PSI Software AG
PSI Software AG (PSSWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PSSWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSSWF | $23.79 | -0.01% | 368.5M | -475.85 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $197.19 | -0.00% | 230.5B | 26.81 | $7.38 | +1.32% |
| INVUP | $24.99 | +0.00% | 46.5B | -1666.00 | -$0.02 | +13.01% |
| CNSWF | $1,728.99 | +0.00% | 38.4B | 55.95 | $32.35 | +0.22% |
| DASTY | $20.53 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 20.18 | $1.06 | +1.38% |
| DASTF | $20.08 | +0.02% | 27.4B | 19.67 | $1.06 | +1.41% |
| DIDIY | $4.45 | +0.45% | 21.6B | -223.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| OBIIF | $32.17 | +0.02% | 14B | 31.53 | $1.02 | +1.56% |
| WIGBY | $31.17 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 56.67 | $0.60 | +0.37% |
| WTCHF | $31.35 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 52.25 | $0.60 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
PSSWF vs SAPGF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 230.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SAPGF trades at $197.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check SAPGF's competition here
PSSWF vs INVUP Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while INVUP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1666.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INVUP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and INVUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INVUP's competition here
PSSWF vs CNSWF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while CNSWF trades at $1,728.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check CNSWF's competition here
PSSWF vs DASTY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while DASTY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check DASTY's competition here
PSSWF vs DASTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while DASTF trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check DASTF's competition here
PSSWF vs DIDIY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while DIDIY trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is -223.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check DIDIY's competition here
PSSWF vs OBIIF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while OBIIF trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and OBIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OBIIF's competition here
PSSWF vs WIGBY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while WIGBY trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check WIGBY's competition here
PSSWF vs WTCHF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while WTCHF trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and WTCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTCHF's competition here
PSSWF vs SGPYY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SGPYY trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check SGPYY's competition here
PSSWF vs SGGEF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SGGEF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and SGGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGGEF's competition here
PSSWF vs NEMTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NEMTF trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NEMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEMTF's competition here
PSSWF vs NEMKY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NEMKY trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check NEMKY's competition here
PSSWF vs XROLF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while XROLF trades at $48.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and XROLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XROLF's competition here
PSSWF vs OCLCF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while OCLCF trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and OCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLCF's competition here
PSSWF vs TMSNY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TMSNY trades at $85.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check TMSNY's competition here
PSSWF vs ALMFF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check ALMFF's competition here
PSSWF vs NCSYF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NCSYF trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NCSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCSYF's competition here
PSSWF vs TMNSF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TMNSF trades at $82.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMNSF's competition here
PSSWF vs FNOXF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and FNOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNOXF's competition here
PSSWF vs THNOF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while THNOF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and THNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THNOF's competition here
PSSWF vs LIFX Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while LIFX trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 190.92. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and LIFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIFX's competition here
PSSWF vs KGDEY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while KGDEY trades at $133.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -1245.95. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check KGDEY's competition here
PSSWF vs SMCYY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMCYY's competition here
PSSWF vs SICRF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SICRF's competition here
PSSWF vs IPEU Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while IPEU trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and IPEU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPEU's competition here
PSSWF vs ASOZY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ASOZY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and ASOZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOZY's competition here
PSSWF vs ASOZF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ASOZF trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and ASOZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOZF's competition here
PSSWF vs KXSCF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while KXSCF trades at $86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 73.48. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check KXSCF's competition here
PSSWF vs BCTCF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BCTCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and BCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCTCF's competition here
PSSWF vs SRBEF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SRBEF trades at $136.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -141.72. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and SRBEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRBEF's competition here
PSSWF vs SWONF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SWONF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -51.26. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and SWONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWONF's competition here
PSSWF vs KHOTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check KHOTF's competition here
PSSWF vs ESKEF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESKEF's competition here
PSSWF vs TMOAY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TMOAY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -101.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TMOAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMOAY's competition here
PSSWF vs VOBIF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while VOBIF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and VOBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOBIF's competition here
PSSWF vs MAGTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAGTF's competition here
PSSWF vs WEMXF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while WEMXF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and WEMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEMXF's competition here
PSSWF vs KNNNF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while KNNNF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and KNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNNNF's competition here
PSSWF vs ABXXF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ABXXF trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -24.84. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check ABXXF's competition here
PSSWF vs TMVWF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TMVWF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TMVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMVWF's competition here
PSSWF vs LTTHF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTTHF's competition here
PSSWF vs ESIGF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check ESIGF's competition here
PSSWF vs TMOAF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 901.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TMOAF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -120.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TMOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMOAF's competition here
PSSWF vs BHPA Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check BHPA's competition here
PSSWF vs TMVWY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 813.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TMVWY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check TMVWY's competition here
PSSWF vs QTGPF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 786.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while QTGPF trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and QTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTGPF's competition here
PSSWF vs PXPHF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while PXPHF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and PXPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXPHF's competition here
