Paragon Technologies, Inc.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RXEEY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while RXEEY trades at $30.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas RXEEY's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RXEEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to RXEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OSUKF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while OSUKF trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas OSUKF's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSUKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is less volatile compared to OSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RXLSF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while RXLSF trades at $28.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas RXLSF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RXLSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to RXLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RYSVF has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while RYSVF trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas RYSVF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RYSVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to RYSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EACO has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while EACO trades at $53.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas EACO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EACO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is less volatile compared to EACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SPRS has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while SPRS trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas SPRS's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to SPRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RHDGF has a market cap of 583.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while RHDGF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas RHDGF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHDGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is less volatile compared to RHDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EGIL has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while EGIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas EGIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is less volatile compared to EGIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KLGG has a market cap of 634. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while KLGG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas KLGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLGG's ROE of +2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to KLGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, JACO has a market cap of 629. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while JACO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas JACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JACO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to JACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SEDN has a market cap of 517. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while SEDN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas SEDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEDN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to SEDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AEYGQ has a market cap of 149. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while AEYGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas AEYGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEYGQ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to AEYGQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.

PGNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGNT stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PSYS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PGNT is priced at $5.98, while PSYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGNT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas PSYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGNT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSYS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGNT is more volatile compared to PSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGNT.