Productivity Technologies Corp.
Productivity Technologies Corp. PRAC Peers
See (PRAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRAC | $0.04 | -22.22% | 96.2K | 0.58 | $0.06 | +644.44% |
| SMAWF | $252.00 | -0.03% | 197.8B | 22.36 | $11.27 | +2.16% |
| SIEGY | $125.55 | +0.07% | 196.7B | 22.34 | $5.62 | +1.84% |
| SBGSY | $51.04 | -2.02% | 143.4B | 28.36 | $1.80 | +1.64% |
| SBGSF | $252.96 | -3.34% | 141.9B | 28.14 | $8.99 | +1.27% |
| ATLFF | $17.00 | +14.48% | 89.9B | 27.42 | $0.62 | +1.67% |
| SMNEY | $97.97 | +2.96% | 80.1B | 408.21 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $99.00 | +5.88% | 78.8B | 412.50 | $0.24 | N/A |
| MHVYF | $22.75 | -0.57% | 76.4B | 45.50 | $0.50 | +0.65% |
| ATLKY | $16.30 | -1.27% | 76.4B | 26.29 | $0.62 | +1.77% |
Stock Comparison
PRAC vs SMAWF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMAWF trades at $252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SIEGY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SIEGY trades at $125.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SBGSY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SBGSY trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SBGSF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SBGSF trades at $252.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ATLFF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ATLFF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and ATLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SMNEY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMNEY trades at $97.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 408.21. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SMEGF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMEGF trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 412.50. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs MHVYF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while MHVYF trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ATLKY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ATLKY trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ATLCY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ATLCY trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ATLPF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ATLPF trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and ATLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs KNYJY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KNYJY trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs WRTBY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WRTBY trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SHLRF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SHLRF trades at $352.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SHLAF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SHLAF trades at $348.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and SHLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs KNYJF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KNYJF trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs WEGZY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WEGZY trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SDVKY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SDVKY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SDVKF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SDVKF trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs FANUY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FANUY trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs FANUF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FANUF trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and FANUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SMCAY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMCAY trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SMECF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMECF trades at $375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs NJDCY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while NJDCY trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs NNDNF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while NNDNF trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and NNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs WEICF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WEICF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ALFVY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ALFVY trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs VWSYF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while VWSYF trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs VWDRY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while VWDRY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ALFVF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs IHICY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while IHICY trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs WEICY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SIELF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SIELF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs WRTBF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WRTBF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and WRTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs GCTAF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs GCTAY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs VACNY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while VACNY trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs KWHIY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KWHIY trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs GEAGF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while GEAGF trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs RATIY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs IHICF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while IHICF trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs VTTGF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SMGZY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMGZY trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs KWHIF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KWHIF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs DAIUF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while DAIUF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs RTLLF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while RTLLF trades at $828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs DFKCY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while DFKCY trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs WEGRY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WEGRY trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and WEGRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs TBABF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs MLSPF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while MLSPF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -136.82. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs WEIGF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while WEIGF trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and WEIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SMGKF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs EBCOY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while EBCOY trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs JPSWY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while JPSWY trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and JPSWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs IMIAF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while IMIAF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs YOKEF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while YOKEF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and YOKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SULZF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SULZF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and SULZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs YOKEY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while YOKEY trades at $48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs FCHRF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs HSHZY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while HSHZY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and HSHZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs VLMTY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and VLMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SPXSY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SPXSY trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SPXSF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SPXSF trades at $77.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs EBCOF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs BCHHF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while BCHHF trades at $505.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs HAIIF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs XJNGF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while XJNGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and XJNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs DNGFF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs NRXXY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while NRXXY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 148.29. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs NRDXF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while NRDXF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 131.93. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs HSHIF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs FLUIF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FLUIF trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs YMATF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while YMATF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs VOYJF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs SFSLF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs KRNNF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs ATSAF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs NGKIF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while NGKIF trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs AALBF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while AALBF trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs JGHAF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while JGHAF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and JGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs RTOXF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while RTOXF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs MRRLF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs MICLF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs CYJBF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs KUKAF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs THKLY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while THKLY trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 55.12. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs FJTCY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FJTCY trades at $38.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs AMDWF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while AMDWF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs FLIDF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SOHVF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and SOHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs FLIDY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while FLIDY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs THKLF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs SOHVY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while SOHVY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 516.00. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs MIURF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and MIURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs JGHHY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and JGHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs NCTKY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while NCTKY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and NCTKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs KRDXF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while KRDXF trades at $281.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC is less volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRAC.
PRAC vs MLSYY Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and MLSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PRAC vs IRRHF Comparison
PRAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRAC stands at 96.2K. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRAC is priced at $0.04, while IRRHF trades at $2,389.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRAC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.58, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, PRAC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRAC and IRRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).