Pineapple Power Corporation plc
Pineapple Power Corporation plc (PNPL.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PNPL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNPL.L | £2.74 | -5.52% | 2.3M | -2.74 | -£0.01 | N/A |
0R3I.L | £100.05 | +0.41% | 11.3B | -20.66 | -£4.84 | N/A |
DRX.L | £682.50 | -3.53% | 2.4B | 6.32 | £1.08 | +3.23% |
0QOH.L | £32.60 | -1.81% | 1.1B | 14.57 | £2.24 | N/A |
GRP.L | £0.77 | +0.79% | 857.3M | 15.40 | £0.05 | +7.81% |
0E9V.L | £48.02 | -3.32% | 688.1M | 19.62 | £2.52 | +1.04% |
0EIB.L | £1.06 | +0.00% | 464M | 211.20 | £0.01 | +4.69% |
0GHX.L | £4.30 | +0.00% | 171.6M | -1.60 | -£2.69 | N/A |
IES.L | £21.75 | +4.82% | 95.8M | -3.11 | -£0.07 | N/A |
GOOD.L | £489.00 | +0.00% | 90.5M | 19.56 | £0.25 | +0.22% |
Stock Comparison
PNPL.L vs 0R3I.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0R3I.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0R3I.L trades at £100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0R3I.L's P/E ratio is -20.66. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0R3I.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to 0R3I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check 0R3I.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs DRX.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, DRX.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while DRX.L trades at £682.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas DRX.L's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to DRX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to DRX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check DRX.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs 0QOH.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0QOH.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0QOH.L trades at £32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0QOH.L's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0QOH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L and 0QOH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0QOH.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs GRP.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, GRP.L has a market cap of 857.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while GRP.L trades at £0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas GRP.L's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to GRP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to GRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check GRP.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs 0E9V.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0E9V.L has a market cap of 688.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0E9V.L trades at £48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0E9V.L's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0E9V.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to 0E9V.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check 0E9V.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs 0EIB.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0EIB.L has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0EIB.L trades at £1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0EIB.L's P/E ratio is 211.20. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0EIB.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to 0EIB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check 0EIB.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs 0GHX.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0GHX.L has a market cap of 171.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0GHX.L trades at £4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0GHX.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0GHX.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to 0GHX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check 0GHX.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs IES.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, IES.L has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while IES.L trades at £21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas IES.L's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to IES.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to IES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check IES.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs GOOD.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, GOOD.L has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while GOOD.L trades at £489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas GOOD.L's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to GOOD.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L and GOOD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GOOD.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs 0QQT.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0QQT.L has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0QQT.L trades at £48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0QQT.L's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0QQT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L and 0QQT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0QQT.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs 0QQG.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, 0QQG.L has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while 0QQG.L trades at £41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas 0QQG.L's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to 0QQG.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to 0QQG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check 0QQG.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs PHE.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, PHE.L has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while PHE.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas PHE.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to PHE.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to PHE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check PHE.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs ATOM.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ATOM.L has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while ATOM.L trades at £48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas ATOM.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to ATOM.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to ATOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check ATOM.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs CPH2.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, CPH2.L has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while CPH2.L trades at £5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas CPH2.L's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to CPH2.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to CPH2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check CPH2.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs SAE.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, SAE.L has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while SAE.L trades at £1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas SAE.L's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to SAE.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to SAE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check SAE.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs MAST.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, MAST.L has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while MAST.L trades at £78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas MAST.L's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to MAST.L's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to MAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check MAST.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs NZI.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, NZI.L has a market cap of 819.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while NZI.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas NZI.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to NZI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L and NZI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZI.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs CODX.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, CODX.L has a market cap of 467.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while CODX.L trades at £5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas CODX.L's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to CODX.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L and CODX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODX.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs PPG.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, PPG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while PPG.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas PPG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to PPG.L's ROE of +13.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to PPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check PPG.L's competition here
PNPL.L vs ZOE.L Comparison August 2025
PNPL.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNPL.L stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ZOE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PNPL.L is priced at £2.74, while ZOE.L trades at £37.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNPL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -2.74, whereas ZOE.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PNPL.L's ROE is -4.35%, compared to ZOE.L's ROE of -6.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PNPL.L is less volatile compared to ZOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNPL.L.Check ZOE.L's competition here