PSSWF vs FREKF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 747.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while FREKF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is 126.20. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FREKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and FREKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FREKF's competition here
PSSWF vs SLVFF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check SLVFF's competition here
PSSWF vs EGHSF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 686M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while EGHSF trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check EGHSF's competition here
PSSWF vs BTRCF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 681.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BTRCF trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and BTRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTRCF's competition here
PSSWF vs IRLTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is -110.01. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and IRLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLTF's competition here
PSSWF vs XMMRF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check XMMRF's competition here
PSSWF vs GBGPF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while GBGPF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and GBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBGPF's competition here
PSSWF vs CHNVF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check CHNVF's competition here
PSSWF vs NPACF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NPACF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NPACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPACF's competition here
PSSWF vs RWWI Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while RWWI trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check RWWI's competition here
PSSWF vs NPACY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NPACY trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NPACY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPACY's competition here
PSSWF vs TSVNF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TSVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSVNF's competition here
PSSWF vs NSWEF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSWEF's competition here
PSSWF vs BRDLF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRDLF's competition here
PSSWF vs BVSFF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 448.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BVSFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and BVSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVSFF's competition here
PSSWF vs CRSM Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, CRSM has a market cap of 428.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while CRSM trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas CRSM's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and CRSM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRSM's competition here
PSSWF vs BLKLF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 424.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BLKLF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check BLKLF's competition here
PSSWF vs IQGLF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check IQGLF's competition here
PSSWF vs JAPPF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while JAPPF trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and JAPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAPPF's competition here
PSSWF vs RPGHF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and RPGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPGHF's competition here
PSSWF vs RTME Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and RTME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTME's competition here
PSSWF vs ELMFF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMFF's competition here
PSSWF vs NXLLF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NXLLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NXLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXLLF's competition here
PSSWF vs RLLMF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while RLLMF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and RLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLLMF's competition here
PSSWF vs IVUFF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and IVUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVUFF's competition here
PSSWF vs CIGMF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIGMF's competition here
PSSWF vs LCHTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while LCHTF trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and LCHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCHTF's competition here
PSSWF vs TZROP Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TZROP has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TZROP trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TZROP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TZROP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to TZROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check TZROP's competition here
PSSWF vs EXMXF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXMXF's competition here
PSSWF vs TCYSF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TCYSF trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 69.49. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TCYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCYSF's competition here
PSSWF vs SMTEF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 255.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while SMTEF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check SMTEF's competition here
PSSWF vs PSHPF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while PSHPF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and PSHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSHPF's competition here
PSSWF vs IARGF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while IARGF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and IARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IARGF's competition here
PSSWF vs CMDXF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while CMDXF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check CMDXF's competition here
PSSWF vs DOTDF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while DOTDF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and DOTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DOTDF's competition here
PSSWF vs BAINF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while BAINF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check BAINF's competition here
PSSWF vs EXSPF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while EXSPF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXSPF's competition here
PSSWF vs DAHLF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAHLF's competition here
PSSWF vs PLDIF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while PLDIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and PLDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLDIF's competition here
PSSWF vs FXSRF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXSRF's competition here
PSSWF vs FBSFF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while FBSFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and FBSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBSFF's competition here
PSSWF vs MCAP Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while MCAP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and MCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCAP's competition here
PSSWF vs TCIIF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while TCIIF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and TCIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCIIF's competition here
PSSWF vs LOQPF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while LOQPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check LOQPF's competition here
PSSWF vs NEOJF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while NEOJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and NEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEOJF's competition here
PSSWF vs WONDF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while WONDF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check WONDF's competition here
PSSWF vs CBSZF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check CBSZF's competition here
PSSWF vs WECMF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and WECMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WECMF's competition here
PSSWF vs DLEXY Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, DLEXY has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while DLEXY trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas DLEXY's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DLEXY's ROE of +8.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF and DLEXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLEXY's competition here
PSSWF vs URLOF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, URLOF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while URLOF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas URLOF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to URLOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to URLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check URLOF's competition here
PSSWF vs VCTTF Comparison February 2026
PSSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSSWF stands at 368.5M. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, PSSWF is priced at $23.79, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -475.85, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PSSWF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PSSWF is less volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSSWF.Check VCTTF's competition here