Porsche Automobil Holding SE
Porsche Automobil Holding SE (POAHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (POAHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POAHF | $43.06 | -0.78% | 13.2B | -0.52 | -$82.38 | +5.06% |
| GELYY | $50.79 | +1.60% | 515B | 12.18 | $4.17 | +1.65% |
| TOYOF | $24.30 | +0.01% | 311B | 12.83 | $1.86 | +2.67% |
| BYDDF | $12.54 | +0.02% | 117.3B | 62.22 | $0.20 | +1.48% |
| BYDDY | $12.49 | +0.00% | 111.9B | 62.10 | $0.20 | +1.48% |
| MBGAF | $69.18 | +0.01% | 67.2B | 9.07 | $7.69 | +6.98% |
| MBGYY | $17.15 | -0.06% | 67B | 9.06 | $1.92 | +6.87% |
| BYMOF | $102.02 | +0.00% | 63.5B | 7.58 | $13.46 | +4.96% |
| BAMXF | $101.15 | +0.00% | 63.2B | 7.62 | $13.50 | +4.67% |
| VWAGY | $12.01 | +0.00% | 60.7B | 7.61 | $1.59 | +5.90% |
Stock Comparison
POAHF vs GELYY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 515B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GELYY trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check GELYY's competition here
POAHF vs TOYOF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 311B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while TOYOF trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check TOYOF's competition here
POAHF vs BYDDF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BYDDF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 62.22. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check BYDDF's competition here
POAHF vs BYDDY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BYDDY trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 62.10. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check BYDDY's competition here
POAHF vs MBGAF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while MBGAF trades at $69.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check MBGAF's competition here
POAHF vs MBGYY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while MBGYY trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check MBGYY's competition here
POAHF vs BYMOF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BYMOF trades at $102.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check BYMOF's competition here
POAHF vs BAMXF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BAMXF trades at $101.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and BAMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMXF's competition here
POAHF vs VWAGY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while VWAGY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check VWAGY's competition here
POAHF vs VWAPY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while VWAPY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check VWAPY's competition here
POAHF vs VLKAF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while VLKAF trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check VLKAF's competition here
POAHF vs VLKPF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while VLKPF trades at $120.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check VLKPF's competition here
POAHF vs MAHMF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while MAHMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and MAHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAHMF's competition here
POAHF vs DRPRY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while DRPRY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check DRPRY's competition here
POAHF vs DRPRF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while DRPRF trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and DRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRPRF's competition here
POAHF vs HNDAF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while HNDAF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check HNDAF's competition here
POAHF vs HYMTF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check HYMTF's competition here
POAHF vs TYIDY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while TYIDY trades at $129.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check TYIDY's competition here
POAHF vs TYIDF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while TYIDF trades at $125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and TYIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYIDF's competition here
POAHF vs SZKMF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while SZKMF trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check SZKMF's competition here
POAHF vs SZKMY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while SZKMY trades at $61.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check SZKMY's competition here
POAHF vs GELHY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GELHY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GELHY trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GELHY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GELHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to GELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check GELHY's competition here
POAHF vs GELYF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GELYF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check GELYF's competition here
POAHF vs HYMLF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and HYMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYMLF's competition here
POAHF vs GWLLF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GWLLF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and GWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLF's competition here
POAHF vs BMWYY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check BMWYY's competition here
POAHF vs XPNGF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while XPNGF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and XPNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XPNGF's competition here
POAHF vs EXXRF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while EXXRF trades at $85.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check EXXRF's competition here
POAHF vs FUJHF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while FUJHF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and FUJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUJHF's competition here
POAHF vs FUJHY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while FUJHY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check FUJHY's competition here
POAHF vs GWLLY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GWLLY trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and GWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLY's competition here
POAHF vs POAHY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while POAHY trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check POAHY's competition here
POAHF vs YAMHY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check YAMHY's competition here
POAHF vs ISUZY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ISUZY trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check ISUZY's competition here
POAHF vs DNFGF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while DNFGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and DNFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGF's competition here
POAHF vs RNLSY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while RNLSY trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check RNLSY's competition here
POAHF vs GNZUF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GNZUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and GNZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNZUF's competition here
POAHF vs RNSDF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while RNSDF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and RNSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNSDF's competition here
POAHF vs JCYCF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while JCYCF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and JCYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYCF's competition here
POAHF vs NIOIF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NIOIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -11.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and NIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIOIF's competition here
POAHF vs ISUZF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ISUZF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and ISUZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISUZF's competition here
POAHF vs JCYGY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while JCYGY trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and JCYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYGY's competition here
POAHF vs NSANF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NSANF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check NSANF's competition here
POAHF vs NSANY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NSANY trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check NSANY's competition here
POAHF vs DNFGY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while DNFGY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is -113.28. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and DNFGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGY's competition here
