Pure to Pure Beauty Inc.

PPB.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PPB.CN stands at 16.5M. In comparison, KPT.TO has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPB.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while KPT.TO trades at CA$9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PPB.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas KPT.TO's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, PPB.CN's ROE is -1.32%, compared to KPT.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPB.CN is more volatile compared to KPT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPB.CN.Check KPT.TO's competition here

PPB.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PPB.CN stands at 16.5M. In comparison, CGII.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPB.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CGII.CN trades at CA$0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PPB.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas CGII.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, PPB.CN's ROE is -1.32%, compared to CGII.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PPB.CN is less volatile compared to CGII.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPB.CN.Check CGII.CN's competition here

PPB.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PPB.CN stands at 16.5M. In comparison, ZRO.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPB.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while ZRO.CN trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PPB.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas ZRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, PPB.CN's ROE is -1.32%, compared to ZRO.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PPB.CN is more volatile compared to ZRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPB.CN.Check ZRO.CN's competition here

PPB.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PPB.CN stands at 16.5M. In comparison, MAV.TO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPB.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while MAV.TO trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PPB.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas MAV.TO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PPB.CN's ROE is -1.32%, compared to MAV.TO's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PPB.CN is more volatile compared to MAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPB.CN.Check MAV.TO's competition here

PPB.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PPB.CN stands at 16.5M. In comparison, WAY.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPB.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while WAY.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PPB.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas WAY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPB.CN's ROE is -1.32%, compared to WAY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPB.CN is more volatile compared to WAY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPB.CN.Check WAY.CN's competition here

PPB.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PPB.CN stands at 16.5M. In comparison, AHC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPB.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AHC.TO trades at CA$4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PPB.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas AHC.TO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, PPB.CN's ROE is -1.32%, compared to AHC.TO's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PPB.CN is more volatile compared to AHC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPB.CN.Check AHC.TO's competition here