Port of Tauranga Limited
Port of Tauranga Limited (PTAUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PTAUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTAUF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 57.14 | $0.07 | +3.22% |
| CICOY | $9.79 | +2.51% | 34.6B | 4.53 | $2.15 | +10.75% |
| AMKAF | $2,159.20 | +2.82% | 34.2B | 4.80 | $450.03 | +7.79% |
| AMKBF | $2,150.00 | +3.22% | 33.7B | 4.78 | $449.92 | +7.61% |
| AMKBY | $10.82 | +1.50% | 32.7B | 4.82 | $2.25 | +7.52% |
| CICOF | $1.73 | -1.98% | 30.9B | 4.02 | $0.43 | +12.44% |
| HLAGF | $155.55 | -0.00% | 27.3B | 9.23 | $16.85 | +6.18% |
| HPGLY | $77.00 | +0.00% | 27.1B | 9.14 | $8.42 | +6.03% |
| ICTEF | $8.05 | -0.86% | 16.3B | 19.17 | $0.42 | +3.07% |
| NPNYY | $7.38 | +0.41% | 15.7B | 5.10 | $1.44 | +3.96% |
Stock Comparison
PTAUF vs CICOY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CICOY trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CICOY's competition here
PTAUF vs AMKAF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while AMKAF trades at $2,159.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check AMKAF's competition here
PTAUF vs AMKBF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while AMKBF trades at $2,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check AMKBF's competition here
PTAUF vs AMKBY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while AMKBY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check AMKBY's competition here
PTAUF vs CICOF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CICOF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CICOF's competition here
PTAUF vs HLAGF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HLAGF trades at $155.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HLAGF's competition here
PTAUF vs HPGLY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HPGLY trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HPGLY's competition here
PTAUF vs ICTEF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while ICTEF trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check ICTEF's competition here
PTAUF vs NPNYY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while NPNYY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check NPNYY's competition here
PTAUF vs NYUKF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while NYUKF trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check NYUKF's competition here
PTAUF vs OROVY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while OROVY trades at $92.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check OROVY's competition here
PTAUF vs MSLOY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while MSLOY trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check MSLOY's competition here
PTAUF vs OROVF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while OROVF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check OROVF's competition here
PTAUF vs MSLOF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while MSLOF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check MSLOF's competition here
PTAUF vs KAIKY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while KAIKY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check KAIKY's competition here
PTAUF vs KAKKF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check KAKKF's competition here
PTAUF vs SITIY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SITIY trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SITIY's competition here
PTAUF vs SITIF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SITIF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SITIF's competition here
PTAUF vs CMHHF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CMHHF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CMHHF's competition here
PTAUF vs CMHHY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CMHHY's competition here
PTAUF vs QNDPF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while QNDPF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check QNDPF's competition here
PTAUF vs MIHDF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check MIHDF's competition here
PTAUF vs CSDXF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CSDXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CSDXF's competition here
PTAUF vs HAFNF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HAFNF's competition here
PTAUF vs CITAF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CITAF's competition here
PTAUF vs DLPTF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check DLPTF's competition here
PTAUF vs HFIAF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HFIAF's competition here
PTAUF vs CSPKF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CSPKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CSPKF's competition here
PTAUF vs TDGMW Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while TDGMW trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF and TDGMW have similar daily volatility (4.08).Check TDGMW's competition here
PTAUF vs PTAUY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while PTAUY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check PTAUY's competition here
PTAUF vs BWLLY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check BWLLY's competition here
PTAUF vs HOEGF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HOEGF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HOEGF's competition here
PTAUF vs CADLF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CADLF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CADLF's competition here
PTAUF vs BWLLF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check BWLLF's competition here
PTAUF vs HCTPF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HCTPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HCTPF's competition here
PTAUF vs SOIEF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SOIEF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SOIEF's competition here
PTAUF vs PCFBF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while PCFBF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check PCFBF's competition here
PTAUF vs PCFBY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while PCFBY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check PCFBY's competition here
PTAUF vs CKNHF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CKNHF trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CKNHF's competition here
PTAUF vs CITAY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CITAY's competition here
PTAUF vs HHULF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HHULF's competition here
PTAUF vs WTSHF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while WTSHF trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check WTSHF's competition here
PTAUF vs HHULY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HHULY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HHULY's competition here
PTAUF vs IRCUF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while IRCUF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check IRCUF's competition here
PTAUF vs CHDGF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CHDGF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CHDGF's competition here
PTAUF vs DPBSF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 910M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while DPBSF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check DPBSF's competition here
PTAUF vs OKENF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check OKENF's competition here
PTAUF vs MPZZF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 838.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while MPZZF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check MPZZF's competition here
PTAUF vs LTKBF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check LTKBF's competition here
PTAUF vs TJIPF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while TJIPF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check TJIPF's competition here
PTAUF vs SEMUF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SEMUF's competition here
PTAUF vs DMCOF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while DMCOF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check DMCOF's competition here
PTAUF vs AGMJF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while AGMJF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check AGMJF's competition here
PTAUF vs TSMTF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check TSMTF's competition here
PTAUF vs CSPKY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while CSPKY trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check CSPKY's competition here
PTAUF vs PSGFF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check PSGFF's competition here
PTAUF vs TTBKF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 286.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while TTBKF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check TTBKF's competition here
PTAUF vs JMSFF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check JMSFF's competition here
PTAUF vs SLOFF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SLOFF's competition here
PTAUF vs MKOTF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check MKOTF's competition here
PTAUF vs HSPPF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HSPPF's competition here
PTAUF vs VKGLF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check VKGLF's competition here
PTAUF vs BSEAF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while BSEAF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check BSEAF's competition here
PTAUF vs HUPHY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while HUPHY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check HUPHY's competition here
PTAUF vs JNSTF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check JNSTF's competition here
PTAUF vs WSSTF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while WSSTF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check WSSTF's competition here
PTAUF vs AWLNF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check AWLNF's competition here
PTAUF vs GEOUF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check GEOUF's competition here
PTAUF vs ADCUF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check ADCUF's competition here
PTAUF vs ASCJF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check ASCJF's competition here
PTAUF vs GTMAY Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while GTMAY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check GTMAY's competition here
PTAUF vs SEAOF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SEAOF's competition here
PTAUF vs BBLKF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check BBLKF's competition here
PTAUF vs ULTRF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check ULTRF's competition here
PTAUF vs TEUFF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check TEUFF's competition here
PTAUF vs WLOLQ Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check WLOLQ's competition here
PTAUF vs PRGNF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check PRGNF's competition here
PTAUF vs TEUCF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check TEUCF's competition here
PTAUF vs SEPI Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check SEPI's competition here
PTAUF vs ITKSF Comparison July 2025
PTAUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PTAUF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PTAUF is priced at $4.00, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PTAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PTAUF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PTAUF is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTAUF.Check ITKSF's competition here