Petershill Partners PLC
Petershill Partners PLC PHLLF Peers
See (PHLLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHLLF | $3.50 | -2.82% | 3.79B | 4.09 | $0.86 | +11.98% |
| SREDY | $21.56 | +100.00% | 9.31B | 10.37 | $2.08 | +2.78% |
| SREDF | $10.75 | -5.45% | 4.64B | 8.74 | $1.23 | +4.03% |
| KNKBF | $11.12 | -5.01% | 3.13B | -0.43 | -$25.75 | +19.87% |
| CYLTF | $4.74 | -3.46% | 2.33B | 5.91 | $0.80 | +4.38% |
| HAHRF | $10.24 | +68.70% | 2.11B | N/A | N/A | +5.77% |
| AMLTF | $0.83 | +25.57% | 2.10B | 20.75 | $0.04 | +3.99% |
| THNVF | $1.08 | N/A | 1.39B | 7.20 | $0.15 | +5.71% |
| THNUY | $9.85 | N/A | 1.03B | 6.08 | $1.62 | +13.14% |
| GDLC | $42.09 | +1.30% | 667.86M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PHLLF vs SREDY Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, SREDY has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while SREDY trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas SREDY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SREDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to SREDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs SREDF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, SREDF has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while SREDF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas SREDF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SREDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to SREDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs KNKBF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, KNKBF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while KNKBF trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas KNKBF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNKBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to KNKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs CYLTF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, CYLTF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while CYLTF trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas CYLTF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYLTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to CYLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs HAHRF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, HAHRF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while HAHRF trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas HAHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAHRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to HAHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs AMLTF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, AMLTF has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while AMLTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas AMLTF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to AMLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs THNVF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, THNVF has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while THNVF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas THNVF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THNVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to THNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs THNUY Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, THNUY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while THNUY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas THNUY's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THNUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to THNUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs GDLC Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, GDLC has a market cap of 667.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while GDLC trades at $42.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas GDLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to GDLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs TMILF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, TMILF has a market cap of 322.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while TMILF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas TMILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMILF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to TMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs POLEU Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 302.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while POLEU trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POLEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs FACTU Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 249.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while FACTU trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FACTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs MGOM Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, MGOM has a market cap of 75.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while MGOM trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas MGOM's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to MGOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs PCTZF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, PCTZF has a market cap of 16.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while PCTZF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas PCTZF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCTZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to PCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs NACQF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, NACQF has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while NACQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas NACQF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NACQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to NACQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs FGCO Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, FGCO has a market cap of 13.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while FGCO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas FGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to FGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs RLYNF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, RLYNF has a market cap of 7.94M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while RLYNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas RLYNF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLYNF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to RLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs FNQQF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, FNQQF has a market cap of 5.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while FNQQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas FNQQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNQQF's ROE of +3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to FNQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs GPLB Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, GPLB has a market cap of 2.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while GPLB trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas GPLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to GPLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs TMOL Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, TMOL has a market cap of 994673.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while TMOL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas TMOL's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMOL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to TMOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs SPXA Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, SPXA has a market cap of 580954.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while SPXA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas SPXA's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPXA's ROE of +174.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to SPXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs FSHPR Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 238232.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while FSHPR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs MSBM Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, MSBM has a market cap of 43866.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while MSBM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas MSBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSBM's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to MSBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs RNBI Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, RNBI has a market cap of 27348.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while RNBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas RNBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RNBI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to RNBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs PGIE Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, PGIE has a market cap of 20222.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while PGIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas PGIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PGIE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to PGIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs XYNH Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, XYNH has a market cap of 15990.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while XYNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas XYNH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYNH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to XYNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs IMMG Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, IMMG has a market cap of 15175.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while IMMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas IMMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to IMMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs EWPI Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, EWPI has a market cap of 11930.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while EWPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas EWPI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EWPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to EWPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs PWEI Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, PWEI has a market cap of 11267.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while PWEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas PWEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to PWEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs ARGW Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, ARGW has a market cap of 5196.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while ARGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas ARGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARGW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to ARGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs KCPC Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, KCPC has a market cap of 4458.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while KCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas KCPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KCPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to KCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs AQFD Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, AQFD has a market cap of 3024.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while AQFD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas AQFD's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AQFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to AQFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs EURI Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, EURI has a market cap of 2560.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while EURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas EURI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EURI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is less volatile compared to EURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs ODMO Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, ODMO has a market cap of 1109.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while ODMO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas ODMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to ODMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs HLOI Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, HLOI has a market cap of 1015.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while HLOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas HLOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLOI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to HLOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs AKSY Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, AKSY has a market cap of 40.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while AKSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas AKSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKSY's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to AKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs ESQF Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, ESQF has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while ESQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas ESQF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to ESQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.
PHLLF vs APLN Comparison
PHLLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLLF stands at 3.79B. In comparison, APLN has a market cap of 16.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLLF is priced at $3.50, while APLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLLF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.09, whereas APLN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLLF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLLF is more volatile compared to APLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLLF.