Pengram Corporation
Pengram Corporation PNGM Peers
See (PNGM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNGM | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 5.8K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CHZQ | $0.01 | +4900.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.04 | +1.55% | 127.1B | 11.18 | $2.24 | +4.95% |
| RTNTF | $73.74 | +3.66% | 121.3B | 10.43 | $7.07 | +3.19% |
| RTPPF | $58.19 | -1.53% | 99.1B | 8.23 | $7.07 | +6.91% |
| GLCNF | $3.93 | +2.95% | 47.3B | -30.25 | -$0.13 | +2.94% |
| GLNCY | $7.80 | +2.50% | 46.9B | -30.00 | -$0.26 | +2.76% |
| GMBXF | $5.35 | -3.95% | 41.6B | 11.15 | $0.48 | +4.64% |
| AAUKF | $30.00 | -0.92% | 41.4B | -10.45 | -$2.87 | +2.12% |
| FSUGY | $19.87 | +1.72% | 30.5B | 7.85 | $2.53 | +9.15% |
Stock Comparison
PNGM vs CHZQ Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while CHZQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BHPLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BHPLF trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs RTNTF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while RTNTF trades at $73.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs RTPPF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while RTPPF trades at $58.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs GLCNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while GLCNF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs GLNCY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while GLNCY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs GMBXF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AAUKF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AAUKF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs FSUGY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while FSUGY trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs FSUMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while FSUMF trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs NGLOY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while NGLOY trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs CNSUF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while CNSUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs CMCLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while CMCLF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs TCKRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while TCKRF trades at $32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 648.20. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs JXMNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs IVPAF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while IVPAF trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BOLIF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BDNNY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BDNNY trades at $64.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs IPOAF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while IPOAF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs SHTLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ABML Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs STMNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs SMMYY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while SMMYY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs LYSCF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while LYSCF trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 182.33. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs LYSDY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while LYSDY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 182.17. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PUTKF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PUTKY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PUTKY trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs NILSY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PAEKY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs FLMMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MALRY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MALRY trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PILBF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PILBF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -77.80. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs NGXXF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while NGXXF trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -41.93. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AFBOF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AFBOF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PWCRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PWCRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PTNDY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs DWMNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while DWMNF trades at $36.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MIMTF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MIMTF trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs IPGDF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while IPGDF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PTNDF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AZZVF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs NICMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while NICMF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MALRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs SOUHY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while SOUHY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.89. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs IIDDY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while IIDDY trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ERMAF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ERMAF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 100.53. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ERMAY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ERMAY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.17. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BSSMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs NCKAF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs CXXMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while CXXMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs DETRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while DETRF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ADTLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ADTLF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ADMLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ADMLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AZRMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ILKAF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ILKAF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MFRVF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs STTSY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while STTSY trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BQSSF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BQSSF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ILKAY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ILKAY trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs TTNNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while TTNNF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs LINRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while LINRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -40.37. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs FMCXF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while FMCXF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.89. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ATUSF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 916.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ATUSF trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs OSTTF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while OSTTF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AUSDF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 854.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AUSDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs GERFF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 833.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AFMJF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 784.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AFMJF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs AMVMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 676M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while AMVMF trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -55.13. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs TAOFF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 651.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while TAOFF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ALMTF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 648.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ALMTF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs VULNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while VULNF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BIRNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MJDLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MJDLF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs JMXXF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while JMXXF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PKREF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MCRZF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs FGOVF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -85.90. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MCHHF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MNXMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs REEMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 387.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while REEMF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs NQMIY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs WYCC Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while WYCC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is less volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs CTJHY Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs BELMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 337.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while BELMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is less volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ERLFF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 335.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.36. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs KMRPF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MLYCF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 320.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MLYCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MLYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs FWEDF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 318M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while FWEDF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs MLXEF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 310.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ARAFF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 298.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs CGMLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 291.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while CGMLF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs EGMMF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while EGMMF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs SVMLF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs LTSRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 274.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs ERDCF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while ERDCF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -73.47. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs LRSRF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs PMETF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while PMETF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs SLGGF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.
PNGM vs STQNF Comparison
PNGM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNGM stands at 5.8K. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PNGM is priced at $0.00, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNGM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, PNGM's ROE is +2.59%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNGM is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNGM.