Prosus N.V.
Prosus N.V. PROSF Peers
See (PROSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROSF | $55.05 | N/A | 120.3B | 17.36 | $3.17 | +0.20% |
| TCEHY | $64.02 | -0.93% | 582.5B | 22.38 | $2.86 | +0.91% |
| TCTZF | $63.49 | -2.32% | 578.3B | 22.36 | $2.84 | +0.91% |
| PROSY | $10.60 | -1.12% | 119.6B | 16.83 | $0.63 | +0.21% |
| NAPRF | $305.19 | N/A | 50B | 16.59 | $18.40 | +0.22% |
| NPSNY | $58.64 | -1.61% | 48B | 15.93 | $3.68 | +0.16% |
| KUASF | $7.71 | N/A | 33.2B | 16.07 | $0.48 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.47 | +2.48% | 31.8B | 14.66 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $10.60 | +10.88% | 29.7B | 8.41 | $1.26 | N/A |
| YAHOF | $3.70 | N/A | 26.4B | 24.67 | $0.15 | +1.26% |
Stock Comparison
PROSF vs TCEHY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 582.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while TCEHY trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs TCTZF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 578.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while TCTZF trades at $63.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PROSY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while PROSY trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NAPRF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while NAPRF trades at $305.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NPSNY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while NPSNY trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KUASF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while KUASF trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KSHTY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while KSHTY trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BAIDF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while BAIDF trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs YAHOF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while YAHOF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RPGRF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RPGRY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RPGRY trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NHNCF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ADEVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ADEVY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ATDRF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ATDRF trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ATDRY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ATDRY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CSXXY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while CSXXY trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RTMVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RTMVY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RTMVY trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SKLTF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SKLTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KKKUF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while KKKUF trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CHLLF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs OOOOF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MEIUF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs HMNTY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while HMNTY trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DHGAF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MLRYY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs XINXF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ADBMF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs WNWSF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZGXNF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs FRRGF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs VYGPF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MECVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs UUMMF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PXSTF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs OPNDF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs TGRVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NXCLF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CKPDY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RSTN Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZMDTF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ZMDTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CPADF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BBUZ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while BBUZ trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MSEZ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MSEZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RDLYF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SABOF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SABOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PRSNF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NIROF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BMTM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs HYPPF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs EGLXF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BBTVF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs NUGL Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SFUNY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs GIFX Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while GIFX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs YOOIF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while YOOIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CRTDW Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LBUY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MRNJ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs QQQFF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs GOGY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MRPT Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MRPT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs APMLF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 942.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LTCP Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 890.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SPFYF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 636.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs CYAP Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ILIM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs VMSI Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RBDC Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DGTHF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs FMHS Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 267.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while FMHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LKST Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs KIWB Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZONX Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs OTTV Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LHGI Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs QTTOY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while QTTOY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SLNM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs HUTN Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DELCF Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SEEK Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs REDFY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RWRDP Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs DATI Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs BTIM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs PIKL Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ISHM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs SHGY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs MDAW Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LOCM Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ROII Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs LOVLQ Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ZZLL Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs FRFR Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs INTH Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs ABBY Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs RAIO Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.
PROSF vs YITD Comparison
PROSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROSF stands at 120.3B. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, PROSF is priced at $55.05, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROSF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.36, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROSF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROSF is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROSF.