PotNetwork Holdings, Inc.
PotNetwork Holdings, Inc. POTN Peers
See (POTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POTN | $0.00 | N/A | 91K | -0.01 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| MKGAF | $132.58 | +0.00% | 57.6B | 18.06 | $7.34 | +1.66% |
| MKKGY | $25.99 | +0.23% | 56.3B | 17.68 | $1.47 | +2.19% |
| HLNCF | $5.57 | -2.54% | 50.2B | 26.50 | $0.21 | +1.95% |
| TKPHF | $26.30 | N/A | 41.4B | 55.96 | $0.47 | +5.06% |
| IPSEY | $29.20 | N/A | 38.6B | 24.13 | $1.21 | +1.06% |
| TEVJF | $19.31 | N/A | 22.1B | -16.79 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| SDZNY | $49.28 | -0.20% | 21.2B | -2464.00 | -$0.02 | +1.37% |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| SGIOY | $8.11 | +0.01% | 13.8B | 11.59 | $0.70 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
POTN vs MKGAF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while MKGAF trades at $132.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs MKKGY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while MKKGY trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HLNCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HLNCF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs TKPHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TKPHF trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs IPSEY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while IPSEY trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs TEVJF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TEVJF trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -16.79. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SDZNY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SDZNY trades at $49.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2464.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ESALY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SGIOY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SGIOY trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SGIOF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SGIOF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and SGIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs BIOVF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while BIOVF trades at $30.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs IPSEF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while IPSEF trades at $125.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SFOSF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SFOSF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ESALF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ESALF trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ESAIY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ESAIY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs GZPHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while GZPHF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and GZPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs HKMPY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HKMPY trades at $56.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HKMPF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HKMPF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs APNHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while APNHF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs WIBFF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HLBBF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HLBBF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs LVZPF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HLUBF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HLUBF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs INVVY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and INVVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs APNHY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while APNHY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and APNHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs IZQVF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and IZQVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs HMDCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HYPMY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HYPMY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs DNPUF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while DNPUF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ULIHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ULIHF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs THCBF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HTSUF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HTSUF trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CHSYF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CHSYF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and CHSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs TSMRF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TSMRF trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and TSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs DMPHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and DMPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs LJUIF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and LJUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs LBTSF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LBTSF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 150.17. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CHIZF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CHIZF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and CHIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs SHEZF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs YIHCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and YIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs SMDPY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SMDPY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and SMDPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs NPPNY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while NPPNY trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs NPNKF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while NPNKF trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs KARBF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and KARBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs EVOTF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while EVOTF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ARSUF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ARSUF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs GTBIF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while GTBIF trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SWGHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and SWGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs GNMLF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while GNMLF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and GNMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs KKPCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while KKPCF trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs KSPHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 994.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while KSPHF trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CASBF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 982.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CASBF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SHPHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs BIOGY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 914.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while BIOGY trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs LVTTF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 885.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs EVRRF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 881.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and EVRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs NRXCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and NRXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs TWAPF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and TWAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs CSWYF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CSWYF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs TCNNF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 800.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TCNNF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs TRXPF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and TRXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs SWDCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SWDCF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs NIKA Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 672.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while NIKA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CURLF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 649M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CURLF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs TRSSF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ELTP Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 566.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ELTP trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CCHWF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs SGFEF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while SGFEF trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs AIHLF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while AIHLF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs BOIRF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while BOIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs PEXXF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and PEXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs MITPF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 451.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while MITPF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and MITPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs CNGGF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CNGGF has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CNGGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNGGF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CNGGF's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs KHTRF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while KHTRF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs AGYTF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs GLASF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while GLASF trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -64.78. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs PKBFF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs BHCCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs VRNOF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while VRNOF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CPHRF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CPHRF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CRLBF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CRLBF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs PLNHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs HUMDF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HUMDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and HUMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs COPHF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs STMH Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while STMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs PHCUF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while PHCUF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is 432.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs LPCUF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and LPCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs CNVCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and CNVCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs HLTRF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while HLTRF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs BIOYF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while BIOYF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs ABSCF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while ABSCF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs GRUSF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while GRUSF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs GBLP Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, GBLP has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while GBLP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GBLP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to GBLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to GBLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs LOVFF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LOVFF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs LRDSF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs CBWTF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while CBWTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs PLNH Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while PLNH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.
POTN vs EOFBY Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POTN and EOFBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
POTN vs MEDXF Comparison
POTN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POTN stands at 91K. In comparison, MEDXF has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POTN is priced at $0.00, while MEDXF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POTN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MEDXF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, POTN's ROE is +2.58%, compared to MEDXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POTN is less volatile compared to MEDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POTN.