Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ADYYF trades at $1,856.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 53.97. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ADYYF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ADYEY trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 52.31. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ADYEY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while BSQKZ trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check BSQKZ's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check KAKZF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TOITF trades at $139.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 100.84. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TOITF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TMICY trades at $64.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TMICY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TMICF trades at $65.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TMICF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check NEXPF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while NEXXY trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check NEXXY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DRKTY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check GMYTF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SWDAF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while STWRY trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check STWRY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CIOXY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check EXNWF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while OVHFF trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 144.67. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check OVHFF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DRKTF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SPNUF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while WWLNF trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check WWLNF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while WRDLY trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check WRDLY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SANP trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SANP's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while MGPPF trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.67. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check MGPPF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check PHPYF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 896.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while YHEKF trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check YHEKF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CPLFF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 681.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FMZNF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FMZNF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FNCHF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 553.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check PYPTF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 452.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DYNDF trades at $6.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DYNDF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TDCSF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SPMYY trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SPMYY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while NFONF trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check NFONF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CORZQ's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TYPMF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FFPP trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FFPP's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check OTPMF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ABANF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ABANF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SERKF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SERKF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 205.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SEEMF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while HISNF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check HISNF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FSOYF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ERDLF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check GIVXF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CGAAY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check PYFRF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FCLOF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while HAIVF trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check HAIVF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while BGOPF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check BGOPF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DGGXF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DGGXF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while VRSSF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check VRSSF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CROTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CROTF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while JGHG trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check JGHG's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while WHEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check WHEN's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while QBITF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check QBITF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check NTTCF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while NOWVF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check NOWVF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while APGT trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check APGT's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CORZR trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CORZR's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ISDCF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SKKY trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SKKY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SDCH trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SDCH's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TFLM trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TFLM's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while POTTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check POTTF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CLOQ trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CLOQ's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FOBIF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while PLCKF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check PLCKF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CLPMF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CLPMF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check CYBNY's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check QFEEF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check EPXGF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DRKOF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ATCHW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ATCHW's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DLTXF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DSAIF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check IPNFF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SFIIF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while NBVAF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check NBVAF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check DVPNF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while RKNEF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check RKNEF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while VENZF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check VENZF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check OVTZ's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while PKKFF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check PKKFF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check PKLBF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TGCB trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TGCB's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while MODGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check MODGF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while RIHT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check RIHT's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SCYRF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check MBLMF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while VISM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check VISM's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while KCRD trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check KCRD's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while TONR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check TONR's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check RCWDF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 819.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FUAPF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while INOTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check INOTF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while INAR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check INAR's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 728.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while MKTDF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +220.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to MKTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check MKTDF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while ITNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check ITNF's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check FSRDQ's competition here

PRTHU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRTHU stands at 618.5M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PRTHU is priced at $7.55, while SMKG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRTHU currently has a P/E ratio of -18.37, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRTHU's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRTHU is less volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRTHU.Check SMKG's competition here