ProVen Growth & Income VCT PLC
ProVen Growth & Income VCT PLC PGOO.L Peers
See (PGOO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGOO.L | £48.10 | +2.70% | 157.5M | 16.03 | £0.03 | +5.72% |
| UINC.L | £2,389.50 | +1.29% | 32.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.22% |
| DEM.L | £1,175.75 | +0.41% | 11.3B | N/A | N/A | +5.83% |
| DEMS.L | £2,151.25 | +0.54% | 11.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EEI.L | £1,142.60 | +0.25% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +4.61% |
| EEIP.L | £1,816.30 | +0.24% | 4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JGGI.L | £534.00 | +0.56% | 2.8B | 5.45 | £0.98 | +4.27% |
| GINC.L | £3,825.50 | +0.71% | 2.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.60% |
| FUSA.L | £13.10 | +0.27% | 2B | 23.54 | £0.56 | N/A |
| FUSP.L | £10.37 | +0.24% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PGOO.L vs UINC.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, UINC.L has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while UINC.L trades at £2,389.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas UINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to UINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DEM.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DEM.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DEM.L trades at £1,175.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DEMS.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DEMS.L has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DEMS.L trades at £2,151.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DEMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DEMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs EEI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, EEI.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while EEI.L trades at £1,142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EEI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to EEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs EEIP.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, EEIP.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while EEIP.L trades at £1,816.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EEIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to EEIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JGGI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JGGI.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JGGI.L trades at £534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JGGI.L's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JGGI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JGGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs GINC.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, GINC.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while GINC.L trades at £3,825.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas GINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to GINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FUSA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FUSA.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FUSA.L trades at £13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUSA.L's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FUSP.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FUSP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FUSP.L trades at £10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FUSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FUSD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FUSD.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FUSD.L trades at £10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUSD.L's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FUSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FGT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FGT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FGT.L trades at £914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FGT.L's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SEQI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SEQI.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SEQI.L trades at £81.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SEQI.L's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEQI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to SEQI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FUQA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FUQA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FUQA.L trades at £968.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUQA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUQA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FUQA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FUSI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FUSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FUSI.L trades at £808.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FUSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs WUKD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, WUKD.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while WUKD.L trades at £464.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas WUKD.L's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to WUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JSET.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JSET.L has a market cap of 945M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JSET.L trades at £90.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JSET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JSET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JSET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MUT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MUT.L has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MUT.L trades at £864.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MUT.L's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MUT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MUT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FGQP.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FGQP.L has a market cap of 846.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FGQP.L trades at £8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FGQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FGQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs TFIF.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, TFIF.L has a market cap of 839.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while TFIF.L trades at £111.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TFIF.L's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TFIF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to TFIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SOI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SOI.L has a market cap of 648M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SOI.L trades at £279.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SOI.L's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to SOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JPST.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JPST.L has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JPST.L trades at £101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JPST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JPST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JPST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JPSA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JPSA.L has a market cap of 644.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JPSA.L trades at £119.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JPSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JPSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JPSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FGQD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FGQD.L has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FGQD.L trades at £685.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs BSIF.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, BSIF.L has a market cap of 561.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while BSIF.L trades at £94.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BSIF.L's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSIF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L and BSIF.L have similar daily volatility (2.67).
PGOO.L vs JEGI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JEGI.L has a market cap of 514.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JEGI.L trades at £122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JEGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEGI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JEGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SEIT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SEIT.L has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SEIT.L trades at £44.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SEIT.L's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to SEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JPAS.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JPAS.L has a market cap of 476M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JPAS.L trades at £88.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JPAS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JPAS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JPAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JETI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JETI.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JETI.L trades at £175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JETI.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JETI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to JETI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs UIND.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, UIND.L has a market cap of 410.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while UIND.L trades at £32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas UIND.L's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UIND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to UIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DIG.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DIG.L has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DIG.L trades at £300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DIG.L's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIG.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JEMI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JEMI.L has a market cap of 388.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JEMI.L trades at £143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JEMI.L's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEMI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JEMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs NAIT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, NAIT.L has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while NAIT.L trades at £320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NAIT.L's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAIT.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to NAIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs HFEL.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, HFEL.L has a market cap of 380.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while HFEL.L trades at £219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HFEL.L's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HFEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to HFEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs BIPS.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, BIPS.L has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while BIPS.L trades at £172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BIPS.L's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIPS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to BIPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs HINT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, HINT.L has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while HINT.L trades at £175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HINT.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HINT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to HINT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CTUK.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CTUK.L has a market cap of 341.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CTUK.L trades at £337.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CTUK.L's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTUK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to CTUK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CMHY.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CMHY.L has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CMHY.L trades at £176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CMHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMHY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to CMHY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs AAIF.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, AAIF.L has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while AAIF.L trades at £216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AAIF.L's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to AAIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs HHI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, HHI.L has a market cap of 312.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while HHI.L trades at £183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HHI.L's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to HHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JAGI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JAGI.L has a market cap of 263.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JAGI.L trades at £373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JAGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JAGI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JAGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CCJI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CCJI.L has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CCJI.L trades at £189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CCJI.L's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCJI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to CCJI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs ASLI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, ASLI.L has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while ASLI.L trades at £59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ASLI.L's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASLI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to ASLI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SMIF.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SMIF.L has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SMIF.L trades at £86.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SMIF.L's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMIF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to SMIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs AERI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, AERI.L has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while AERI.L trades at £0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AERI.L's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AERI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to AERI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DIVI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DIVI.L has a market cap of 241.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DIVI.L trades at £102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DIVI.L's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIVI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DIVI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FA17.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FA17.L has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FA17.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FA17.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FA17.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FA17.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SCF.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SCF.L has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SCF.L trades at £311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SCF.L's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCF.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to SCF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FAIR.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FAIR.L has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FAIR.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FAIR.L's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAIR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FAIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JGSA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JGSA.L has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JGSA.L trades at £115.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JGSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JGSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JGSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JGST.