Plyzer Technologies Inc.
Plyzer Technologies Inc. PLYZ Peers
See (PLYZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLYZ | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 119 | N/A | -$0.09 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $19.12 | +0.58% | 60.2B | 56.24 | $0.34 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,904.70 | +1.53% | 60B | 56.50 | $33.71 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $58.50 | N/A | 38B | 14.20 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.31% |
| NTTCF | $0.04 | +39900.00% | 17.9B | -0.05 | -$0.88 | N/A |
| TOITF | $129.98 | +1.47% | 10.8B | 95.57 | $1.36 | N/A |
| TMICY | $75.71 | -1.63% | 10B | 44.54 | $1.70 | +1.25% |
| NEXPF | $6.05 | +2.20% | 7.3B | 37.81 | $0.16 | +4.10% |
| NEXXY | $5.90 | -1.67% | 7.2B | 36.88 | $0.16 | +4.14% |
Stock Comparison
PLYZ vs ADYEY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 56.24. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs ADYYF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,904.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs BSQKZ Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and BSQKZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs KAKZF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and KAKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs NTTCF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while NTTCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs TOITF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $129.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs TMICY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $75.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 44.54. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs NEXPF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs NEXXY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 36.88. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and NEXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs TMICF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $50.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs DRKTY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and DRKTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs GMYTF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $50.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SWDAF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs STWRY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and STWRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs OVHFF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 177.78. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and OVHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs CIOXY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs EXNWF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and EXNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs DRKTF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and DRKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs WWLNF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and WWLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs WRDLY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SPNUF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SPNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs SANP Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs PHPYF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and PHPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs EXOD Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, EXOD has a market cap of 822.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while EXOD trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXOD's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to EXOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs MGPPF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 150.67. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and MGPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs CPLFF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and CPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs PRTHU Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 630.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and PRTHU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs DYNDF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 483.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs TDCSF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 462M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and TDCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FMZNF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 427.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and FMZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FNCHF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 426.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and FNCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs PYPTF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 422.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs HISNF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 415.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs YHEKF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 406M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SPMYY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.33. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SPMYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs NFONF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and NFONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs CORZQ Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SERKF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -24.09. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SERKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs ABANF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 320M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and ABANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs TYPMF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and TYPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs OTPMF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and OTPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FFPP Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and FFPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs SEEMF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SEEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs ERDLF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -40.68. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and ERDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FSOYF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and FSOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs GIVXF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and GIVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs CGAAY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and CGAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs PYFRF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and PYFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FCLOF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and FCLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs BGOPF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs VRSSF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs HAIVF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is 55.33. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and HAIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs ISDCF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs WHEN Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs CORZR Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs CROTF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and CROTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs DGGXF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SKKY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs QBITF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and QBITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs JGHG Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs APGT Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs NOWVF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -49.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs TFLM Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and TFLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs CLOQ Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs POTTF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and POTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs CLPMF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs PLCKF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs CYBNY Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and CYBNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs SDCH Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs QFEEF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and QFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs EPXGF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and EPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs DLTXF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and DLTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs DSAIF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and DSAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FOBIF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs DRKOF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and DRKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs IPNFF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and IPNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs PKKFF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SLXXF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SLXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs DVPNF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and DVPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs TGCB Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and TGCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs SCYRF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SCYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs VENZF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs SFIIF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs RCWDF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs NBVAF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and NBVAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs PKLBF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and PKLBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs OVTZ Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs ATCHW Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while ATCHW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and ATCHW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs MODGF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and MODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs RKNEF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and RKNEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs KCRD Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and KCRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs MBLMF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and MBLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs RIHT Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and RIHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs TONR Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs VISM Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and VISM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs FUAPF Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ is less volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYZ.
PLYZ vs FSRDQ Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and FSRDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs SMKG Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SMKG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PLYZ vs SMME Comparison
PLYZ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYZ stands at 119. In comparison, SMME has a market cap of 573.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PLYZ is priced at $0.00, while SMME trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYZ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMME's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYZ and SMME have similar daily volatility (0.00).