PHI Group, Inc.
PHI Group, Inc. PHIG Peers
See (PHIG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHIG | $24.50 | N/A | 595.6M | N/A | N/A | +4.08% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +7.75% | 123B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +16.41% |
| CIIHY | $28.39 | +2.12% | 58.5B | 13.52 | $2.10 | +3.42% |
| MQBKY | $141.80 | -1.09% | 54.6B | 19.75 | $7.18 | +2.94% |
| MCQEF | $140.85 | +2.00% | 51.4B | 19.59 | $7.19 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $2.55 | N/A | 47.3B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.93% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | N/A | 38B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +4.53% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.16% |
| NRSCF | $6.11 | +0.41% | 18B | 7.83 | $0.78 | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
PHIG vs IBKKF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs HAITY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CIIHY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CIIHY trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs MQBKY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while MQBKY trades at $141.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs MCQEF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while MCQEF trades at $140.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CIIHF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs GUOSF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs HTNGF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs NRSCF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while NRSCF trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and NRSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CMSQF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CMSQF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CMSQY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CMSQY trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs HUATF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CNICF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs DSECF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DSECF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and DSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs DSEEY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DSEEY trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs WSOUF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BRPHF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs IVTJF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while IVTJF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs IGGHY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while IGGHY trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs IVTJY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs IGGRF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CLPE Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CLPE trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1400.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CGXYY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CGXYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs LTSAP Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while LTSAP trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and LTSAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs PLSQF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs TCAPF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs LTSA Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs NHMAF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and NHMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs FNNTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs MAUSY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs MNXBF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs DEFTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CFNCF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CFNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CBGPF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs LKADF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CBGPY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 737.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CBGPY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CCORF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 699.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CCORF trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CCORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs ARCNF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 697.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and ARCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CNSRF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 672.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CNSRF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs PHIGW Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 583.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CAGPF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 523.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CAGPF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -86.36. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs NAGGF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CESTY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CYFRF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CYFRF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 200.50. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs ABGSF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CESTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs ABIT Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while ABIT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs APPCF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs OSHDF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CSCHF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs NPPTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 146.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while NPPTF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 57.65. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs PNPFF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while PNPFF trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs GEVI Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while GEVI trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs OZFRY Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs STGC Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs HAFG Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while HAFG trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CURN Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CURN trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs XAUMF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while XAUMF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs DGTLF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs UFFRF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs DMGGF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DMGGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BBKCF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BBKCF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CBTTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CBTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CMZZF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs ARBKF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while ARBKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs DYNA Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and DYNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CRMZ Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CRMZ trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CRMZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CFLSF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs EBML Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs SMURF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BCNWF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs FWAV Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs EZTD Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, EZTD has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while EZTD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZTD's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to EZTD's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to EZTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs FDCT Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while FDCT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BULT Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BULT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs AVFCF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and AVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs DPXCF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs MATEF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs ABSOF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs TRAA Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs HYHDF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while HYHDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and HYHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs FFTTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BTCWF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BTCWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs IHLDF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while IHLDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs ITEX Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while ITEX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and ITEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs HIPH Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and HIPH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs AAMTF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CCPUF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CCPUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs BLVDF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CSTXF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and CSTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs PHIL Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BZRD Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PHIG vs CRKR Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BKBLF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs GBCHF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs BKLIF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs DBKSF Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while DBKSF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs CBTC Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHIG.
PHIG vs PIHG Comparison
PHIG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHIG stands at 595.6M. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHIG is priced at $24.50, while PIHG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHIG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, PHIG's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PHIG and PIHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).