POSaBIT Systems Corporation
POSaBIT Systems Corporation POSAF Peers
See (POSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POSAF | $0.05 | +12.63% | 8.16M | -1.30 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| FJTSY | $22.28 | -3.05% | 39.85B | 28.20 | $0.79 | N/A |
| NTTDF | $27.40 | N/A | 38.42B | 37.53 | $0.73 | +0.32% |
| FJTSF | $21.11 | -6.39% | 37.52B | 26.72 | $0.79 | +0.90% |
| NTDTY | $26.10 | -2.98% | 36.60B | 35.76 | $0.73 | N/A |
| NIPNF | $25.13 | +4.64% | 33.48B | 27.61 | $0.91 | +0.74% |
| CGEMY | $34.92 | -0.20% | 29.69B | 16.32 | $2.14 | +2.10% |
| CAPMF | $171.06 | -0.49% | 29.07B | 15.96 | $10.72 | +2.13% |
| NRILY | $40.60 | +2.50% | 23.41B | 35.61 | $1.14 | N/A |
| NURAF | $37.36 | -6.21% | 21.38B | 32.78 | $1.14 | +1.15% |
Stock Comparison
POSAF vs FJTSY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 39.85B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while FJTSY trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NTTDF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 38.42B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NTTDF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FJTSF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 37.52B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while FJTSF trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NTDTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 36.60B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NTDTY trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NIPNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 33.48B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NIPNF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CGEMY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 29.69B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CGEMY trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CAPMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 29.07B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CAPMF trades at $171.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NRILY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 23.41B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NRILY trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NURAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 21.38B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NURAF trades at $37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 32.78. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs WIZEY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.64B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while WIZEY trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs WPLCF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while WPLCF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TISNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while TISNF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DTATF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ISMAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ISMAF trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs RPYTF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BECTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while BECTY trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BHTLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TSYHF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while TSYHF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TSYHY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while TSYHY trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SPSAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SPSAF trades at $206.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CTLPP Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ISMAY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ISMAY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NWITY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NWKLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NSSXF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs AEXAY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while AEXAY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SLNTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NTCYF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CFTLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NDTAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NCRRP Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ATEAY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ATEAY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs HLTEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ATAZF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DUSXF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DLGEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CCCMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NGRRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NGRRF trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CRAYF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DTSOF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 967.10M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SESPF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KSUEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KAHTY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ADSGF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CTSDF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.12M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TRCLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs AEXAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 762.20M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while AEXAF trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FDRVF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 732.80M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DCHIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FDDMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs GBDMF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CMTUF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CEJOF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388.05M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DTTLY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SLUNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SVPLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ITFRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 276.56M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ITFRF trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CSYJF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 261.38M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SSCC Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CSYJY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs TSSI Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 226.94M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while TSSI trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs EMCHF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs APMRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FCCN Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 182.79M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while FCCN trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs APXYY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 169.17M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while APXYY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ALVNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs APPEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 149.28M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while APPEF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ULPRF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs ALYAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 128.10M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while ALYAF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs QUISF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CNGFF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs QSCGF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs GSDT Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 93.62M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while GSDT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DCHIY Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.40M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KDCXF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs EAXR Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs HLEO Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while HLEO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CXGEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SEBFF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SNELF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BNXAF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 24.54M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while BNXAF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs MLBEF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 23.83M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SPOFF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 18.00M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SPOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KTHGF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs XTMIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 9.37M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DRGV Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.37M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs KNRLF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.12M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DVRNF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 5.96M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs FUUN Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs BRQSF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.31M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while BRQSF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs DCSX Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.19M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while DCSX trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CPIHF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs VSSSF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SKTCF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs NOSUF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while NOSUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs CRCW Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.20M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs SNOIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs MOBIF Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.
POSAF vs GTCH Comparison
POSAF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POSAF stands at 8.16M. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, POSAF is priced at $0.05, while GTCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POSAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POSAF's ROE is -2.43%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POSAF is more volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSAF.