Petershill Partners PLC

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HAHRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while HAHRF trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas HAHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAHRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to HAHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check HAHRF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SREDF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while SREDF trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas SREDF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SREDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to SREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check SREDF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SREDY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while SREDY trades at $21.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas SREDY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SREDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to SREDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check SREDY's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CYLTF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while CYLTF trades at $6.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas CYLTF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYLTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to CYLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check CYLTF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KNKBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while KNKBF trades at $11.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas KNKBF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNKBF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to KNKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check KNKBF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AMLTF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while AMLTF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas AMLTF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to AMLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check AMLTF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, THNVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while THNVF trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas THNVF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THNVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to THNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check THNVF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, THNUY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while THNUY trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas THNUY's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THNUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to THNUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check THNUY's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GDLC has a market cap of 795.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while GDLC trades at $50.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas GDLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to GDLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check GDLC's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TMILF has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while TMILF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas TMILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMILF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to TMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check TMILF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MGOM has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while MGOM trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas MGOM's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to MGOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check MGOM's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PCTZF has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while PCTZF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas PCTZF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCTZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to PCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check PCTZF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FNQQF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while FNQQF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas FNQQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNQQF's ROE of +3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to FNQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check FNQQF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NACQF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while NACQF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas NACQF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NACQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to NACQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check NACQF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FGCO has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while FGCO trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas FGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to FGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check FGCO's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RLYNF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while RLYNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas RLYNF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLYNF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to RLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check RLYNF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MSBM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while MSBM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas MSBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSBM's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to MSBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check MSBM's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GPLB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while GPLB trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas GPLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to GPLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check GPLB's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SPXA has a market cap of 581K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while SPXA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas SPXA's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPXA's ROE of +174.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to SPXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check SPXA's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RNBI has a market cap of 27.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while RNBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas RNBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RNBI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to RNBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check RNBI's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PGIE has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while PGIE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas PGIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PGIE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to PGIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check PGIE's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TMOL has a market cap of 20.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while TMOL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas TMOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMOL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to TMOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check TMOL's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, XYNH has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while XYNH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas XYNH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYNH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to XYNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check XYNH's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IMMG has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while IMMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas IMMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to IMMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check IMMG's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EWPI has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while EWPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas EWPI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EWPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to EWPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check EWPI's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PWEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while PWEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas PWEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWEI's ROE of -4.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to PWEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check PWEI's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARGW has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while ARGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas ARGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARGW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to ARGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check ARGW's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KCPC has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while KCPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas KCPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KCPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to KCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check KCPC's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AQFD has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while AQFD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas AQFD's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AQFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to AQFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check AQFD's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EURI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while EURI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas EURI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EURI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to EURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check EURI's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ODMO has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while ODMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas ODMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODMO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to ODMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check ODMO's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HLOI has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while HLOI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas HLOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLOI's ROE of +36.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to HLOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check HLOI's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AKSY has a market cap of 40. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while AKSY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas AKSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKSY's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to AKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check AKSY's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ESQF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while ESQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas ESQF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to ESQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check ESQF's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, APLN has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while APLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas APLN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to APLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check APLN's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AHLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while AHLD trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas AHLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to AHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check AHLD's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MGLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while MGLO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas MGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to MGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check MGLO's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AHCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while AHCD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas AHCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to AHCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check AHCD's competition here

PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OGGCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.10, while OGGCS trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.63, whereas OGGCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OGGCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to OGGCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.Check OGGCS's competition here