at £0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PVR.L has daily volatility of 4.11 and ARG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PVR.L vs EME.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, EME.L has a market cap of 821.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while EME.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EME.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EME.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is less volatile compared to EME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.
PVR.L vs WTE.L Comparison
PVR.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVR.L stands at 0. In comparison, WTE.L has a market cap of 684.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PVR.L is priced at £3.25, while WTE.L trades at £0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PVR.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WTE.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVR.L is more volatile compared to WTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVR.L.