Principal Solar, Inc.
Principal Solar, Inc. PSWW Peers
See (PSWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSWW | $0.00 | N/A | 317886.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMTGY | $2.37 | +9.22% | 8.22B | -5.27 | -$0.45 | +2.22% |
| XNYIF | $0.33 | N/A | 3.03B | 16.68 | $0.02 | +9.60% |
| XISHY | $6.58 | +0.92% | 2.98B | 21.21 | $0.31 | +9.82% |
| GCPEF | $0.10 | -20.38% | 2.80B | -5.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SMTGF | $22.24 | -58.89% | 771.73M | -5.81 | -$3.83 | +2.44% |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | N/A | 261.05M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +1.26% |
| HYSR | $0.02 | -2.53% | 119.24M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSSXF | $0.03 | N/A | 75.63M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SPRQF | $0.62 | -4.55% | 72.42M | -15.51 | -$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PSWW vs SMTGY Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SMTGY trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SMTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs XNYIF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, XNYIF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while XNYIF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNYIF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XNYIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to XNYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs XISHY Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while XISHY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and XISHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs GCPEF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while GCPEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs SMTGF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 771.73M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SMTGF trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to SMTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs GRMZF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs HYSR Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 119.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while HYSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs CSSXF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to CSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs SPRQF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 72.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SPRQF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SPRQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs UGEIF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and UGEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs CVUEF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 29.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while CVUEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs NEWH Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 25.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while NEWH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs FLDI Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs PXPC Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 12.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while PXPC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs CBUTF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs SEHLF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SEHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs SAENF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SAENF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SAENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs NTCXF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs TSPG Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and TSPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs PTOS Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while PTOS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and PTOS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs AACTF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while AACTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and AACTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs SIRC Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SIRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs QCLSF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 684357.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs ANTGF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578001.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and ANTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs UNSS Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60055.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and UNSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs SPSO Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43283.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SPSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs ABCE Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26052.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and ABCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs OPVS Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24025.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and OPVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs CHJI Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19389.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs SOEN Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18307.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SOEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs NTAC Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 18114.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while NTAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and NTAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs SRWRF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 17875.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SRWRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs SNRS Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16606.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs XDSL Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8498.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and XDSL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs MBCI Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7030.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and MBCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs SUNWQ Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 5678.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and SUNWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs VSOLF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4607.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and VSOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs APVNF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3135.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs PPRW Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3075.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PPRW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and PPRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs GRYG Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3041.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs GSLO Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 1309.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs EDYYF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs EBODF Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs IXEH Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW and IXEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PSWW vs ISUNQ Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 47.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to ISUNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.
PSWW vs KOVR Comparison
PSWW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSWW stands at 317886.00. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44.00. Regarding current trading prices, PSWW is priced at $0.00, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSWW's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSWW is less volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSWW.