Haulotte Group SA

PIG.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PIG.PA stands at 76.01M. In comparison, CATR.PA has a market cap of 159.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PIG.PA is priced at $2.58, while CATR.PA trades at $327.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PIG.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.53, whereas CATR.PA's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, PIG.PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CATR.PA's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PIG.PA is more volatile compared to CATR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PIG.PA.

PIG.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PIG.PA stands at 76.01M. In comparison, EXE.PA has a market cap of 235.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PIG.PA is priced at $2.58, while EXE.PA trades at $34.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PIG.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.53, whereas EXE.PA's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, PIG.PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PIG.PA is more volatile compared to EXE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PIG.PA.

PIG.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PIG.PA stands at 76.01M. In comparison, HYDRA.AS has a market cap of 215.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PIG.PA is priced at $2.58, while HYDRA.AS trades at $166.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PIG.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.53, whereas HYDRA.AS's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, PIG.PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYDRA.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PIG.PA is more volatile compared to HYDRA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PIG.PA.

PIG.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PIG.PA stands at 76.01M. In comparison, ALWF.PA has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PIG.PA is priced at $2.58, while ALWF.PA trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PIG.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.53, whereas ALWF.PA's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, PIG.PA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALWF.PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PIG.PA is more volatile compared to ALWF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PIG.PA.