PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited
PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited PTGCF Peers
See (PTGCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTGCF | $0.96 | N/A | 2.60B | 19.11 | $0.05 | +1.54% |
| SHECF | $31.21 | N/A | 61.79B | 17.15 | $1.82 | +0.01% |
| SHECY | $15.12 | +2.09% | 59.87B | 16.43 | $0.92 | +0.74% |
| BFFAF | $48.65 | -2.70% | 43.49B | 52.31 | $0.93 | +5.90% |
| BASFY | $12.16 | -1.10% | 43.41B | 52.87 | $0.23 | +4.11% |
| SLMNP | $880.00 | N/A | 25.96B | 967.03 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| PCHUY | $4.26 | +19.72% | 19.21B | -4.02 | -$1.06 | +1.74% |
| TYNPF | $36.26 | +0.96% | 15.70B | 23.24 | $1.56 | +0.96% |
| AHKSF | $7.41 | N/A | 10.06B | 10.90 | $0.68 | +3.47% |
| AHKSY | $13.71 | +1.05% | 9.31B | 10.08 | $1.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PTGCF vs SHECF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 61.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SHECF trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SHECY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 59.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SHECY trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs BFFAF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 43.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BFFAF trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 52.31. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs BASFY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 43.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BASFY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 52.87. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SLMNP Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SLMNP trades at $880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 967.03. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and SLMNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs PCHUY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 19.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while PCHUY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs TYNPF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while TYNPF trades at $36.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs AHKSF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 10.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while AHKSF trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs AHKSY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while AHKSY trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs IMCDY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 8.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while IMCDY trades at $69.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs MTLHY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while MTLHY trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs GNENF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while GNENF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs MTLHF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while MTLHF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and MTLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs PECGF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while PECGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs BCHMF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BCHMF trades at $64.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SOMMF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs KURRY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while KURRY trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs TOSCF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while TOSCF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs NNCHY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while NNCHY trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and NNCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs SHWDF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SHWDY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SHWDY trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SOMMY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SOMMY trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and SOMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs GNENY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while GNENY trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and GNENY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs KURRF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SLVYY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SLVYY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SVYSF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SVYSF trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs KPLUY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while KPLUY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 880.00. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs KOYJF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while KOYJF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and KOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs INDOY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs RBTEF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while RBTEF trades at $930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and RBTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs DENKF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DENKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and DENKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs MXCHF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while MXCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and MXCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs NPKYY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs NPKYF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs TOAGF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while TOAGF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs VYTPF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs LNZNF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while LNZNF trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs FRRSF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs BRGAY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs MXCHY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 653.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while MXCHY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs SGLFF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 446.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while SGLFF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and SGLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs TYGIF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 380.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs CDSAF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and CDSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs NNXPF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 288.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while NNXPF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs CRDE Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PTGCF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.
PTGCF vs CNSJF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.14M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and CNSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs BNOW Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BNOW's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs PLYR Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 67.73M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while PLYR trades at $60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs BLGO Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 64.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BLGO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -21.44. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs BSWGF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while BSWGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs FGPHF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 20.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while FGPHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs CHHYF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while CHHYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs AGTT Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while AGTT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs FHELF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 3.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and FHELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs EESE Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs OPCGF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 433634.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs CHCC Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165082.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs AFPW Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141092.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs HZRGF Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 138317.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while HZRGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs FLRE Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22253.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs LBTI Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18599.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs VULC Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9780.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF and VULC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PTGCF vs NUEC Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2421.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs MKDTY Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1218.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.
PTGCF vs RKTE Comparison
PTGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTGCF stands at 2.60B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511.00. Regarding current trading prices, PTGCF is priced at $0.96, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.11, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTGCF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PTGCF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTGCF.