POSaBIT Systems Corporation
POSaBIT Systems Corporation POSAF Peers
See (POSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POSAF | $0.06 | -6.71% | 9.3M | -1.48 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $25.76 | +14.91% | 45.8B | 33.03 | $0.78 | +0.74% |
| FJTSY | $23.45 | +0.60% | 41.7B | 30.06 | $0.78 | N/A |
| NTDTY | $28.10 | +1.30% | 39.4B | 39.57 | $0.71 | N/A |
| NIPNF | $27.52 | N/A | 36.7B | 29.92 | $0.92 | +0.68% |
| NTTDF | $24.82 | N/A | 34.8B | 34.96 | $0.71 | +0.36% |
| CAPMF | $171.79 | +0.88% | 29.2B | 16.15 | $10.64 | +2.25% |
| CGEMY | $34.28 | +2.15% | 29.1B | 15.94 | $2.15 | +2.18% |
| NURAF | $41.48 | +4.72% | 23.7B | 36.71 | $1.13 | +1.04% |
| NRILY | $39.55 | -0.50% | 22.6B | 35.00 | $1.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
POSAF vs FJTSF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while FJTSF trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FJTSY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while FJTSY trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NTDTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NTDTY trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NIPNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NIPNF trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NTTDF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NTTDF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CAPMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CAPMF trades at $171.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CGEMY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CGEMY trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NURAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NURAF trades at $41.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NRILY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NRILY trades at $39.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs WIZEY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while WIZEY trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs WPLCF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while WPLCF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TISNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while TISNF trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ISMAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ISMAF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DTATF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs RPYTF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DUSXF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BECTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while BECTY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BHTLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SPSAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SPSAF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TSYHY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while TSYHY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TSYHF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while TSYHF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ISMAY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ISMAY trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CTLPP Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CTLPP trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1500.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NWITY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NWKLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NSSXF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SLNTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NTCYF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CFTLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NDTAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NDTAF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -11.95. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs AEXAY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while AEXAY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 387.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NCRRP Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ATEAY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ATEAY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DLGEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DLGEF trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs HLTEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ATAZF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CCCMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CRAYF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DTSOF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SESPF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KSUEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KAHTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NGRRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 864.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NGRRF trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ADSGF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CTSDF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs AEXAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 799.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while AEXAF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TRCLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FDRVF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DCHIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FDDMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs GBDMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CMTUF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DTTLY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 406.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DTTLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CEJOF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SLUNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SVPLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs EMCHF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while EMCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CSYJF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CSYJF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SSCC Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CSYJY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ITFRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs APMRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs APPEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 201.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while APPEF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs APXYY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while APXYY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ALVNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FCCN Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while FCCN trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ULPRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ALYAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while ALYAF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs QUISF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CNGFF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs GSDT Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while GSDT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DCHIY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DCHIY trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs QSCGF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs HLEO Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while HLEO trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KDCXF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs EAXR Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CXGEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SEBFF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SNELF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SPOFF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SPOFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs MLBEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while MLBEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BNXAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while BNXAF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KTHGF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs WYLDF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs XTMIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DRGV Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs VSSSF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while VSSSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DVRNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KNRLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DCSX Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BRQSF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while BRQSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FUUN Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CPIHF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SKTCF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CRCW Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SEAV Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SEAV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SFWJ Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SFWJ has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SFWJ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SFWJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SFWJ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SFWJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SNOIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NOSUF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.06, while NOSUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.48, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.