ParcelPal Logistics Inc.

PKG.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PKG.CN stands at 556.1K. In comparison, AND.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PKG.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while AND.TO trades at CA$53.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PKG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AND.TO's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, PKG.CN's ROE is +4.52%, compared to AND.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PKG.CN is less volatile compared to AND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PKG.CN.Check AND.TO's competition here

PKG.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PKG.CN stands at 556.1K. In comparison, CJT.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PKG.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while CJT.TO trades at CA$98.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PKG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CJT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, PKG.CN's ROE is +4.52%, compared to CJT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PKG.CN is less volatile compared to CJT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PKG.CN.Check CJT.TO's competition here

PKG.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PKG.CN stands at 556.1K. In comparison, TTNM.TO has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, PKG.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while TTNM.TO trades at CA$1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PKG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TTNM.TO's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, PKG.CN's ROE is +4.52%, compared to TTNM.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PKG.CN is less volatile compared to TTNM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PKG.CN.Check TTNM.TO's competition here

PKG.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PKG.CN stands at 556.1K. In comparison, PDO.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PKG.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PDO.CN trades at CA$0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PKG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PDO.CN's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, PKG.CN's ROE is +4.52%, compared to PDO.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PKG.CN is less volatile compared to PDO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PKG.CN.Check PDO.CN's competition here