Pason Systems Inc.
Pason Systems Inc. (PSI.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PSI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSI.TO | CA$13.07 | +0.62% | 1B | 19.22 | CA$0.68 | +3.97% |
| CEU.TO | CA$17.67 | +1.03% | 3.7B | 19.21 | CA$0.92 | +1.03% |
| EFX.TO | CA$27.99 | +1.34% | 3.4B | 38.88 | CA$0.72 | +0.57% |
| TVK.TO | CA$130.16 | -2.75% | 2.8B | 30.92 | CA$4.21 | +0.57% |
| TCW.TO | CA$7.36 | +2.36% | 1.5B | 12.91 | CA$0.57 | +2.93% |
| SCL.TO | CA$16.57 | +1.04% | 1.2B | 552.33 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| TOT.TO | CA$21.97 | +2.47% | 800.5M | 11.27 | CA$1.95 | +1.90% |
| CFW.TO | CA$6.69 | +3.40% | 553.4M | 13.94 | CA$0.48 | N/A |
| NOA.TO | CA$18.88 | +1.94% | 548.9M | 16.56 | CA$1.14 | +2.54% |
| MATR.TO | CA$8.94 | +0.00% | 548.5M | 19.43 | CA$0.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PSI.TO vs CEU.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, CEU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while CEU.TO trades at CA$17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas CEU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEU.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to CEU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check CEU.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs EFX.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, EFX.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while EFX.TO trades at CA$27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas EFX.TO's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to EFX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check EFX.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs TVK.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, TVK.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while TVK.TO trades at CA$130.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas TVK.TO's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TVK.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to TVK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check TVK.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs TCW.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, TCW.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while TCW.TO trades at CA$7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas TCW.TO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCW.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to TCW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check TCW.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs SCL.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, SCL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while SCL.TO trades at CA$16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas SCL.TO's P/E ratio is 552.33. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to SCL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check SCL.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs TOT.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, TOT.TO has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while TOT.TO trades at CA$21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas TOT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOT.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to TOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check TOT.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs CFW.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, CFW.TO has a market cap of 553.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while CFW.TO trades at CA$6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas CFW.TO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFW.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to CFW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check CFW.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs NOA.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, NOA.TO has a market cap of 548.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while NOA.TO trades at CA$18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas NOA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOA.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to NOA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check NOA.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs MATR.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, MATR.TO has a market cap of 548.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while MATR.TO trades at CA$8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas MATR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to MATR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check MATR.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs STEP.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, STEP.TO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while STEP.TO trades at CA$5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas STEP.TO's P/E ratio is -49.91. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STEP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to STEP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check STEP.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs PSD.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, PSD.TO has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while PSD.TO trades at CA$4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas PSD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSD.TO's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to PSD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check PSD.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs SHLE.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, SHLE.TO has a market cap of 192.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while SHLE.TO trades at CA$14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas SHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHLE.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to SHLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check SHLE.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs FLNT.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, FLNT.TO has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while FLNT.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas FLNT.TO's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLNT.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to FLNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check FLNT.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs E.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, E.TO has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while E.TO trades at CA$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas E.TO's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to E.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to E.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check E.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs MCB.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, MCB.TO has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while MCB.TO trades at CA$2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas MCB.TO's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCB.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to MCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check MCB.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs ESN.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, ESN.TO has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while ESN.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas ESN.TO's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to ESN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check ESN.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs SFD.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, SFD.TO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while SFD.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas SFD.TO's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFD.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to SFD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check SFD.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs HWO.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, HWO.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while HWO.TO trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas HWO.TO's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to HWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check HWO.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs BRY.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, BRY.TO has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while BRY.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas BRY.TO's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRY.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to BRY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check BRY.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs CSM.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, CSM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while CSM.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas CSM.TO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSM.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is less volatile compared to CSM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check CSM.TO's competition here
PSI.TO vs HE.TO Comparison April 2026
PSI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSI.TO stands at 1B. In comparison, HE.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSI.TO is priced at CA$13.07, while HE.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas HE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, PSI.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HE.TO's ROE of -102.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PSI.TO is more volatile compared to HE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSI.TO.Check HE.TO's competition here