Warrego Energy Limited
Warrego Energy Limited (PRYGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PRYGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRYGF | $0.29 | +0.00% | 357.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.35 | +0.00% | 183.6B | 8.96 | $0.82 | +3.47% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $18.55 | -2.37% | 37.9B | 12.99 | $1.54 | +5.36% |
| IPXHY | $23.86 | +0.97% | 27.8B | 11.06 | $2.16 | +2.45% |
| IPXHF | $20.69 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 8.96 | $2.31 | +3.06% |
| TRMLF | $45.80 | +0.00% | 17.7B | 17.84 | $2.57 | +4.65% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| SSLZY | $5.03 | +0.60% | 16.2B | 19.96 | $0.25 | +4.46% |
| PEXNY | $7.20 | +0.70% | 14.3B | 7.35 | $0.98 | +7.00% |
Stock Comparison
PRYGF vs MEYYY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check MEYYY's competition here
PRYGF vs NSTKF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and NSTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTKF's competition here
PRYGF vs WOPEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while WOPEF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check WOPEF's competition here
PRYGF vs IPXHY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while IPXHY trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check IPXHY's competition here
PRYGF vs IPXHF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while IPXHF trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and IPXHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPXHF's competition here
PRYGF vs TRMLF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while TRMLF trades at $45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check TRMLF's competition here
PRYGF vs DETNF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DETNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and DETNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETNF's competition here
PRYGF vs SSLZY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while SSLZY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check SSLZY's competition here
PRYGF vs PEXNY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PEXNY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PEXNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXNY's competition here
PRYGF vs STOSF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while STOSF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and STOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOSF's competition here
PRYGF vs NOVKY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and NOVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOVKY's competition here
PRYGF vs AETUF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while AETUF trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check AETUF's competition here
PRYGF vs SPGYF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check SPGYF's competition here
PRYGF vs PTRRY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PTRRY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PTRRY's competition here
PRYGF vs DKDRF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DKDRF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and DKDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKDRF's competition here
PRYGF vs VSOGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while VSOGF trades at $59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and VSOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSOGF's competition here
PRYGF vs DELKY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DELKY trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and DELKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELKY's competition here
PRYGF vs DLKGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DLKGF trades at $325.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and DLKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLKGF's competition here
PRYGF vs MEGEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while MEGEF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check MEGEF's competition here
PRYGF vs PREKF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PREKF trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PREKF's competition here
PRYGF vs HBRIY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while HBRIY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check HBRIY's competition here
PRYGF vs PMOIF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PMOIF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PMOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMOIF's competition here
PRYGF vs JPTXF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while JPTXF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and JPTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPTXF's competition here
PRYGF vs PEYUF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PEYUF trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PEYUF's competition here
PRYGF vs ATHOF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ATHOF trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ATHOF's competition here
PRYGF vs OASPW Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and OASPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OASPW's competition here
PRYGF vs PRMRF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PRMRF trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PRMRF's competition here
PRYGF vs NUVSF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while NUVSF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check NUVSF's competition here
PRYGF vs IPCFF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while IPCFF trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 90.20. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and IPCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPCFF's competition here
PRYGF vs BTEGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and BTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEGF's competition here
PRYGF vs EERGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while EERGF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to EERGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check EERGF's competition here
PRYGF vs CDDRF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CDDRF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check CDDRF's competition here
PRYGF vs FRHLF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while FRHLF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check FRHLF's competition here
PRYGF vs UNEGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while UNEGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to UNEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and UNEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNEGF's competition here
PRYGF vs PTGIF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PTGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGIF's competition here
PRYGF vs BCHEY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while BCHEY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and BCHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHEY's competition here
PRYGF vs BEPTF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while BEPTF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is -19.47. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and BEPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEPTF's competition here
PRYGF vs DTNOF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DTNOF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -33.60. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and DTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOF's competition here
PRYGF vs PARXF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PARXF trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PARXF's competition here
PRYGF vs DALXF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DALXF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check DALXF's competition here
PRYGF vs BIREF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while BIREF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check BIREF's competition here
PRYGF vs AAVVF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while AAVVF trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check AAVVF's competition here
PRYGF vs CRLFF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CRLFF trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check CRLFF's competition here
PRYGF vs BWEFF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while BWEFF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and BWEFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWEFF's competition here
PRYGF vs KELTF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while KELTF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and KELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KELTF's competition here
PRYGF vs CRCQW Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check CRCQW's competition here
PRYGF vs WLLAW Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check WLLAW's competition here
PRYGF vs AOIFF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while AOIFF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to AOIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check AOIFF's competition here
PRYGF vs ATUUF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 929.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ATUUF trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUUF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ATUUF's competition here
PRYGF vs KRNGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 890.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while KRNGF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and KRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNGF's competition here
PRYGF vs CWEGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check CWEGF's competition here
PRYGF vs SQZZF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 864.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while SQZZF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to SQZZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and SQZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SQZZF's competition here
PRYGF vs KWTEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 810.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while KWTEF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check KWTEF's competition here