POAHF vs VLVCY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while VLVCY trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 570.60. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and VLVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVCY's competition here
POAHF vs VLVOF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while VLVOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and VLVOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVOF's competition here
POAHF vs YMHAY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while YMHAY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check YMHAY's competition here
POAHF vs YAMHF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while YAMHF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and YAMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMHF's competition here
POAHF vs IVCGF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while IVCGF trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and IVCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVCGF's competition here
POAHF vs MZDAY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while MZDAY trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check MZDAY's competition here
POAHF vs MZDAF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while MZDAF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and MZDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MZDAF's competition here
POAHF vs MMTOF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while MMTOF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and MMTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMTOF's competition here
POAHF vs YADGF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while YADGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and YADGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YADGF's competition here
POAHF vs SMEBF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while SMEBF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and SMEBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMEBF's competition here
POAHF vs BCAUF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BCAUF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check BCAUF's competition here
POAHF vs BMCLF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and BMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMCLF's competition here
POAHF vs BCCMY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BCCMY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is -18.08. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and BCCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCMY's competition here
POAHF vs HINOY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while HINOY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HINOY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and HINOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOY's competition here
POAHF vs NFYEF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NFYEF trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check NFYEF's competition here
POAHF vs HINOF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while HINOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HINOF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and HINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOF's competition here
POAHF vs FOVSY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 936.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while FOVSY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and FOVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOVSY's competition here
POAHF vs NSNHF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NSNHF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and NSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSNHF's competition here
POAHF vs ELMWQ Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and ELMWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMWQ's competition here
POAHF vs AMGDF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 833.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while AMGDF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check AMGDF's competition here
POAHF vs ARGGY Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 789.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ARGGY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check ARGGY's competition here
POAHF vs PIAGF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while PIAGF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and PIAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIAGF's competition here
POAHF vs KRSOF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and KRSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRSOF's competition here
POAHF vs NRDE Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NRDE trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check NRDE's competition here
POAHF vs RIDEQ Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check RIDEQ's competition here
POAHF vs FHYDF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while FHYDF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check FHYDF's competition here
POAHF vs LFEV Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while LFEV trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check LFEV's competition here
POAHF vs ELMSQ Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ELMSQ trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check ELMSQ's competition here
POAHF vs SEVCF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while SEVCF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check SEVCF's competition here
POAHF vs CSBI Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while CSBI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and CSBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSBI's competition here
POAHF vs EVTGF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check EVTGF's competition here
POAHF vs FSRNQ Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check FSRNQ's competition here
POAHF vs RONN Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 794.5K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RONN's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and RONN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RONN's competition here
POAHF vs ELCR Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check ELCR's competition here
POAHF vs TUGAF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 495.9K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and TUGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUGAF's competition here
POAHF vs GKIT Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 494.9K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GKIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and GKIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GKIT's competition here
POAHF vs ELEK Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 405.8K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and ELEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEK's competition here
POAHF vs BINI Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BINI has a market cap of 293.5K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while BINI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BINI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BINI's ROE of +5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to BINI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check BINI's competition here
POAHF vs GACR Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and GACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GACR's competition here
POAHF vs EGOXF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EGOXF has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while EGOXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas EGOXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to EGOXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and EGOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGOXF's competition here
POAHF vs ELIO Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and ELIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIO's competition here
POAHF vs ARVLF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and ARVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARVLF's competition here
POAHF vs NDVR Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF and NDVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVR's competition here
POAHF vs NVYAF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 869. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check NVYAF's competition here
POAHF vs DDAIF Comparison February 2026
POAHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POAHF stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POAHF is priced at $43.06, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POAHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, POAHF's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POAHF is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POAHF.Check DDAIF's competition here