Playfair Mining Ltd.
Playfair Mining Ltd. PLYFF Peers
See (PLYFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLYFF | $0.02 | +250.00% | 2.28M | -0.88 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.50 | -1.01% | 124.33B | 10.75 | $2.28 | +5.06% |
| RTNTF | $78.57 | +3.89% | 108.42B | 11.11 | $7.07 | +2.99% |
| RTPPF | $62.25 | +1.22% | 106.69B | 8.80 | $7.07 | +6.46% |
| GLCNF | $3.56 | -1.43% | 42.76B | -27.37 | -$0.13 | +3.23% |
| GLNCY | $7.08 | -2.01% | 42.51B | -27.21 | -$0.26 | +3.04% |
| GMBXF | $5.44 | +2.10% | 42.37B | 11.83 | $0.46 | +2.38% |
| NGLOY | $14.19 | +0.92% | 34.44B | -11.17 | -$1.27 | +2.26% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | -1.04% | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| FSUMF | $10.85 | +1.43% | 33.36B | 8.54 | $1.27 | +8.16% |
Stock Comparison
PLYFF vs BHPLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 124.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while BHPLF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs RTNTF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 108.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while RTNTF trades at $78.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs RTPPF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 106.69B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while RTPPF trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs GLCNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while GLCNF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs GLNCY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while GLNCY trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.21. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs GMBXF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 42.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while GMBXF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs NGLOY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while NGLOY trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AAUKF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs FSUMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while FSUMF trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs FSUGY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while FSUGY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs CMCLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while CMCLF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs TCKRF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 17.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs IVPAF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while IVPAF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs BOLIF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs BDNNY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while BDNNY trades at $64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs SHTLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs IPOAF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while IPOAF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 122.22. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs JXMNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ABML Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs SMMYY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while SMMYY trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 55.43. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs STMNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PUTKF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PUTKY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PUTKY trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs NILSY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LYSCF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LYSCF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 162.04. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LYSDY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LYSDY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 161.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PAEKY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MALRF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs FLMMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MALRY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MALRY trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PILBF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PILBF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs CHZQ Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs NGXXF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while NGXXF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -36.36. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MIMTF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PTNDF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AZZVF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs IPGDF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while IPGDF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs DWMNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs IIDDY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs SOUHY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while SOUHY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs NICMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while NICMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ERMAF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ERMAY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PTNDY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AFBOF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs DETRF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while DETRF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ILKAY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ILKAY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AZRMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ILKAF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ADTLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ADTLF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ADMLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ADMLF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LINRF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LINRF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -41.93. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs BQSSF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 941.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while BQSSF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -56.75. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs FMCXF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 934.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while FMCXF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.50. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ATUSF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 921.14M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ATUSF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs STTSY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AUSDF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs JMXXF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AFMJF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 855.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs VULNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 704.94M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while VULNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AMVMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.79M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MFRVF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs CTJHF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs TAOFF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ALMTF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 500.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ALMTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs TTNNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs OSTTF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MJDLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 486.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MJDLF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MCRZF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs BIRNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs REEMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 394.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while REEMF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LLLAF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 390.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs FGOVF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 382.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while FGOVF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -72.42. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs NQMIY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PXMFF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MCHHF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 369.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MCHHF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs CTJHY Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MNXMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 344.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MNXMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ERLFF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 335.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ERLFF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs KMRPF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MLYF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs AUMTF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs MLXEF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 301.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs SLGGF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs FWEDF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 280.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while FWEDF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs SVMLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 277.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -42.95. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ARAFF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 274.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LTSRF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 273.47M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs CGMLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 272.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while CGMLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LRSRF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs STQNF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs ERDCF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 246.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while ERDCF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -67.93. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PMETF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 241.14M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PMETF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -51.15. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs RXRLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs LTHHF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs BSRUF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs PTTMF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs CILLF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.
PLYFF vs SYAAF Comparison
PLYFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLYFF stands at 2.28M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 229.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PLYFF is priced at $0.02, while SYAAF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLYFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, PLYFF's ROE is +215.98%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLYFF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLYFF.