Pulsar Group plc
Pulsar Group plc PULS.L Peers
See (PULS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PULS.L | £39.50 | -3.16% | 53.6M | -7.90 | -£0.05 | N/A |
| 0A7O.L | £389.66 | +0.14% | 98.9B | -7.31 | -£53.33 | +0.09% |
| 0A3O.L | £118.98 | -1.11% | 41.4B | 39660.00 | £0.00 | N/A |
| 0IL6.L | £294.34 | +1.26% | 16.9B | 51.87 | £5.68 | N/A |
| SGE.L | £1,260.00 | +0.16% | 12.2B | 36.00 | £0.35 | +1.65% |
| 0U3Q.L | £200.00 | +9.76% | 5.2B | 92.21 | £2.17 | +0.95% |
| 0QOA.L | £74.54 | -5.84% | 4.2B | 30.90 | £2.41 | +1.65% |
| 0OA4.L | £251.00 | +1.95% | 4B | 1402.23 | £0.18 | +0.11% |
| 0DWV.L | £197.40 | -3.00% | 3.9B | 125.65 | £1.57 | +0.33% |
| 0M2A.L | £13.20 | -0.23% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.46% |
Stock Comparison
PULS.L vs 0A7O.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0A7O.L has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0A7O.L trades at £389.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0A7O.L's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0A7O.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0A7O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0A3O.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0A3O.L has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0A3O.L trades at £118.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0A3O.L's P/E ratio is 39660.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0A3O.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0A3O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0IL6.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0IL6.L has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0IL6.L trades at £294.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0IL6.L's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0IL6.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0IL6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SGE.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SGE.L has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SGE.L trades at £1,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SGE.L's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGE.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to SGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0U3Q.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0U3Q.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0U3Q.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0U3Q.L's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0U3Q.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0U3Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0QOA.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0QOA.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0QOA.L trades at £74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0QOA.L's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0QOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to 0QOA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0OA4.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0OA4.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0OA4.L trades at £251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0OA4.L's P/E ratio is 1402.23. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0OA4.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0OA4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0DWV.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0DWV.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0DWV.L trades at £197.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0DWV.L's P/E ratio is 125.65. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0DWV.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0DWV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0M2A.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0M2A.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0M2A.L trades at £13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0M2A.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0M2A.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0M2A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs TRST.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, TRST.L has a market cap of 964.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while TRST.L trades at £234.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas TRST.L's P/E ratio is 234.60. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TRST.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to TRST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0RS2.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0RS2.L has a market cap of 938.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0RS2.L trades at £55.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0RS2.L's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0RS2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0RS2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs KNOS.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, KNOS.L has a market cap of 931.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while KNOS.L trades at £763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas KNOS.L's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KNOS.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to KNOS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0GM9.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0GM9.L has a market cap of 880M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0GM9.L trades at £153.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0GM9.L's P/E ratio is -47.53. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0GM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0GM9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs LTG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, LTG.L has a market cap of 791.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while LTG.L trades at £99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas LTG.L's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LTG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to LTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ALFA.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ALFA.L has a market cap of 709.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ALFA.L trades at £239.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ALFA.L's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALFA.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to ALFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs GBG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, GBG.L has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while GBG.L trades at £247.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas GBG.L's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GBG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to GBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ATG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ATG.L has a market cap of 583.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ATG.L trades at £481.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ATG.L's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ATG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ATG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs CER.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, CER.L has a market cap of 560.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while CER.L trades at £1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas CER.L's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CER.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to CER.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs NCC.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, NCC.L has a market cap of 515.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while NCC.L trades at £163.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas NCC.L's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NCC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to NCC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs DEV.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, DEV.L has a market cap of 508.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while DEV.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas DEV.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DEV.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to DEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0L8Z.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0L8Z.L has a market cap of 380.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0L8Z.L trades at £4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0L8Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0L8Z.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0L8Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs PBEE.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, PBEE.L has a market cap of 379.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while PBEE.L trades at £160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas PBEE.L's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PBEE.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to PBEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs IQG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, IQG.L has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while IQG.L trades at £478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas IQG.L's P/E ratio is -239.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IQG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to IQG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs BIG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, BIG.L has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while BIG.L trades at £98.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas BIG.L's P/E ratio is 98.60. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to BIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs IDOX.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, IDOX.L has a market cap of 272.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while IDOX.L trades at £59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas IDOX.L's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IDOX.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to IDOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs DOTD.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, DOTD.L has a market cap of 242.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while DOTD.L trades at £79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas DOTD.L's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DOTD.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to DOTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ACSO.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ACSO.L has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ACSO.L trades at £516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ACSO.L's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACSO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to ACSO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs NET.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, NET.L has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while NET.L trades at £115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas NET.L's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NET.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to NET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0N6K.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0N6K.L has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0N6K.L trades at £3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0N6K.L's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0N6K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to 0N6K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs APTD.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, APTD.L has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while APTD.L trades at £311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas APTD.L's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APTD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to APTD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0AAW.