Plug Power Inc.
Plug Power Inc. PLUN.F Peers
See (PLUN.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLUN.F | $0.69 | -5.51% | 743.52M | -0.31 | -$2.19 | N/A |
| DLSF.F | $19.30 | N/A | 241.09B | 643.33 | $0.03 | N/A |
| LU2.DE | $75.90 | -0.78% | 5.27B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PLUN.DE | $0.73 | -1.31% | 782.77M | -0.33 | -$2.19 | N/A |
| KTEK.DE | $15.10 | +0.33% | 218.13M | -167.78 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| T9Z.DE | $4.82 | +0.52% | 205.24M | 12.68 | $0.38 | +5.19% |
| 6I4.F | $1.88 | +0.75% | 158.46M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HNL.DE | $11.45 | +5.05% | 69.41M | -5.35 | -$2.14 | N/A |
| 1O2.F | $0.10 | +47.33% | 57.66M | -0.24 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| VAR1.DE | $1.21 | -3.04% | 51.64M | -0.17 | -$7.18 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PLUN.F vs DLSF.F Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, DLSF.F has a market cap of 241.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while DLSF.F trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DLSF.F's P/E ratio is 643.33. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DLSF.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to DLSF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs LU2.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, LU2.DE has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while LU2.DE trades at $75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LU2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LU2.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to LU2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs PLUN.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, PLUN.DE has a market cap of 782.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while PLUN.DE trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PLUN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLUN.DE's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to PLUN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs KTEK.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, KTEK.DE has a market cap of 218.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while KTEK.DE trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KTEK.DE's P/E ratio is -167.78. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to KTEK.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to KTEK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs T9Z.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, T9Z.DE has a market cap of 205.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while T9Z.DE trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas T9Z.DE's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to T9Z.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to T9Z.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs 6I4.F Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, 6I4.F has a market cap of 158.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while 6I4.F trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas 6I4.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to 6I4.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to 6I4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs HNL.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, HNL.DE has a market cap of 69.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while HNL.DE trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HNL.DE's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HNL.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to HNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs 1O2.F Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, 1O2.F has a market cap of 57.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while 1O2.F trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas 1O2.F's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to 1O2.F's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is less volatile compared to 1O2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs VAR1.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, VAR1.DE has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while VAR1.DE trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VAR1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VAR1.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to VAR1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs LMIA.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, LMIA.DE has a market cap of 20.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while LMIA.DE trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMIA.DE's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LMIA.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to LMIA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs LMIA.F Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, LMIA.F has a market cap of 20.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while LMIA.F trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMIA.F's P/E ratio is -20.62. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LMIA.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to LMIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs LEO.DE Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, LEO.DE has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while LEO.DE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LEO.DE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LEO.DE's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is less volatile compared to LEO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs 0E9.F Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, 0E9.F has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while 0E9.F trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas 0E9.F's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to 0E9.F's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is more volatile compared to 0E9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.
PLUN.F vs C0M.F Comparison
PLUN.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLUN.F stands at 743.52M. In comparison, C0M.F has a market cap of 557677.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLUN.F is priced at $0.69, while C0M.F trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLUN.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas C0M.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLUN.F's ROE is -0.79%, compared to C0M.F's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLUN.F is less volatile compared to C0M.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLUN.F.