Publicis Groupe S.A.
Publicis Groupe S.A. PUBGY Peers
See (PUBGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUBGY | $27.02 | -1.99% | 27.1B | 14.53 | $1.86 | +2.96% |
| PGPEF | $107.00 | +8.08% | 26.8B | 14.40 | $7.43 | N/A |
| WPPGF | $8.07 | -1.36% | 8.7B | 12.23 | $0.66 | +6.29% |
| DNTUY | $21.55 | -0.32% | 5.6B | -4.23 | -$5.09 | +2.99% |
| HKUOY | $14.66 | -2.40% | 5.4B | 35.76 | $0.41 | N/A |
| DNTUF | $19.31 | -19.00% | 5B | -3.79 | -$5.09 | +2.26% |
| CYGIY | $4.81 | +13.44% | 4.9B | 32.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 26.93 | $0.30 | +1.39% |
| JCDXF | $17.40 | +12.62% | 3.7B | 12.70 | $1.37 | +3.56% |
| JCDXY | $7.93 | N/A | 3.4B | 11.49 | $0.69 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
PUBGY vs PGPEF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PGPEF trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs WPPGF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while WPPGF trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs DNTUY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while DNTUY trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs HKUOY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs DNTUF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while DNTUF trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CYGIY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CYGIY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CYAGF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs JCDXF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs JCDXY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while JCDXY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs HKUOF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs SOTDF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs AIAPF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs FRRFF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs SPIDY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 487.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs YUGVF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 487M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while YUGVF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 416.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs NXFNF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs MCCLF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs TTTPF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs PTMEY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PTMEY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs PROM Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs SCPPF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while SCPPF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs KLTI Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs VCCLF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs PCOFF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs EDHL Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while EDHL trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 424.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs GTNLF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CAUUF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs OPESF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while OPESF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CYPXF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CYPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -75.80. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs GMGZ Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while GMGZ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs NHLPF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs IFUS Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while IFUS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs EZOO Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CNFN Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CNFN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ACHN Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs SNIPF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while SNIPF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs SPTY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while SPTY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs AATV Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs TGNT Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while TGNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs UCPA Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs INEOF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while INEOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs VYBE Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs MMDDF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs BYOC Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CMGR Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs DBMM Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs FBOP Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs PVSP Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs MMND Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs LIGA Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CEENF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CMGO Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs DMSL Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs GOOLF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 341K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ATXMF Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 275.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs SNPW Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 196.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while SNPW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs WWIO Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ACTL Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs NXMR Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs TRBO Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ITKH Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs PRKI Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs NBDR Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs EPGC Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs RFII Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs GBXI Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs PSYC Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs NWCN Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs CYGT Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs GTRL Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while GTRL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ISML Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs WGEE Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs BXNG Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs BWAV Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ADST Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs LOGX Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs VPSN Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs MYRY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs LTMP Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ADTY Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.
PUBGY vs ZULU Comparison
PUBGY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUBGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUBGY is priced at $27.02, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUBGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUBGY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUBGY is less volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUBGY.