Ping Identity Holding Corp.
Ping Identity Holding Corp. PING Peers
See (PING) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PING | $28.50 | +0.11% | N/A | -34.38 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| MSFT | $454.27 | +0.25% | 3.38T | 35.05 | $12.96 | +0.72% |
| ORCL | $160.50 | +0.69% | 450.08B | 37.68 | $4.26 | +1.06% |
| PLTR | $129.49 | +1.07% | 305.58B | 563.00 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $417.13 | +3.07% | 177.78B | 27.55 | $15.14 | N/A |
| PANW | $192.93 | +0.02% | 127.74B | 109.00 | $1.77 | N/A |
| CRWD | $439.26 | +1.72% | 109.41B | -4880.67 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.59 | +1.98% | 80.05B | 43.04 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $514.43 | -0.01% | 79.54B | 61.76 | $8.33 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PING vs MSFT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.38T. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while MSFT trades at $454.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ORCL Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 450.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ORCL trades at $160.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PLTR Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 305.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PLTR trades at $129.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 563.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ADBE Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 177.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ADBE trades at $417.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PANW Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 127.74B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PANW trades at $192.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 109.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CRWD Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 109.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CRWD trades at $439.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -4880.67. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs FTNT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while FTNT trades at $104.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.04. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SNPS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 79.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SNPS trades at $514.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 61.76. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs VMW Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NET Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 54.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NET trades at $157.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -655.54. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs HOOD Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 54.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while HOOD trades at $61.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SQ Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ZS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 38.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ZS trades at $251.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2515.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CRWV Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 38.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CRWV trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -35.53. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CRWV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs XYZ Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 35.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while XYZ trades at $57.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NETE Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs GDDY Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 27.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while GDDY trades at $190.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs IOT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 27.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while IOT trades at $47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -169.37. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs VRSN Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while VRSN trades at $283.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SPLK Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs TOST Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while TOST trades at $44.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 165.74. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CPAY Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CPAY trades at $348.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CHKP Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CHKP trades at $218.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NTNX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 22.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NTNX trades at $82.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -318.35. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs FLT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs OKTA Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 21.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while OKTA trades at $127.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2121.67. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs GEN Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while GEN trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CYBR Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 17.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CYBR trades at $355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -175.74. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs AFRM Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 16.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while AFRM trades at $52.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -276.68. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs FFIV Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while FFIV trades at $284.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs RBRK Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while RBRK trades at $85.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs KSPI Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while KSPI trades at $83.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs MDB Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while MDB trades at $191.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -110.57. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NLOK Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs AKAM Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while AKAM trades at $78.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SAIL Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SAIL trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs DOX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while DOX trades at $91.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs WIX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while WIX trades at $182.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 77.77. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs KVYO Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while KVYO trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -207.06. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ALTR Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PLAN Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs DBX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while DBX trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CFLT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CFLT trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PATH Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PATH trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -99.31. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs HCP Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs INFA Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while INFA trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 656.67. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs JCOM Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SQSP Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs S Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while S trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.96. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NEWR Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs FOUR Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while FOUR trades at $90.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CCCS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CCCS trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 912.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SPSC Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SPSC trades at $150.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 73.99. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs VRNS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while VRNS trades at $46.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ACIW Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ACIW trades at $48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs QLYS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while QLYS trades at $136.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NVEI Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs EEFT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while EEFT trades at $111.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs WEX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while WEX trades at $139.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs BOX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while BOX trades at $32.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs RELY Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while RELY trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -759.67. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CLBT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CLBT trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs TENB Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while TENB trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -86.58. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs AVPT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while AVPT trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -149.08. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ESMT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs STNE Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while STNE trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.13. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ODD Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ODD trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs DLO Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while DLO trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CORZZ Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CORZZ trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CORZ Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CORZ trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SWI Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs EVOP Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PAGS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PAGS trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs DOCN Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while DOCN trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PAYO Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PAYO trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs EVTC Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while EVTC trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs APPN Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while APPN trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs MQ Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while MQ trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs BB Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while BB trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -394.50. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs TDC Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while TDC trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs FIVN Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while FIVN trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -467.50. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs GETVV Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs AVDX Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while AVDX trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.25. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs FORG Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs RAMP Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while RAMP trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -734.00. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CSGS Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CSGS trades at $65.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs EVCM Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while EVCM trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -86.33. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs GSKY Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs GET Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs NTCT Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while NTCT trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs STER Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs AVPTW Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while AVPTW trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs CORZW Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while CORZW trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs ZUO Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs RPD Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while RPD trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 57.85. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs SUMO Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs GB Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while GB trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs TUYA Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while TUYA trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 273.50. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.
PING vs PAYA Comparison
PING plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PING stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PING is priced at $28.50, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PING currently has a P/E ratio of -34.38, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, PING's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PING is less volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PING.