Publicis Groupe S.A.
Publicis Groupe S.A. (PUB.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PUB.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUB.PA | €76.52 | +1.84% | 18.8B | 11.48 | €6.52 | +4.81% |
| DEC.PA | €19.70 | +19.25% | 4.1B | 16.93 | €1.12 | +2.90% |
| DKUPL.PA | €24.00 | +0.00% | 95.3M | 11.71 | €2.05 | N/A |
| ALREW.PA | €1.57 | -5.41% | 90.8M | 2.82 | €0.56 | +1.27% |
| HCO.PA | €3.53 | -3.02% | 70.2M | 0.08 | €46.89 | +35.01% |
| ALBLD.PA | €14.15 | -2.75% | 66.3M | 13.54 | €1.06 | N/A |
| ALMIL.PA | €30.00 | +0.00% | 64.8M | 20.13 | €1.49 | N/A |
| LOCAL.PA | €4.36 | -1.69% | 60.1M | 0.15 | €28.93 | N/A |
| MLBMD.PA | €8.00 | +0.00% | 37.6M | -6.20 | -€1.29 | N/A |
| ALHOP.PA | €12.00 | -1.64% | 36.2M | 10.25 | €1.18 | +5.37% |
Stock Comparison
PUB.PA vs DEC.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DEC.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while DEC.PA trades at €19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DEC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEC.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to DEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check DEC.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs DKUPL.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DKUPL.PA has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while DKUPL.PA trades at €24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DKUPL.PA's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DKUPL.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to DKUPL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check DKUPL.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALREW.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALREW.PA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALREW.PA trades at €1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALREW.PA's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALREW.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALREW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALREW.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs HCO.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HCO.PA has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while HCO.PA trades at €3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HCO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCO.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to HCO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check HCO.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALBLD.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALBLD.PA has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALBLD.PA trades at €14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALBLD.PA's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALBLD.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALBLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALBLD.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALMIL.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALMIL.PA has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALMIL.PA trades at €30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALMIL.PA's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMIL.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALMIL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALMIL.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs LOCAL.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LOCAL.PA has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while LOCAL.PA trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas LOCAL.PA's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOCAL.PA's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to LOCAL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check LOCAL.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs MLBMD.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MLBMD.PA has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while MLBMD.PA trades at €8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MLBMD.PA's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLBMD.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to MLBMD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check MLBMD.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALHOP.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALHOP.PA has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALHOP.PA trades at €12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALHOP.PA's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALHOP.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALHOP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALHOP.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALMAK.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALMAK.PA has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALMAK.PA trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALMAK.PA's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMAK.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALMAK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALMAK.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALISP.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALISP.PA has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALISP.PA trades at €1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALISP.PA's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALISP.PA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALISP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALISP.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALMTA.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALMTA.PA has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALMTA.PA trades at €1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALMTA.PA's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMTA.PA's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALMTA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALMTA.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALFUM.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALFUM.PA has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALFUM.PA trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALFUM.PA's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALFUM.PA's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALFUM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALFUM.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALNXT.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALNXT.PA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALNXT.PA trades at €0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALNXT.PA's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALNXT.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALNXT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALNXT.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALBIZ.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALBIZ.PA has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALBIZ.PA trades at €2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALBIZ.PA's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALBIZ.PA's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALBIZ.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALBIZ.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ADUX.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ADUX.PA has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ADUX.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ADUX.PA's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADUX.PA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ADUX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ADUX.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALQWA.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALQWA.PA has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALQWA.PA trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALQWA.PA's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALQWA.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALQWA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALQWA.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALPRI.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALPRI.PA has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALPRI.PA trades at €6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALPRI.PA's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALPRI.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALPRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALPRI.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs MLHPE.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MLHPE.PA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while MLHPE.PA trades at €5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MLHPE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLHPE.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to MLHPE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check MLHPE.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALINV.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALINV.PA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALINV.PA trades at €0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALINV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALINV.PA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALINV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALINV.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALKLA.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALKLA.PA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALKLA.PA trades at €0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALKLA.PA's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALKLA.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALKLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALKLA.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs MLAUD.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MLAUD.PA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while MLAUD.PA trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MLAUD.PA's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLAUD.PA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to MLAUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check MLAUD.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALSRS.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALSRS.PA has a market cap of 657.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALSRS.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALSRS.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSRS.PA's ROE of +2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALSRS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALSRS.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALALO.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALALO.PA has a market cap of 56.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALALO.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALALO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALALO.PA's ROE of +7.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALALO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALALO.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALANT.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALANT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALANT.PA trades at €3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALANT.PA's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALANT.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALANT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALANT.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALP.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALP.PA trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALP.PA's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALP.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALP.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs HOP.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HOP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while HOP.PA trades at €14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HOP.PA's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOP.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to HOP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check HOP.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALEMK.BR Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALEMK.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALEMK.BR trades at €29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALEMK.BR's P/E ratio is 204.23. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALEMK.BR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALEMK.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALEMK.BR's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALADM.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALADM.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALADM.PA trades at €1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALADM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALADM.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALADM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALADM.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs MLIOC.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MLIOC.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while MLIOC.PA trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MLIOC.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLIOC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to MLIOC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check MLIOC.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALMNG.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALMNG.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALMNG.PA trades at €0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALMNG.PA's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMNG.PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALMNG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALMNG.PA's competition here
PUB.PA vs ALATF.PA Comparison March 2026
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALATF.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €76.52, while ALATF.PA trades at €7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ALATF.PA's P/E ratio is -260.67. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALATF.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALATF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.Check ALATF.PA's competition here