Prosus N.V.
Prosus N.V. PROSF Peers
See (PROSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROSF | $52.69 | +0.06% | 115.2B | 16.62 | $3.17 | +0.21% |
| TCTZF | $64.00 | -1.54% | 582.9B | 22.54 | $2.84 | +0.88% |
| TCEHY | $63.81 | -2.25% | 581.1B | 22.47 | $2.84 | +0.89% |
| PROSY | $10.25 | -0.68% | 115.4B | 16.27 | $0.63 | +0.22% |
| NAPRF | $295.00 | +7.27% | 48.3B | 16.05 | $18.38 | +0.22% |
| NPSNY | $57.75 | -1.28% | 47.3B | 15.69 | $3.68 | +0.16% |
| YAHOF | $4.05 | N/A | 28.9B | 27.00 | $0.15 | +1.15% |
| BAIDF | $10.26 | N/A | 28.8B | 8.14 | $1.26 | N/A |
| KUASF | $6.65 | +5.86% | 28.6B | 13.85 | $0.48 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.29 | N/A | 26.6B | 12.90 | $0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PROSF vs TCTZF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 582.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while TCTZF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs TCEHY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 581.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while TCEHY trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PROSY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while PROSY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NAPRF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while NAPRF trades at $295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NPSNY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while NPSNY trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs YAHOF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while YAHOF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BAIDF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while BAIDF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KUASF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while KUASF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KSHTY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while KSHTY trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RPGRY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RPGRY trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 55.77. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RPGRF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NHNCF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ADEVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ATDRF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ATDRF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ADEVY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ATDRY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ATDRY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CSXXY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while CSXXY trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 52.02. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RTMVY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RTMVY trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RTMVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RTMVF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SKLTF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SKLTF trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 164.63. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CHLLF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while CHLLF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KKKUF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while KKKUF trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs OOOOF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs HMNTY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while HMNTY trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MEIUF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DHGAF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MLRYY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs XINXF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PTOVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, PTOVF has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while PTOVF trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PTOVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTOVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to PTOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ADBMF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs WNWSF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZGXNF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs FRRGF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs VYGPF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MECVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs UUMMF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs OPNDF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs TGRVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NXCLF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CKPDY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CPADF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while CPADF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZMDTF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ZMDTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RSTN Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MSEZ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MSEZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BBUZ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while BBUZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RDLYF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SABOF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SABOF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PXSTF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while PXSTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PRSNF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NIROF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs HYPPF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs EGLXF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BBTVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs GIFX Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while GIFX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SFUNY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BMTM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while BMTM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NUGL Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CRTDW Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs YOOIF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while YOOIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LBUY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs QQQFF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while QQQFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SPFYF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs GOGY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs APMLF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 923.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LTCP Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 839.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MRNJ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MRPT Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 752.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MRPT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs VMSI Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 709K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CYAP Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ILIM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RBDC Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LKST Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 406K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while LKST trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -12.28. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DGTHF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs FMHS Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 267.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while FMHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DATI Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 161.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while DATI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SEEK Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KIWB Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs QTTOY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 64.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while QTTOY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZONX Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs OTTV Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LHGI Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SLNM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs HUTN Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ROII Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs REDFY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RWRDP Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DELCF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BTIM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PIKL Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ISHM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SHGY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MDAW Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LOCM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LOVLQ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZZLL Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs FRFR Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs INTH Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ABBY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RAIO Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 115.2B. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $52.69, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.