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JGST.L has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JGST.L trades at £101.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JGST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JGST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to JGST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs HEIT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, HEIT.L has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while HEIT.L trades at £92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HEIT.L's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HEIT.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to HEIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CCJS.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CCJS.L has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CCJS.L trades at £0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CCJS.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCJS.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to CCJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs IGV.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, IGV.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while IGV.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas IGV.L's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IGV.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to IGV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JCGI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JCGI.L has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JCGI.L trades at £231.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JCGI.L's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JCGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to JCGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs TORO.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, TORO.L has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while TORO.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TORO.L's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TORO.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to TORO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SGQD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SGQD.L has a market cap of 179.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SGQD.L trades at £330.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to SGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs ASIZ.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, ASIZ.L has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while ASIZ.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ASIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASIZ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to ASIZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DHSD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DHSD.L has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DHSD.L trades at £24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DHSD.L's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHSD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DHSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs IVPG.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, IVPG.L has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while IVPG.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas IVPG.L's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVPG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to IVPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs AEI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, AEI.L has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while AEI.L trades at £353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AEI.L's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to AEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MGCI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MGCI.L has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MGCI.L trades at £95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MGCI.L's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGCI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MGCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MIX.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MIX.L has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MIX.L trades at £50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MIX.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIX.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs TIGT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, TIGT.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while TIGT.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TIGT.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TIGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to TIGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs ASIT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, ASIT.L has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while ASIT.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ASIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASIT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to ASIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DEMD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DEMD.L has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DEMD.L trades at £15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DEMD.L's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DHSA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DHSA.L has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DHSA.L trades at £30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DHSA.L's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DHSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs BRSA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, BRSA.L has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while BRSA.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BRSA.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRSA.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to BRSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs GABI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, GABI.L has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while GABI.L trades at £65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas GABI.L's P/E ratio is -21.87. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GABI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to GABI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MCT.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MCT.L has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MCT.L trades at £129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MCT.L's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCT.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to MCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CVCG.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CVCG.L has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CVCG.L trades at £119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CVCG.L's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVCG.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to CVCG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CYN.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CYN.L has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CYN.L trades at £207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CYN.L's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to CYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs BERI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, BERI.L has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while BERI.L trades at £113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BERI.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BERI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to BERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DHS.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DHS.L has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DHS.L trades at £1,830.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs ADIG.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, ADIG.L has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while ADIG.L trades at £45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ADIG.L's P/E ratio is -45.80. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADIG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to ADIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs HDIV.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, HDIV.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while HDIV.L trades at £66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HDIV.L's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HDIV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PGOO.L has daily volatility of 2.67 and HDIV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
PGOO.L vs FEMD.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FEMD.L has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FEMD.L trades at £4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs SHRS.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, SHRS.L has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while SHRS.L trades at £267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SHRS.L's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHRS.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to SHRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs CMPI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, CMPI.L has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while CMPI.L trades at £115.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CMPI.L's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMPI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to CMPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs DHSP.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, DHSP.L has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while DHSP.L trades at £2,239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to DHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs GRIW.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, GRIW.L has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while GRIW.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas GRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRIW.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to GRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FEMQ.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FEMQ.L has a market cap of 86.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FEMQ.L trades at £4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FEMQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEMQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FEMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs VIP.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, VIP.L has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while VIP.L trades at £205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas VIP.L's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to VIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MAV4.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MAV4.L has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MAV4.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MAV4.L's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAV4.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MAV4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MIG4.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MIG4.L has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MIG4.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MIG4.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIG4.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MIG4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MATE.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MATE.L has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MATE.L trades at £103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MATE.L's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MATE.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MATE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs RMII.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, RMII.L has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while RMII.L trades at £76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas RMII.L's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RMII.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to RMII.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MIG5.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MIG5.L has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MIG5.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MIG5.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIG5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MIG5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MIG1.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MIG1.L has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MIG1.L trades at £37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MIG1.L's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIG1.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to MIG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MIG3.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MIG3.L has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MIG3.L trades at £46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MIG3.L's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIG3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MIG3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs JEFI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, JEFI.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while JEFI.L trades at £94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEFI.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to JEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs ASCI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, ASCI.L has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while ASCI.L trades at £238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ASCI.L's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASCI.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to ASCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs MIG.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, MIG.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while MIG.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MIG.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to MIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs RCOI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, RCOI.L has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while RCOI.L trades at £0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas RCOI.L's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCOI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to RCOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs EEIA.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, EEIA.L has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while EEIA.L trades at £21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EEIA.L's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to EEIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FEQP.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FEQP.L has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FEQP.L trades at £8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FEQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FEQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs BRIG.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, BRIG.L has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while BRIG.L trades at £206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BRIG.L's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRIG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is less volatile compared to BRIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs FEUI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, FEUI.L has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while FEUI.L trades at £5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FEUI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEUI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to FEUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs ALAI.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, ALAI.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while ALAI.L trades at £62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ALAI.L's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALAI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to ALAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.
PGOO.L vs EDIV.L Comparison
PGOO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGOO.L stands at 157.5M. In comparison, EDIV.L has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGOO.L is priced at £48.10, while EDIV.L trades at £10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EDIV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGOO.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDIV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGOO.L is more volatile compared to EDIV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGOO.L.