Publicis Groupe S.A.
Publicis Groupe S.A. PUB.PA Peers
See (PUB.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUB.PA | €95.14 | +0.25% | 23.9B | 14.53 | €6.55 | +3.57% |
| DEC.PA | €15.89 | -0.13% | 3.4B | 13.13 | €1.21 | +3.46% |
| DKUPL.PA | €30.10 | -5.94% | 119.6M | 12.19 | €2.47 | N/A |
| ALBLD.PA | €22.60 | N/A | 104.3M | 24.04 | €0.94 | N/A |
| LOCAL.PA | €2.68 | +2.29% | 89.3M | 0.34 | €7.90 | N/A |
| ALREW.PA | €1.52 | -3.68% | 82.4M | 2.81 | €0.54 | N/A |
| HCO.PA | €3.67 | +4.86% | 72.1M | 0.08 | €47.00 | +27.25% |
| ALMIL.PA | €30.00 | N/A | 64.8M | 20.13 | €1.49 | N/A |
| ALHOP.PA | €18.45 | -1.86% | 54.9M | 11.53 | €1.60 | +3.52% |
| MLBMD.PA | €8.00 | N/A | 37.6M | -6.20 | -€1.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PUB.PA vs DEC.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DEC.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while DEC.PA trades at €15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DEC.PA's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEC.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to DEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs DKUPL.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DKUPL.PA has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while DKUPL.PA trades at €30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DKUPL.PA's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DKUPL.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to DKUPL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALBLD.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALBLD.PA has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALBLD.PA trades at €22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALBLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALBLD.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALBLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs LOCAL.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LOCAL.PA has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while LOCAL.PA trades at €2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas LOCAL.PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOCAL.PA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to LOCAL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALREW.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALREW.PA has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALREW.PA trades at €1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALREW.PA's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALREW.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALREW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs HCO.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, HCO.PA has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while HCO.PA trades at €3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas HCO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCO.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to HCO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALMIL.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALMIL.PA has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALMIL.PA trades at €30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALMIL.PA's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMIL.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALMIL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALHOP.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALHOP.PA has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALHOP.PA trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALHOP.PA's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALHOP.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALHOP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs MLBMD.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MLBMD.PA has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while MLBMD.PA trades at €8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MLBMD.PA's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLBMD.PA's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to MLBMD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALISP.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALISP.PA has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALISP.PA trades at €2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALISP.PA's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALISP.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALISP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALMAK.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALMAK.PA has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALMAK.PA trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALMAK.PA's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMAK.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALMAK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALMTA.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALMTA.PA has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALMTA.PA trades at €1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALMTA.PA's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMTA.PA's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALMTA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALBIZ.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALBIZ.PA has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALBIZ.PA trades at €3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALBIZ.PA's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALBIZ.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALBIZ.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALNXT.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALNXT.PA has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALNXT.PA trades at €0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALNXT.PA's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALNXT.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALNXT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALFUM.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALFUM.PA has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALFUM.PA trades at €6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALFUM.PA's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALFUM.PA's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALFUM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALQWA.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALQWA.PA has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALQWA.PA trades at €2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALQWA.PA's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALQWA.PA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALQWA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ADUX.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ADUX.PA has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ADUX.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ADUX.PA's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADUX.PA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ADUX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALPRI.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALPRI.PA has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALPRI.PA trades at €6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALPRI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALPRI.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALPRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALINV.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALINV.PA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALINV.PA trades at €1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALINV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALINV.PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALINV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs MLHPE.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MLHPE.PA has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while MLHPE.PA trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MLHPE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLHPE.PA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to MLHPE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALKLA.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALKLA.PA has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALKLA.PA trades at €0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALKLA.PA's P/E ratio is -93.40. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALKLA.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALKLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs MLAUD.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MLAUD.PA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while MLAUD.PA trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MLAUD.PA's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLAUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to MLAUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALSRS.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALSRS.PA has a market cap of 773K. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALSRS.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALSRS.PA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSRS.PA's ROE of -8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALSRS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALALO.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALALO.PA has a market cap of 297.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALALO.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALALO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALALO.PA's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALALO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALMNG.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALMNG.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALMNG.PA trades at €0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALMNG.PA's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALMNG.PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALMNG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALATF.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALATF.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALATF.PA trades at €7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALATF.PA's P/E ratio is -260.67. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALATF.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALATF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALEMK.BR Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALEMK.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALEMK.BR trades at €29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALEMK.BR's P/E ratio is 204.23. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALEMK.BR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALEMK.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALADM.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALADM.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALADM.PA trades at €1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALADM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALADM.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALADM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALANT.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALANT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALANT.PA trades at €3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALANT.PA's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALANT.PA's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to ALANT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs MLIOC.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MLIOC.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while MLIOC.PA trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MLIOC.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLIOC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to MLIOC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs ALP.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while ALP.PA trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ALP.PA's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALP.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is less volatile compared to ALP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.
PUB.PA vs HOP.PA Comparison
PUB.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUB.PA stands at 23.9B. In comparison, HOP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUB.PA is priced at €95.14, while HOP.PA trades at €14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUB.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas HOP.PA's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, PUB.PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOP.PA's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PUB.PA is more volatile compared to HOP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUB.PA.