Proton Motor Power Systems Plc
Proton Motor Power Systems Plc PPS.L Peers
See (PPS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPS.L | $0.15 | -14.29% | 2.91M | -0.15 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| 0NX2.L | $27.51 | -0.48% | 58.65B | 12.23 | $2.25 | +1.58% |
| 0HF7.L | $182.16 | -0.05% | 42.06B | 40.66 | $4.48 | +0.63% |
| 0L2T.L | $27.20 | +0.74% | 8.18B | N/A | N/A | +0.44% |
| 0RQH.L | $43.55 | +1.52% | 7.68B | 15.61 | $2.79 | +3.27% |
| 0G9R.L | $165.20 | N/A | 1.46B | -103.64 | -$1.59 | N/A |
| SMS.L | $954.00 | +0.21% | 1.32B | 86.73 | $0.11 | +0.87% |
| 0REY.L | $159.98 | N/A | 990.00M | 43.93 | $3.64 | N/A |
| 0R1J.L | $18.11 | N/A | 832.91M | -18.71 | -$0.97 | N/A |
| VLX.L | $268.50 | -0.19% | 493.55M | 14.92 | $0.18 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
PPS.L vs 0NX2.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0NX2.L has a market cap of 58.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0NX2.L trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0NX2.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0NX2.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0NX2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0HF7.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0HF7.L has a market cap of 42.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0HF7.L trades at $182.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0HF7.L's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HF7.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0HF7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0L2T.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0L2T.L has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0L2T.L trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0L2T.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0L2T.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0L2T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0RQH.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0RQH.L has a market cap of 7.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0RQH.L trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0RQH.L's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0RQH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0RQH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0G9R.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0G9R.L has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0G9R.L trades at $165.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0G9R.L's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0G9R.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0G9R.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs SMS.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, SMS.L has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while SMS.L trades at $954.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SMS.L's P/E ratio is 86.73. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to SMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0REY.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0REY.L has a market cap of 990.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0REY.L trades at $159.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0REY.L's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0REY.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0REY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0R1J.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0R1J.L has a market cap of 832.91M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0R1J.L trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0R1J.L's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R1J.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0R1J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs VLX.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, VLX.L has a market cap of 493.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while VLX.L trades at $268.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VLX.L's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to VLX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs TFW.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, TFW.L has a market cap of 337.96M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while TFW.L trades at $290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TFW.L's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFW.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to TFW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0QJY.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0QJY.L has a market cap of 314.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0QJY.L trades at $498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0QJY.L's P/E ratio is -185.34. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QJY.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0QJY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0QPV.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0QPV.L has a market cap of 294.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0QPV.L trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0QPV.L's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QPV.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0QPV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs LUCE.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, LUCE.L has a market cap of 228.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while LUCE.L trades at $148.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LUCE.L's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUCE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to LUCE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs XPP.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, XPP.L has a market cap of 218.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while XPP.L trades at $783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas XPP.L's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to XPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0MJH.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0MJH.L has a market cap of 211.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0MJH.L trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0MJH.L's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0MJH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0MJH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0QP6.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0QP6.L has a market cap of 210.94M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0QP6.L trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0QP6.L's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QP6.L's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0QP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs SUP.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, SUP.L has a market cap of 187.70M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while SUP.L trades at $160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SUP.L's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUP.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to SUP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0A60.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0A60.L has a market cap of 164.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0A60.L trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0A60.L's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0A60.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0A60.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0QL5.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0QL5.L has a market cap of 160.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0QL5.L trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0QL5.L's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0QL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs CWR.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, CWR.L has a market cap of 140.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while CWR.L trades at $72.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CWR.L's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWR.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to CWR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs AFC.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, AFC.L has a market cap of 90.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while AFC.L trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AFC.L's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFC.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to AFC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0O27.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0O27.L has a market cap of 62.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0O27.L trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0O27.L's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0O27.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0O27.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs DWHA.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, DWHA.L has a market cap of 58.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while DWHA.L trades at $575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DWHA.L's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DWHA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to DWHA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs DWHT.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, DWHT.L has a market cap of 58.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while DWHT.L trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DWHT.L's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DWHT.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to DWHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs IKA.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, IKA.L has a market cap of 55.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while IKA.L trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas IKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IKA.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to IKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs 0GYQ.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, 0GYQ.L has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while 0GYQ.L trades at $75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas 0GYQ.L's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0GYQ.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to 0GYQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs DIA.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, DIA.L has a market cap of 44.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while DIA.L trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DIA.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIA.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to DIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs GELN.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, GELN.L has a market cap of 21.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while GELN.L trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GELN.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GELN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to GELN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs EAAS.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, EAAS.L has a market cap of 20.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while EAAS.L trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas EAAS.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EAAS.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to EAAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs LPA.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, LPA.L has a market cap of 6.94M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while LPA.L trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LPA.L's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to LPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs DGI.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, DGI.L has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while DGI.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DGI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to DGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.
PPS.L vs AMTE.L Comparison
PPS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPS.L stands at 2.91M. In comparison, AMTE.L has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PPS.L is priced at $0.15, while AMTE.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AMTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PPS.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMTE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPS.L is more volatile compared to AMTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPS.L.