Pretium Resources Inc.
Pretium Resources Inc. PVG.TO Peers
See (PVG.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVG.TO | $19.15 | -2.79% | N/A | -76.60 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | $67.97 | -2.51% | 75.65B | 11.11 | $6.12 | +2.00% |
| AEM.TO | $146.37 | -1.80% | 74.00B | 22.35 | $6.55 | +1.49% |
| WPM.TO | $106.89 | -2.28% | 48.49B | 56.26 | $1.90 | +0.80% |
| ABX.TO | $24.63 | -2.57% | 42.35B | 13.39 | $1.84 | +2.20% |
| FNV.TO | $217.07 | -1.36% | 41.80B | 48.45 | $4.48 | +0.67% |
| K.TO | $18.85 | -1.72% | 23.19B | 13.96 | $1.35 | +0.87% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $33.26 | -3.62% | 13.99B | 38.67 | $0.86 | +0.29% |
| LUG.TO | $55.22 | -4.53% | 13.28B | 17.81 | $3.10 | +1.39% |
Stock Comparison
PVG.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 75.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NGT.TO trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 74.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while AEM.TO trades at $146.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 48.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while WPM.TO trades at $106.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 56.26. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 42.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ABX.TO trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 41.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while FNV.TO trades at $217.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 48.45. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs K.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 23.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while K.TO trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 13.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while AGI.TO trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while LUG.TO trades at $55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while EDV.TO trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -64.83. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while OR.TO trades at $31.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while BTO.TO trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ELD.TO trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while IMG.TO trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NGD.TO trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while PRU.TO trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while OLA.TO trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while OGC.TO trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while EQX.TO trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while TXG.TO trades at $40.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SSL.TO trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 80.39. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while DPM.TO trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while KNT.TO trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SSRM.TO trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while WDO.TO trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CXB.TO trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while WGX.TO trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CG.TO trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ORA.TO trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while AAUC.TO trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NG.TO trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SEA.TO trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -45.46. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CNL.TO trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while RUP.TO trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -151.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 719.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while GTWO.TO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -74.75. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 695.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while MSA.TO trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 541.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ORE.TO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 536.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ASE.CN trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 514.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while GAU.TO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 449.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while MND.TO trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 403.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while PRB.TO trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 395.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while FDR.V trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 305.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while IAU.TO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 241.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SBI.TO trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 240.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while JAG.TO trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -27.55. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 209.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while STGO.TO trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 207.79M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 199.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while DNG.TO trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 193.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ITH.TO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 167.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while FF.TO trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 163.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 137.61M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while LN.TO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 129.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while LGD.TO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 126.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while STLR.TO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 115.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while GHRT.V trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 115.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SANU.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 103.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NEXG.V trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs G.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 94.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while G.TO trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 93.34M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while BSX.TO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 92.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while XTG.TO trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 201.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 92.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CBR.V trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 90.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ELO.TO trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 66.26M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while HMR.V trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 66.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CCM.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CGC.V trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 61.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 49.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while VEIN.V trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 43.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while USGD.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 36.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ESM.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NVO.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 26.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 26.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while AMM.TO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 24.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while GRC.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 21.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while VAU.V trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 17.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while PME.TO trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 15.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while NOM.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs ONAU.V Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ONAU.V has a market cap of 15.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while ONAU.V trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas ONAU.V's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONAU.V's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to ONAU.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.
PVG.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
PVG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PVG.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 15.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PVG.TO is priced at $19.15, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PVG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -76.60, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, PVG.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVG.TO is more volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVG.TO.