PRYGF vs GUKYF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 637.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while GUKYF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to GUKYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and GUKYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUKYF's competition here
PRYGF vs RCKHF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 607.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while RCKHF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCKHF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and RCKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCKHF's competition here
PRYGF vs FECCF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while FECCF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check FECCF's competition here
PRYGF vs ZPTAF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ZPTAF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ZPTAF's competition here
PRYGF vs AAGEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and AAGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAGEF's competition here
PRYGF vs GFKSY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and GFKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFKSY's competition here
PRYGF vs ZNOG Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 468.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ZNOG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -40.98. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ZNOG's competition here
PRYGF vs SHASF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 460.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while SHASF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check SHASF's competition here
PRYGF vs OILSF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 439.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while OILSF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check OILSF's competition here
PRYGF vs COPJF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while COPJF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and COPJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COPJF's competition here
PRYGF vs TBNRF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and TBNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBNRF's competition here
PRYGF vs EXCE Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while EXCE trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check EXCE's competition here
PRYGF vs BKBEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check BKBEF's competition here
PRYGF vs ENQUF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ENQUF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ENQUF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and ENQUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENQUF's competition here
PRYGF vs PEGIY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PEGIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEGIY's competition here
PRYGF vs KRNGY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while KRNGY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and KRNGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNGY's competition here
PRYGF vs CEIEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -31.13. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and CEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEIEF's competition here
PRYGF vs HZNFF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while HZNFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and HZNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZNFF's competition here
PRYGF vs IPOOF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while IPOOF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPOOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check IPOOF's competition here
PRYGF vs PESAF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PESAF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PESAF's competition here
PRYGF vs PTALF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PTALF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PTALF's competition here
PRYGF vs GASXF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while GASXF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to GASXF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check GASXF's competition here
PRYGF vs CRNCY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CRNCY has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CRNCY trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNCY's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNCY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and CRNCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNCY's competition here
PRYGF vs GEGYY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and GEGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGYY's competition here
PRYGF vs GEGYF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while GEGYF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and GEGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGYF's competition here
PRYGF vs RECAF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, RECAF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while RECAF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECAF's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to RECAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to RECAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check RECAF's competition here
PRYGF vs FOLGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, FOLGF has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while FOLGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOLGF's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to FOLGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to FOLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check FOLGF's competition here
PRYGF vs EEGUF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while EEGUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and EEGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EEGUF's competition here
PRYGF vs ALVOF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ALVOF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ALVOF's competition here
PRYGF vs JRNGF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, JRNGF has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while JRNGF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRNGF's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to JRNGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to JRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check JRNGF's competition here
PRYGF vs PTOAF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PTOAF has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PTOAF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOAF's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTOAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PTOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTOAF's competition here
PRYGF vs ITEEF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ITEEF's competition here
PRYGF vs TUWLF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while TUWLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUWLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and TUWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUWLF's competition here
PRYGF vs NFTN Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, NFTN has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while NFTN trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to NFTN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and NFTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFTN's competition here
PRYGF vs ECAOF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, ECAOF has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while ECAOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECAOF's P/E ratio is -55.39. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECAOF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to ECAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check ECAOF's competition here
PRYGF vs PSHIF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PSHIF's competition here
PRYGF vs CRNZF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while CRNZF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and CRNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNZF's competition here
PRYGF vs HRCXF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and HRCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRCXF's competition here
PRYGF vs RUBLF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while RUBLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check RUBLF's competition here
PRYGF vs PIFYF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PIFYF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PIFYF's competition here
PRYGF vs LNDNF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while LNDNF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and LNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNDNF's competition here
PRYGF vs PTRUF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PTRUF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and PTRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTRUF's competition here
PRYGF vs RECWF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and RECWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RECWF's competition here
PRYGF vs DTNOY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, DTNOY has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while DTNOY trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOY's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTNOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF and DTNOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOY's competition here
PRYGF vs TUWOY Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while TUWOY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUWOY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check TUWOY's competition here
PRYGF vs PTHRF Comparison February 2026
PRYGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRYGF stands at 357.5M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, PRYGF is priced at $0.29, while PTHRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRYGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, PRYGF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRYGF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRYGF.Check PTHRF's competition here