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0AAW.L has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0AAW.L trades at £14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0AAW.L's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0AAW.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0AAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs TRCS.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, TRCS.L has a market cap of 151.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while TRCS.L trades at £505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas TRCS.L's P/E ratio is 252.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TRCS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to TRCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ELCO.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ELCO.L has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ELCO.L trades at £170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ELCO.L's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELCO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ELCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs GHT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, GHT.L has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while GHT.L trades at £161.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas GHT.L's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GHT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to GHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SAAS.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SAAS.L has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SAAS.L trades at £104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SAAS.L's P/E ratio is -52.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SAAS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to SAAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SPE.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SPE.L has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SPE.L trades at £990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SPE.L's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to SPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SPSY.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SPSY.L has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SPSY.L trades at £209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SPSY.L's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPSY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to SPSY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs IGP.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, IGP.L has a market cap of 99.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while IGP.L trades at £170.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas IGP.L's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IGP.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to IGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SPSC.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SPSC.L has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SPSC.L trades at £250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SPSC.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPSC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to SPSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs TRB.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, TRB.L has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while TRB.L trades at £42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas TRB.L's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TRB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to TRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs RM.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, RM.L has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while RM.L trades at £109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas RM.L's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RM.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to RM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs AOM.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, AOM.L has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while AOM.L trades at £120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas AOM.L's P/E ratio is 60.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to AOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0QK1.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0QK1.L has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0QK1.L trades at £59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0QK1.L's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0QK1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0QK1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ACC.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ACC.L has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ACC.L trades at £61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ACC.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to ACC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs WAND.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, WAND.L has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while WAND.L trades at £63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas WAND.L's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WAND.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PULS.L has daily volatility of 3.22 and WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PULS.L vs OMG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, OMG.L has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while OMG.L trades at £58.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas OMG.L's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to OMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs D4T4.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, D4T4.L has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while D4T4.L trades at £177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas D4T4.L's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to D4T4.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to D4T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs EYE.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, EYE.L has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while EYE.L trades at £236.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas EYE.L's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EYE.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to EYE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs CLBS.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, CLBS.L has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while CLBS.L trades at £160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas CLBS.L's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLBS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to CLBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SPA.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SPA.L has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SPA.L trades at £48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SPA.L's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to SPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SKL.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SKL.L has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SKL.L trades at £46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SKL.L's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to SKL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs CRTA.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, CRTA.L has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while CRTA.L trades at £28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas CRTA.L's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRTA.L's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to CRTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SMRT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SMRT.L has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SMRT.L trades at £88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SMRT.L's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMRT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to SMRT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs GETB.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, GETB.L has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while GETB.L trades at £50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas GETB.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GETB.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to GETB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs CHSS.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, CHSS.L has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while CHSS.L trades at £3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas CHSS.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHSS.L's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to CHSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ESYS.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ESYS.L has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ESYS.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ESYS.L's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ESYS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ESYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs TEK.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, TEK.L has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while TEK.L trades at £8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas TEK.L's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TEK.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to TEK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs CRDL.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, CRDL.L has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while CRDL.L trades at £7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas CRDL.L's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRDL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to CRDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs BIRD.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, BIRD.L has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while BIRD.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas BIRD.L's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIRD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to BIRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs CKT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, CKT.L has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while CKT.L trades at £16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas CKT.L's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CKT.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to CKT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ALT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ALT.L has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ALT.L trades at £21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ALT.L's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ALT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ITIM.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ITIM.L has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ITIM.L trades at £49.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ITIM.L's P/E ratio is 49.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ITIM.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ITIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs PEN.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, PEN.L has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while PEN.L trades at £30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas PEN.L's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PEN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to PEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0A8G.