Prozone Intu Properties Limited
Prozone Intu Properties Limited (PROZONINTU.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PROZONINTU.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROZONINTU.NS | ₹25.85 | -0.19% | 3.9B | 15.67 | ₹1.65 | N/A |
| PHOENIXLTD.NS | ₹1,525.20 | +0.50% | 545.5B | 50.12 | ₹30.43 | +0.16% |
| PHOENIXLTD.BO | ₹1,525.00 | +0.49% | 545.4B | 50.16 | ₹30.40 | +0.16% |
| PRESTIGE.BO | ₹1,152.70 | +0.67% | 496.5B | 51.28 | ₹22.48 | +0.16% |
| PRESTIGE.NS | ₹1,152.00 | +0.62% | 496.2B | 51.34 | ₹22.44 | +0.16% |
| EMBDL.NS | ₹43.50 | +5.00% | 60.5B | -16.93 | -₹2.57 | N/A |
| EMBDL.BO | ₹43.38 | +4.66% | 60.3B | -16.88 | -₹2.57 | N/A |
| HEMIPROP.BO | ₹117.95 | -1.26% | 33.6B | -327.64 | -₹0.36 | N/A |
| HEMIPROP.NS | ₹117.94 | -1.16% | 33.6B | -327.61 | -₹0.36 | N/A |
| UNITECH.NS | ₹4.29 | +13.19% | 11.2B | -0.48 | -₹8.88 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PROZONINTU.NS vs PHOENIXLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PHOENIXLTD.NS has a market cap of 545.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while PHOENIXLTD.NS trades at ₹1,525.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PHOENIXLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 50.12. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHOENIXLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to PHOENIXLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check PHOENIXLTD.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs PHOENIXLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PHOENIXLTD.BO has a market cap of 545.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while PHOENIXLTD.BO trades at ₹1,525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PHOENIXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 50.16. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHOENIXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to PHOENIXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check PHOENIXLTD.BO's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs PRESTIGE.BO Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PRESTIGE.BO has a market cap of 496.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while PRESTIGE.BO trades at ₹1,152.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PRESTIGE.BO's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRESTIGE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to PRESTIGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check PRESTIGE.BO's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs PRESTIGE.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PRESTIGE.NS has a market cap of 496.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while PRESTIGE.NS trades at ₹1,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PRESTIGE.NS's P/E ratio is 51.34. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRESTIGE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to PRESTIGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check PRESTIGE.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs EMBDL.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EMBDL.NS has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while EMBDL.NS trades at ₹43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas EMBDL.NS's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMBDL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to EMBDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check EMBDL.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs EMBDL.BO Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EMBDL.BO has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while EMBDL.BO trades at ₹43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas EMBDL.BO's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMBDL.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to EMBDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check EMBDL.BO's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs HEMIPROP.BO Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HEMIPROP.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while HEMIPROP.BO trades at ₹117.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas HEMIPROP.BO's P/E ratio is -327.64. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEMIPROP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is more volatile compared to HEMIPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check HEMIPROP.BO's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs HEMIPROP.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HEMIPROP.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while HEMIPROP.NS trades at ₹117.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas HEMIPROP.NS's P/E ratio is -327.61. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEMIPROP.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to HEMIPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check HEMIPROP.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs UNITECH.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UNITECH.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while UNITECH.NS trades at ₹4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas UNITECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNITECH.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to UNITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check UNITECH.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs UNITECH.BO Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UNITECH.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while UNITECH.BO trades at ₹4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas UNITECH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNITECH.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to UNITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check UNITECH.BO's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs PROZONER.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PROZONER.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while PROZONER.NS trades at ₹46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PROZONER.NS's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROZONER.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to PROZONER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check PROZONER.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs PROZONER.BO Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PROZONER.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while PROZONER.BO trades at ₹45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PROZONER.BO's P/E ratio is -24.11. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROZONER.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to PROZONER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check PROZONER.BO's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs VIPULLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VIPULLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while VIPULLTD.NS trades at ₹10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas VIPULLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIPULLTD.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is more volatile compared to VIPULLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check VIPULLTD.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs HDIL.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HDIL.NS has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while HDIL.NS trades at ₹1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas HDIL.NS's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDIL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to HDIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check HDIL.NS's competition here
PROZONINTU.NS vs MOTOGENFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
PROZONINTU.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROZONINTU.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MOTOGENFIN.NS has a market cap of 838.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROZONINTU.NS is priced at ₹25.85, while MOTOGENFIN.NS trades at ₹21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROZONINTU.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas MOTOGENFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, PROZONINTU.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOTOGENFIN.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROZONINTU.NS is less volatile compared to MOTOGENFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROZONINTU.NS.Check MOTOGENFIN.NS's competition here