PGE Polska Grupa Energetyczna S.A.
PGE Polska Grupa Energetyczna S.A. (PGPKY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PGPKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGPKY | $4.58 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -1.46 | -$3.13 | N/A |
| NGGTF | $18.72 | -0.00% | 92B | 22.85 | $0.81 | +3.40% |
| ELEZY | $20.00 | +0.00% | 43.3B | 16.87 | $1.23 | +3.18% |
| ELEZF | $40.00 | +12.83% | 41.7B | 16.33 | $2.45 | +3.57% |
| NSARO | $83.00 | +0.00% | 30.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| NSARP | $71.90 | +0.00% | 29.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| AILIO | $69.89 | -0.01% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.55% |
| AILIP | $66.98 | -0.81% | 25.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.55% |
| HRNNF | $42.27 | +2.18% | 25.4B | 25.93 | $1.63 | +2.23% |
| CLPHY | $9.92 | +0.00% | 24.3B | 16.60 | $0.58 | +3.83% |
Stock Comparison
PGPKY vs NGGTF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while NGGTF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and NGGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGGTF's competition here
PGPKY vs ELEZY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ELEZY trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check ELEZY's competition here
PGPKY vs ELEZF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ELEZF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEZF's competition here
PGPKY vs NSARO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while NSARO trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
PGPKY vs NSARP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while NSARP trades at $71.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
PGPKY vs AILIO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while AILIO trades at $69.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
PGPKY vs AILIP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while AILIP trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and AILIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIP's competition here
PGPKY vs HRNNF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HRNNF trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check HRNNF's competition here
PGPKY vs CLPHY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CLPHY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check CLPHY's competition here
PGPKY vs TERRF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while TERRF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERRF's competition here
PGPKY vs CLPHF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CLPHF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
PGPKY vs TEZNY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while TEZNY trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check TEZNY's competition here
PGPKY vs CKISY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CKISY trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CKISY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISY's competition here
PGPKY vs TNABY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while TNABY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and TNABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNABY's competition here
PGPKY vs TNABF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while TNABF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check TNABF's competition here
PGPKY vs CKISF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CKISF trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CKISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISF's competition here
PGPKY vs ELIAF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ELIAF trades at $142.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ELIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIAF's competition here
PGPKY vs EMRAF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check EMRAF's competition here
PGPKY vs MAEOY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while MAEOY trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and MAEOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAEOY's competition here
PGPKY vs ENEAY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ENEAY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ENEAY trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ENEAY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ENEAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ENEAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENEAY's competition here
PGPKY vs RDEIY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while RDEIY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check RDEIY's competition here
PGPKY vs EQUEY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EQUEY trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQUEY's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPCO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPCO trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCO's competition here
PGPKY vs FTRSF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while FTRSF trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and FTRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTRSF's competition here
PGPKY vs FORFF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while FORFF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
PGPKY vs IESFY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while IESFY trades at $194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check IESFY's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPCN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPCN trades at $77.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPEP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPEP trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEP's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPEO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPEO trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPEO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEO's competition here
PGPKY vs HPIFF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HPIFF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPCP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPCP trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
PGPKY vs HKVTY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKVTY's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPEM Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPEM trades at $65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEM's competition here
PGPKY vs UEPEN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while UEPEN trades at $62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEN's competition here
PGPKY vs HPIFY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HPIFY trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HPIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFY's competition here
PGPKY vs HKCVF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
PGPKY vs CPWIF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CPWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWIF's competition here
PGPKY vs EGIEY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EGIEY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check EGIEY's competition here
PGPKY vs ABZPF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ABZPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPF's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWEM Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWEM trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check HAWEM's competition here
PGPKY vs WELPM Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while WELPM trades at $107.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
PGPKY vs ABOIF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ABOIF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABOIF's competition here
PGPKY vs RGPCF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGPCF's competition here
PGPKY vs WELPP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while WELPP trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPP's competition here
PGPKY vs AILLM Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while AILLM trades at $81.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
PGPKY vs AILLN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while AILLN trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
PGPKY vs AILIN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while AILIN trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
PGPKY vs AILLP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while AILLP trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and AILLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLP's competition here
PGPKY vs FPHHF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
PGPKY vs CUPUF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 569M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CUPUF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUPUF's competition here
PGPKY vs RELFF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
PGPKY vs CNTHP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNTHP trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHP's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLPL Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLPL trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check CNLPL's competition here
PGPKY vs CNTHO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNTHO trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
PGPKY vs ABTZY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ABTZY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
PGPKY vs CNTHN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNTHN trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHN's competition here
PGPKY vs ABZPY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and ABZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPY's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLHO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLHO trades at $37.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHO's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLHP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLHP trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHP's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLTP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLTP trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTP's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLPM Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLPM trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPM's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLTN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLTN trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTN's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLTL Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLTL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTL's competition here
PGPKY vs CNLHN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while CNLHN trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHN's competition here
PGPKY vs EDCFF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDCFF's competition here
PGPKY vs NZWFF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
PGPKY vs SUME Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while SUME trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SUME's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
PGPKY vs EUSP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EUSP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check EUSP's competition here
PGPKY vs MCPB Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while MCPB trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCPB's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWEN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWEN trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check HAWEN's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWLM Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWLM trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWEL Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWEL trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWEL's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWLI Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWLI trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and HAWLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLI's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWLL Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWLL trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check HAWLL's competition here
PGPKY vs HAWLN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 999.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while HAWLN trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check HAWLN's competition here
PGPKY vs RIGH Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and RIGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIGH's competition here
PGPKY vs USWF Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
PGPKY vs RENU Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and RENU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RENU's competition here
PGPKY vs EPGRQ Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 15. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
PGPKY vs IPWLO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here
PGPKY vs EVSO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check EVSO's competition here
PGPKY vs IPWLG Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
PGPKY vs NMPWP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while NMPWP trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here
PGPKY vs PNMXO Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while PNMXO trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNMXO's competition here
PGPKY vs NEWEN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while NEWEN trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWEN's competition here
PGPKY vs ENIAY Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGPKY.Check ENIAY's competition here
PGPKY vs IPWLN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLN's competition here
PGPKY vs IPWLP Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
PGPKY vs BANGN Comparison February 2026
PGPKY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGPKY stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGPKY is priced at $4.58, while BANGN trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGPKY currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGPKY's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGPKY and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here