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0A8G.L has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0A8G.L trades at £6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0A8G.L's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0A8G.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0A8G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ARC.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ARC.L has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ARC.L trades at £85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ARC.L's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ARC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ZOO.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ZOO.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ZOO.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ZOO.L's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZOO.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ZOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs S247.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, S247.L has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while S247.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas S247.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to S247.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to S247.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ING.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ING.L has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ING.L trades at £64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ING.L's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ING.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to ING.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs TERN.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, TERN.L has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while TERN.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas TERN.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TERN.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to TERN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs EXR.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, EXR.L has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while EXR.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas EXR.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EXR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to EXR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs MBT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, MBT.L has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while MBT.L trades at £1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas MBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MBT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to MBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs TIDE.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, TIDE.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while TIDE.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas TIDE.L's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TIDE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to TIDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 0O8X.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 0O8X.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 0O8X.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 0O8X.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0O8X.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to 0O8X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs 4GBL.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, 4GBL.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while 4GBL.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas 4GBL.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 4GBL.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to 4GBL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs RTOP.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, RTOP.L has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while RTOP.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas RTOP.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RTOP.L's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to RTOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs AIQ.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, AIQ.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while AIQ.L trades at £4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas AIQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AIQ.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to AIQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs RDT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, RDT.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while RDT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas RDT.L's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RDT.L's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to RDT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs OBC.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, OBC.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while OBC.L trades at £15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas OBC.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OBC.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PULS.L has daily volatility of 3.22 and OBC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PULS.L vs SYME.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SYME.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SYME.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SYME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SYME.L's ROE of +6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to SYME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs MBO.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, MBO.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while MBO.L trades at £1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas MBO.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MBO.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to MBO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ACRM.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ACRM.L has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ACRM.L trades at £0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ACRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACRM.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ACRM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs DSG.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, DSG.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while DSG.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas DSG.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DSG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to DSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs SORT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SORT.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SORT.L trades at £23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SORT.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SORT.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to SORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs LOOP.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, LOOP.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while LOOP.L trades at £0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas LOOP.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LOOP.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to LOOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs ENET.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ENET.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ENET.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ENET.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENET.L's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to ENET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs PTRO.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, PTRO.L has a market cap of 954.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while PTRO.L trades at £1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas PTRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PTRO.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PULS.L has daily volatility of 3.22 and PTRO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PULS.L vs INX.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, INX.L has a market cap of 665.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while INX.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas INX.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INX.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to INX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs LSAI.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, LSAI.L has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while LSAI.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas LSAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LSAI.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to LSAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs DMTR.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, DMTR.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while DMTR.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas DMTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DMTR.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PULS.L has daily volatility of 3.22 and DMTR.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PULS.L vs SIM.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, SIM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while SIM.L trades at £13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas SIM.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SIM.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to SIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs AVV.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, AVV.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while AVV.L trades at £3,219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas AVV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AVV.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PULS.L has daily volatility of 3.22 and AVV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PULS.L vs ATQT.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, ATQT.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while ATQT.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas ATQT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ATQT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PULS.L has daily volatility of 3.22 and ATQT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PULS.L vs MNO.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, MNO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while MNO.L trades at £12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas MNO.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MNO.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to MNO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs IDEA.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, IDEA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while IDEA.L trades at £349.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas IDEA.L's P/E ratio is 174.50. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IDEA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is more volatile compared to IDEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.
PULS.L vs VRE.L Comparison
PULS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PULS.L stands at 53.6M. In comparison, VRE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PULS.L is priced at £39.50, while VRE.L trades at £18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PULS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.90, whereas VRE.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PULS.L's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VRE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PULS.L is less volatile compared to VRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PULS.L.